Big update here.
Edit : DS is 4yrs old. In Reception. Not compulsory school age till end of August being a summer born. But my choice for him to go to school.
So yesterday I had a phone call from the case coordinator for my DS Ehcp which is on its 3rd draft. I cant fault her, she was lovely and was very thorough going through what to expect etc.
This is where it went wrong. She tells me that when the plan is finalised, that MS with band 4 funding is what will be on the plan. Apparently this is and has been readily available for me to view on the ehc hub since they agreed to issue, on the 2nd Dec!
She directed me to where this would be and funnily enough, I have no such section on my decision tab. Nowhere on the hub does it say they will be naming MS .
At 2nd draft my DS current MS was consulted along with my named preferred SS. MS responded saying can't meet need, SS responded saying yes they can and can be named on the final plan.
Onwards to 3rd draft. I've directed her, quite curtly, to send a new consultation to my named preferred SS. She has done this but also sent consults out to THREE MS schools, none of which are my DS current setting . 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
I've been told, numerous times, that my sons needs can't be met with the level of funding he's been awarded in a MS setting and the SS can meet this need on that funding level.
I'm just aghast how they are planning to completely disregard his needs. They haven't changed, he still needs this level of support if not more .
I'm lucky in that I've got someone ready to fight my corner for what's ahead. I'm fully prepared to get an emergency review AND go to appeal as i know that the two can run concurrently. If by some miracle the L.A then concede and name my preferred SS at emergency review then I will withdraw from appeal .
Why does this have to be so hard?