Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

FWR

1000 replies

MarsScarlet · 27/01/2025 06:05

FYI: I've name changed for this to avoid a pile-on.

This post is about the overwhelming negativity and hostility with the FWR board that new posters and posters with a differing viewpoint face if they attempt to use the board.

There is a persistent group within the board that are, to put it simply, hateful towards others. Despite posting there on and off for more than 4 years, I have never felt welcome, despite not holding any particular extreme views or being abusive to others. Without exception, I am accused of being another poster, or a man, a TRA, or some kind of paid activist. This occurs again and again until I leave a thread in frustration.

I’ve seen this happen to many other new posters. Few return. Why would they? Such an acidic atmosphere doesn’t encourage healthy discussion. I’d just like to discuss women’s rights, but this board makes discussion impossible.

I’m not exactly sure what the answer is, except for @MNHQ to request the board to tone down the rhetoric a bit and back off on any new names they may see on the board. Let people engage with you rather than actively drive them away.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 11:50

BobbyPeruLikeTheCountry · 28/01/2025 11:25

I think it comes down to just having more resilience at the end of the day. Most of us have had our arse handed to us a few times or had tons of people asking us questions at the same time to the point of overwhelm. You just have to deal with it or move on. It's the way of internet debate for better or worse.

You have to ask though, why would someone expect to control how others interact with their posts that they personally publish on a public and busy forum?

BobbyPeruLikeTheCountry · 28/01/2025 11:52

Quite. It's just not something you can or should be able to expect.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 11:54

Try going on the Litter Tray & posting about wanting your cat to have kittens.

FWR will look like a playpen.

I lurk there as thinking about getting a cat one day, and you aren't wrong!

BobbyPeruLikeTheCountry · 28/01/2025 11:55

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 11:54

Try going on the Litter Tray & posting about wanting your cat to have kittens.

FWR will look like a playpen.

I lurk there as thinking about getting a cat one day, and you aren't wrong!

The Doghouse is surprisingly vicious at times too. Don't see much tone-policing there though.

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 11:57

@GailBlancheViola

Aaand there we have it - you deem Hellofabore as bullying people on threads and that is why you targeted her. So all your previous claims for just picking her name out as an example were dishonest.

Do not twist what was said.

I apologised to Hellofabore, and said I did not mean to target her - and I didn't.

She didn't accept that and kept at me.

She does bully other people on other threads.

OP posts:
MalagaNights · 28/01/2025 11:59

You should see the Royal Family threads. More time spent attacking each other than discussing Kate's coat. (Which is what I'm there for. I told you I'm not a proper feminist 😁)

I hate it when threads on any topic descend into infighting instead of the topic. It's boring.
I think the solution is ignore anyone you find antagonistic and stick to the topic.

BobbyPeruLikeTheCountry · 28/01/2025 12:00

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 11:57

@GailBlancheViola

Aaand there we have it - you deem Hellofabore as bullying people on threads and that is why you targeted her. So all your previous claims for just picking her name out as an example were dishonest.

Do not twist what was said.

I apologised to Hellofabore, and said I did not mean to target her - and I didn't.

She didn't accept that and kept at me.

She does bully other people on other threads.

It's hard to believe you didn't mean to target her when you named her and no one else. You could have made your point without mentioning names. She has a right of reply and she doesn't have to accept any apology you made if she doesn't deem it genuine.

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 12:00

MrsOvertonsWindow · 28/01/2025 11:46

Is it thinking that the site should adapt to their personal preferences or more that FWR posters should be compelled to comply with their personal demands? I suspect that it's the latter. It's been a fascinating threas and remarkably revealing.

It's worth remembering that we're facing one of the largest child safeguarding scandals of our time, precisely because proponents of the trans ideology started with #nodebate and embedded that throughout society - disempowering women, parents, families, safeguarding authorities and others while attempting to imposing a narrow belief on society that's doing massive harm to the young.

I see most of the demands for women to censor our speech on this thread as unreasonable and controlling. The same sort of control that #nodebate demonstrated - but more #debateasIsaynotdo .

