My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

For beauty and fashion style advice, join in our Style forum chat.

Style & Beauty

How far is your bottom rib from your pelvic bone?

78 replies

harbingerofdoom · 25/04/2012 21:38

Misread a post on the blazer thread that said 10 inches.
I've got a 2" gap between rib and hip and DD2 the same. No waist and enormous ribs.(Yes I was a swimmer). I think we are now called 'parsnips' :o makes a change from carrots!

OP posts:
Report
CMOTDibbler · 25/04/2012 21:39

Virtually nothing tbh - I hardly have a waist

Report
harbingerofdoom · 25/04/2012 21:47

In fact 2" might be pushing it.... This explains why 'we' don't have waists. When young one can be a rectangle/column, look fit,boyish,sporty etc.
What to do now though?

OP posts:
Report
margoandjerry · 25/04/2012 21:53

I am very long waisted - about 8 or 9 inches. So I have a waist (or did). But I have to wear enormous clown trousers or otherwise I have half my bum on show. I totally get where Simon Cowell is coming from with his loon high trousers.

But can I put forward this theory: my observations lead me to believe that long waisted goes along with pear shaped and short legs whereas short waisted goes along with apple shapes but long legs. In a battle between long waist and long legs, the long legs would win every time. Sad

Report
harbingerofdoom · 25/04/2012 22:03

Let's forget Simon Cowell for now.

MandJ DD1 is my height,has a waist because of a much smaller ribcage and as you say slightly thigh heavy. DD2 unfortunately,does not have the long legs. (Dad's side).

OP posts:
Report
FirstLastEverything · 25/04/2012 22:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

bonzo77 · 25/04/2012 22:09

about 5 inches. which is huge on a 5ft2. So despite needing petite trousers (29 inch inside leg), I need normal or sometimes even "tall" tops. margo I'd never thought about it before, but i think your assertion makes sense.

Report
OneHandFlapping · 26/04/2012 15:31

About an inch, as far as I can tell. I also have no waist, despite not being overweight - it never occurred to me that the two things were linked.

Report
Siddhartha · 26/04/2012 15:37

don't all measurements equate to other parts of your body, like your arms outstretched equate to your height and your foot length is the same as your elbow to wrist?

my rib to hip bone is the same length as my hand length....about 6 inches or so.

dunno what that means

Report
Alibabaandthe40nappies · 26/04/2012 15:37

2 inches, I'm 5'2"

I also tend towards being heavy in the bum and thighs, and have short legs.

Hmm

Report
Alibabaandthe40nappies · 26/04/2012 15:38

Sidd - my hands are a lot more than 2 inches, so no correlation there!

Report
Quodlibet · 26/04/2012 15:44

Are you measuring at the side of your body or the front? I would consider myself quite long-waisted but only 3" at the side between lowest rib and pelvis...6" if I'm measuring the front.

Report
talkingnonsense · 26/04/2012 20:06

Yes, which bit of rib?!

Report
bigTillyMint · 26/04/2012 21:25

Probably about 3" at the side? I have a high waist, droopy bum, long legs and thunder muscular thighs, plus I am pretty broad Confused

Report
Somethinginthewoodshed · 26/04/2012 21:29

How the bejesus can you tell? My bones are so deep I can't feel them Blush [fat]

Report
CointreauVersial · 26/04/2012 21:40

There's hardly any gap between my ribs and pelvis, and I find it really hard to wear belts on my waist - there's nowhere for them to go; they just ride up and end up somewhere under my tits.

I'm 5'7 and a size 10, so fairly tall and slim; just straight up and down!

Report
AlanMoore · 27/04/2012 09:04

I think 2-3in (very pg so hard to tell), but I'm short with proportionately long legs and small waist so don't know what that means... (don't envy me though, I'm top heavy AND fat :) )

I find belts at the waist tough as well though am rarely slim enough to wear them. And I've got a theory that you get more discomfort in the rib area in pg as there's not enough room for baby to get comfy!

Report
Dawndonna · 27/04/2012 11:36

About 8 inches. long bodied, short legged, but hourglass figure. Tiny waist by comparison with the rest. No matter how big or small I get, I go in loads at the waist.

Report
CrunchyFrog · 27/04/2012 11:55

About 3", I'm 5'7.

And yes, carrot shaped Grin

Report
winnybella · 27/04/2012 12:09

Hmm. There's not much gap between the lowest rib on a side and hip bone, yet I have a small waist. Am 5'8". I think it also depends on a shape of your rib cage-rather than just the gap iyswim.

Report
winnybella · 27/04/2012 12:10

Ok, I find it hard to believe anyone has 20 cm gap.

Report
notyummy · 27/04/2012 12:25

About 6 inches. Am tall pear with small (comparatively) defined waist and long legs. Not heavy (size 10) but I do put weight on hips/thighs first.

Report
AmazingDisgrace · 27/04/2012 12:50

About 5" I'm 5'10 and a size 12/14 hourglass shape. Definitely not short of leg or pear shaped

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

talkingnonsense · 27/04/2012 12:56

Well about 2 inches at the side, but more like 9 at the front?

Report
FreakoidOrganisoid · 27/04/2012 14:07

I misread this as pubic bone and thought the measurements were all very short! Mine is 3"

Report
Alibabaandthe40nappies · 27/04/2012 14:23

Freak Grin

I have remeasured and the front the gap is more like 5 inches, but it is barely 2 at the side.

Also, my lowest rib is wider than the next couple above, which is clearly unfair. How the hell am I ever to have a waist with that bone arrangement going on?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.