@palebluefringe I think I can see the point you’re trying to make. You’re essentially saying that all people should know that subsequent relationships, where children exist from a previous relationship are known to be more challenging. As such, people should understand and ‘swerve’ these relationships. Otherwise when they hit the inevitable challenges, they should have been prepared/ known what they were getting themselves into. You have a point but I’ll just reiterate the following.
Discussions about this are not mainstream.
It astounds me that there continues to be so much coverage Mainstream of domestic abuse and yet the abuse (in the main perpetrated by resident parents) barely gets any coverage. It’s abuse that impacts the children, the NRP and by proxy they partner. Why is that?
If you know someone in family law/ a family judge/ social worker, again you may be lucky enough to get a heads up and warned about what family courts see on a daily basis. I had always thought social services / court hearings main work was for child abuse/ neglect. I had no idea how much of their work was around awful contested hearings for contact arrangements. I had no idea that allegations such as child abuse/ neglect / rape were now daily allegations in nearly every family court room. Judges don’t bat an eyelid now when someone is accused of rape when there are contested court hearings. It has become commonplace. Again, how many common folk know that? I read a lot and I had absolutely no idea.
Spend any time speaking to professionals and they will tell you that the family court system and surrounding resources are not fit for purpose. They are overwhelmed, under resourced and huge biases (towards the primary carers) still exist within the system. Courts will time and again see that a RP is fuelling conflict/ being difficult and yet they have next to no tools to stop it. As long as a NRP is seeing their child, and there are no evident concerns around the child(ren), a whole host of abuse is fundamentally ignored. Why? What can judges do?
They can’t remove children (well they can but that requires a lot of professional intervention). They can’t penalise the RP (well again they can, but how many RP’s do you hear about getting put in prison for breaching a court order?). What courses can the court force the RP parent to go on to show the emotional and psychological damage they are inflicting in their children? They rarely do.
What’s my point? Yes what ive been through as a result of my DP’s EW is extreme. But less extreme examples of manipulation/ vitriol/ conflict exist much wider spread.
How was I to know? I’m an EW and I engage in none of these behaviours against my exh. It’s horrific behaviour.
Until these discussions reach mainstream media. Until the issues in the family courts are highlighted at the most senior levels. Until society as a whole becomes more educated around these complex issues. People won’t know. And they’ll meander into these relationships with good faith, trust and a belief that they can make it work.
No one, nothing, can prepare you for a vengeful/ controlling EXW. So many women cannot let go and are intent on exerting control via their children.
Would I date a man with children again? Yes. But would I get involved in his family or have him involved in mine? No. Sadly the choice I have ahead of me is to focus on my children, friends and family. And until such time that my children have grown and leave the nest, I will accept that any semblance of moving on is not happening.