Edited

"Is it thinking that the site should adapt to their personal preferences or more that FWR posters should be compelled to comply with their personal demands?"

I don't know. I just saw your post, but just asked a question about what type of person expects this.

I remember a poster from a year or so ago who kept telling us that we should treat them 'gently' and getting affronted when people directly told them they were misinformed because that was not a nice way to act and that this was a feminism board and we should be gentle with them or some such thing. It was eye opening to think that they expected this from strangers on a public forum.

I honestly don't know anywhere open to the public for discussion that does this, except those moderated for 'kindness' as in some Facebook groups.

If someone wants a place moderated to allow kind posts only, this site very much may not be for them. It is moderated as per the talk guidelines and it is very well moderated. But it is not a place where kindness is moderated for.

Having an expectation that a site will adopt a 'kindness' model to suit you, generally, is certainly an expectation that I find perplexing.

ShireMaiden · 28/01/2025 12:00

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 11:57

@GailBlancheViola

Aaand there we have it - you deem Hellofabore as bullying people on threads and that is why you targeted her. So all your previous claims for just picking her name out as an example were dishonest.

Do not twist what was said.

I apologised to Hellofabore, and said I did not mean to target her - and I didn't.

She didn't accept that and kept at me.

She does bully other people on other threads.

She does and so do a few others.

It drove me away from FWR.

Bannedontherun · 28/01/2025 12:01

Oh do stop whining scarlet - Helle has not bullied you and i have NEVER, seen her bully anybody.

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 12:03

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 11:57

@GailBlancheViola

Aaand there we have it - you deem Hellofabore as bullying people on threads and that is why you targeted her. So all your previous claims for just picking her name out as an example were dishonest.

Do not twist what was said.

I apologised to Hellofabore, and said I did not mean to target her - and I didn't.

She didn't accept that and kept at me.

She does bully other people on other threads.

Your apology was used as a tool to 'make me learn from my experience'.

If you genuinely thought that was an apology, you would never have included that in your post.

BobbyPeruLikeTheCountry · 28/01/2025 12:03

ShireMaiden · 28/01/2025 12:00

She does and so do a few others.

It drove me away from FWR.

Edited

What do you mean by bullying? I think it would be useful to clarify that point because it seems like some posters consider it bullying when other posters simply do not agree and keep challenging any points made. I would consider that debate, not bullying.

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 12:04

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 11:57

@GailBlancheViola

Aaand there we have it - you deem Hellofabore as bullying people on threads and that is why you targeted her. So all your previous claims for just picking her name out as an example were dishonest.

Do not twist what was said.

I apologised to Hellofabore, and said I did not mean to target her - and I didn't.

She didn't accept that and kept at me.

She does bully other people on other threads.

And the accusation about me being a bully, considering what you have done on this thread, becomes just more targeting.

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 12:07

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 03:30

If I had posted under my usual name, I would never be able to post in FWR again. Ever. My posting history would be forensically picked apart for everyone’s enjoyment, so I wasn’t doing that.

You were name-checked and your feelings were hurt? I apologise. Perhaps you have an idea, just a little, how it feels on the other side. It isn’t a great place.

This is the apology?

"I apologise. Perhaps you have an idea, just a little, how it feels on the other side. It isn’t a great place."

No... this was the very bullying action I have referred to.

Waitwhat23 · 28/01/2025 12:12

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 09:15

Because no one is advocating for Isla Bryson to be in a women's prison, no one thinks he should have the opportunity to be in a public toilet alone with a 12 year old girl.

Aren't they? I'm not sure about that. There are people in the world, mostly men, who think that it's a fair price to pay for trans self ID. Collateral damage.

To quote James Morton of the Scottish Trans Alliance -

‘We strategized – we strategized – that by working intensively with the Scottish Prison Service to support them to include trans women as women on a self-declaration basis within very challenging circumstances, we would be able to ensure that all other public services should be able to do likewise’.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 12:13

OP has had at least two posts deleted, presumably because of this targeting of specific posters.

