@Liddywiddy
Our experiences are very similar and as we withdraw from the children, we also withdraw assistance for our partners. I completely agree, boundaries right at the start should be thought about and very carefully. It is much harder to break them X amount of years down the line.
At the start I was yes, ok, sure, of course. My boundaries were very few. It is in my nature to say yes. Of course I say no, but I was so naive to this life at the start. Now my boundaries are clear and my DP doesn't like some of them. For example we have the children EOW and yes he misses them terribly, but would still make time to pop to the gym for his fitness fix. Now I don't trust the children and what they say or do, I refuse to be their babysitter. If I was not around my DP would have to miss the gym on his weekends.
His children, his time in his care.
It seems this is extremely common.
My husband thinks that I'm completely unreasonable for insisting that if he's having contact, then that means the children are here to spend time with him. Time spent just being in the house while he goes to the gym or for a bike ride (and apparently it's all sorts unfair because normal parenting would mean I'd be looking after them so he can go to the pub sometimes too etc 🙄) is not time spent with him. It's not contact.
Then he packs all the stuff he wants to do in to the time they're not here. And he says it's my fault that he then hardly sees the baby or me, and certainly doesn't support me in looking after the baby, because he can't do it when the SC are here.
But parenthood is not having the time to just do what you want all the time. It's having to be in and looking after your children. When does he imagine the last time I went to an exercise class or out without the baby was? Poor him, only getting opportunities to sod off and consider his needs and wants every Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and every other weekend. With no proper recognition that he is only able to do so because I am looking after his baby.
This week, for example, he went to an exercise class on Monday. He chose a class that meant he'd leave at 6 and get back about 8. He'd worked until 5.45. So I got to do dinner and bedtime on my own. Then he complained that we were getting reheated food* because I was only willing to cook once and my DSes needed to be fed.
Yesterday, he went to the gym. He did eat dinner with the baby and me, but I got to do bedtime on my own. It was a bit stressful because I needed to have him down and be ready to do a counselling session at 8. My husband swanned in at some point during that session and watched the football. He'd been whinging about how he would miss the football before he left because I wanted him to wait and watch the baby while I tried to change the bedsheets. Still I finished the session and came down to a man in gym clothes watching football and had to clean the kitchen after dinner myself.
This morning he booked an exercise class at 7.30am. So he set his alarm for 6.30 and woke the baby up. Then he swanned off to the class. I did breakfast but he came in after the class and complained that I'd said I'd make breakfast for everyone. So I had to do the breakfast I'd planned before I knew he was going to a class (and actually told me he'd wanted to eat breakfast and have coffee before - so he woke everyone up earlier than necessary for that). And he announced that he'll finish work late because he's started late. So I'll get no help this evening. I'll be rushing around, trying to make dinner, feed my swimmer DS before taking him to training (with baby in tow), come home and eat with the baby and his 'hard working' and 'put upon' father, do bedtime, clean the bloody kitchen and then go to pick the thoroughly chlorinated child up again.
Which part of this looks like my husband isn't getting time to himself? Why should I be childcare so he can do this when he's supposed to be seeing his other children?
It drives me mad. I've said on another thread previously that I think as a society we need to really think about what contact is and what it is for. If it's about the children's need and right to maintain an ongoing relationship with both their parents, is that served by simply being nominally in the care of one parent (who has palmed the kids off to a new partner or his parents so he can do something better for most of the time they're awake)?