If there is anything to criticise here, the person coming off badly is QE. Part of her job is to have control over the families so she can be proactive in deciding what their roles should be. Even if the changes are initiated by the family members, she needs to be attentive and flexible and able to discuss which changes to make, when and how. She has chosen to remain capo di tutti capi instead of stepping down. I very much doubt she has the energy anymore to be in complete control of all of them, however PC might have, and possibly the children might have it easier opening discussions with him. It's very shoddily done, but very much in keeping with the previous history of the UK RF actually. No point in clutching pearls about it.
IMO QE isn't doing her job, and that's fine if she's delegating, but it doesn't seem she's doing that either. However the British seem to think she's above reproach merely by virtue of having put up with them for so many years or something.
The Sussex website is fine (it's not wankier than anything else in this make-believe world of royalty). Their personal message is fine. It isn't more arrogant than the existance of royalty as a concept. What is not fine is that it isn't coordinated from the institution as a whole. And who is responsible for that? The Queen. Sorry not sorry. You're blaming employees, not management.
I believe Lunde is the one who talked about "prince and princess school". Which, again, is the responsability of KCG and his court, not of the individual children or spouses. Never thought I'd be lauding the fecker!
Unfortunately I have no fashion to distract the thread with. I am annoyed with myself for even posting this diatribe since all the endless gossip and thinly veiled hate irritates me and makes me wish for some reddit-style moderation options!