Overall, what do you think of the BBC?
For the most part it is still the broadcaster that I look to first.
Do you think the BBC should provide more or less services (e.g. TV, online, iPlayer, radio) for the licence fee?
I think that there needs to be a rethink about the variety. More iPlayer content. More Red Button/online interaction for the Strictly/GBBO style shows but less chopping and changing. Example: that Brain quiz thing... maybe use BBC3 for trialling shows like this, if you want to keep it, BBC3 that is not the show, it was awful!
What one thing would you like to see the BBC do more of?
I would like to see more educational stuff, history, drama (Wolf Hall for example) much if the BBC 4 history and music programming is also much valued here.
What one thing would you like the BBC do less of?
Wildlife documentaries with overly 'meaningful' voiceovers, too much anthropomorphism, which is such an insult to what has gone before. Show me the animal and its behaviours, please spare me the 'wandering the globe lonely after his mate sadly died' - that is wrong on so very many levels.
Do you think what the BBC provides is high quality? If yes, why? If not, why not?
My last comment leads me to: please, could you try and check scripts before said fluffiness occurs? The slow erosion in the spoken language is infuriating. Grammar, please. Other than that I do like much of the content but am another that finds the constant hiring of showbiz dinosaurs irritating.
BBCNews: I do still like and trust much of the BBC News content. But this too is something that seems to be slipping - not to mention the proposed dumbing down of the weather??!!
Radio: I am not the best person to ask. R2, 4/extra are all I access.
Do you think the BBC is distinctive and fresh? If yes, why? If not, why not?
A bit like a Curate's Egg, I think. Where content is unusual, less lowest common denominator is where the BBC shines. So, OK, The Voice, but stop with the sob stories, leave that to Simon Cowell's lot. Your USP should be the talent rather than the short tale of misery and woe.
As for the cost, I am a bit of a luddite, no Sky, no Netflix etc. So I am quite happy with the current situation. But I would anticipate that this will change, maybe subscription for some content, that I will probably never access 
More succinctly: I grew up with and love the educational bent of much of the BBCs output. I object to the current dumbing down of narration, so much so I have not watched any wildlife programme in years.
Should subscription fees come in I am unlikely to access much of it, over and above the main channels and some exceptionally rare iPlayer access.