Apologies if not the correct area and please feel free to move.
I received a statement of reasons for COC refusal today and whilst it's quite vague, I'd like your thoughts on some of the reasons.
They're saying the medical evidence does not suggest a significant change of circumstances but, does additional care needs always have to arise from a medical point of view? ... our childs additional care needs have come about through trauma from the events of a crime. This crime is documented with the Police and details have been provided to the DLA and we also have a report from a developmental paedietrician which highlights what has happened to them.
In the letter, they say that sleepwalking in children is not uncommon and safety measures can be considered to help keep them safe. It doesn't suggest what safety measures could be put in place - surely they're not suggesting tying them down to the bed or fitting a lock to the door?
They suggest that bed wetting can be managed effectively with the use of aids. Again, it doesn't suggest what aids could be used - are they suggesting nappies (or similar) and leave them in a wet nappy all night?
The letter highlights some observations from a developmental paedietrician report that we have and mentions that the report states that the child is well behaved most of the time. I'm unsure at to what point they're trying to prove by highlighting this as I can't see how a childs behavior can be closely linked to their care needs.
I'm about to do my MR so I just want to be armed with all the correct rebuttal information that I can be.
Thank you.
Edited