the Op has an exceptional circumstance. She can’t get her son to school due to his special needs.
As stated, the case law notes disability on its own is not exceptional exceptional circumstances so it should not be included in EHCPs.
It’s not all about following protocol.
Hollow laugh. The law is there to be followed.
Mothers with special needs children have to fight everyday for what their child deserves.
That has absolutely nothing to do with whether transport is or is not provided. And I never said they didn’t, but nice bit of emotional language there.
if you’ve ever come across an ehcp that doesn’t follow ‘case law’ or is incorrect in anyway then that’s down to the school and the parents. i go through my daughters with a fine tooth comb. I make sure everything is on there.
And yet you continue to say transport should be included in EHCPs… It is the LA, not the school who are at fault for for unlawful EHCPs, schools don’t write or amend the EHCP and they cannot appeal it either.
according to your logic she should stay as she is and continue to struggle as it doesn’t fit ‘case law’. But special needs mums shouldn’t have to worry about ‘case law’ we should just worry about getting the right help for our children.
Quote where I said she should continue to struggle. You can’t because I didn’t. If you actually bothered to read I actually transport as well as many other things the pp could look at. Ensuring the LA follow case law ensures DC get all the help they need which is why the one mentioned about transport (and many other case laws) is included on IPSEA’s website. Unless you think IPSEA are wrong on what they think is important for parents to know, in which case you should let them know.