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2025 12:19

PepeParapluie · 28/01/2025 11:31

For what it’s worth, I would also enjoy wider discussion on other feminist topics, and what a PP said about intersectionality would be really interesting and beneficial for me too. I feel like I’ve learnt loads from FWR and the women there, both about the GC / GI debate but also about more general topics like boundaries, tone and why women are often expected to have a different tone etc.

I would really enjoy such thorough discussion on a wider range of topics too, but the feminism chat board is a bit of a ghost town and I’m not sure that it’d be okay to start non sex & gender topics on the FWR board.

Perhaps OP, we should make more effort to use the chat board and make that a bit livelier?

It's absolutely okay to start any thread relating to feminism on the S&G board. I do it regularly.

In my view all feminism is related to 'sex and gender' - that's virtually the definition of feminism.

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 12:20

Waitwhat23 · 28/01/2025 12:12

To quote James Morton of the Scottish Trans Alliance -

‘We strategized – we strategized – that by working intensively with the Scottish Prison Service to support them to include trans women as women on a self-declaration basis within very challenging circumstances, we would be able to ensure that all other public services should be able to do likewise’.

Yes, a female person with the 'I am alright with these male people in female spaces, so you all should be too'

EmpressaurusKitty · 28/01/2025 12:22

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 11:54

Try going on the Litter Tray & posting about wanting your cat to have kittens.

FWR will look like a playpen.

I lurk there as thinking about getting a cat one day, and you aren't wrong!

When you feel ready, talk to me!

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2025 12:22

MalagaNights · 28/01/2025 11:49

I post quite regularly on the FWR.
And I frequently disagree with the woman on there about feminism.

I find it predominantly identifies as a left wing feminist space which you can see with the 'we' are not right wing objections, when they are now frequently accused of being right wing.

But I think that feminist theory purity has been diluted over the past ten years as the fight for women and children's safety has become real and urgent.
And I'm there for that.

I have had a few experiences when I've gone against GC feminism 101 when I've felt personally attacked & it quite shook me.
I sometimes wonder why I keep coming back when I don't fit in and have concluded it's because it's the only place I've found where I can think through my positions get challenged and develop.

So basically you take the rough with the smooth.
You are not wrong but if it doesn't work for you don't use it.

Possible its the board where nobody really fits in and that's the strength of it. Because it's primarily about hashing out ideas rather than playing ego stroking games.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/01/2025 12:24

When you feel ready, talk to me!

I will ❤️

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 12:24

MarsScarlet · 28/01/2025 03:30

If I had posted under my usual name, I would never be able to post in FWR again. Ever. My posting history would be forensically picked apart for everyone’s enjoyment, so I wasn’t doing that.

You were name-checked and your feelings were hurt? I apologise. Perhaps you have an idea, just a little, how it feels on the other side. It isn’t a great place.

Or perhaps you are feeling so self righteous that you cannot even see the glaring hypocrisy in this post.

YOU didn't want people to 'forensically pick apart' your posts 'for everyone's enjoyment'.

But you couldn't give one fuck whether people did it to someone else. Either on this thread or on another part of the internet.

BobbyPeruLikeTheCountry · 28/01/2025 12:25

Helleofabore · 28/01/2025 12:24

Or perhaps you are feeling so self righteous that you cannot even see the glaring hypocrisy in this post.

YOU didn't want people to 'forensically pick apart' your posts 'for everyone's enjoyment'.

But you couldn't give one fuck whether people did it to someone else. Either on this thread or on another part of the internet.

It's the usual hypocrisy that we're subjected to.

themostspecialelfintheworkshop · 28/01/2025 12:26

I have a colleague who once had a male colleague describe her as 'aggressive' because she pointed out in a meeting (and followed up with email evidence) in a totally factual and neutral way that he wasn't doing his job as he was supposed to.

What she was, in fact, was assertive and if it had been a man doing the same thing, no-one would have blinked an eye and the male colleague would have apologised and done what was asked. Basically, he didn't like a senior female telling him this totally because of her sex. A male senior colleague actually took over communication with him after the 'aggressive' comment as it was recognised as totally unprofessional and inappropriate (and wrong).

Women with boundaries are constantly told they're bullies, they're aggressive, they're not feminine enough. It's so boring.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread