Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

UPDATE FROM MNHQ - new Hidden Gratitude feature

245 replies

YetAnotherBeckyMumsnet · 04/09/2023 10:31

Today we’re launching a new feature called Hidden Gratitude. We’ve had many requests over the years for a like button on Mumsnet but shared concerns that some have expressed about it being a bit reductive and possibly turning discussions into a popularity contest.

Nonetheless, we think it would be nice to be able to thank posters for a particularly helpful or generous post. Hidden Gratitude is an easy way to show appreciation but as the name suggests, there will be no publicly visible 'like' count, only the user who has been given thanks can see it.

All you need to do is hit the “thanks” icon on the post you want to appreciate. The poster will receive a notification which will let them know who has “thanked” them. That’s it!

And, before you ask - at the time of writing we have no plans to introduce a hidden ingratitude button…

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
LaMarschallin · 13/09/2023 14:44

AutumnCrow

some the royal family topic lot do this,

Yes, it's rife there.

now that they've calmed down a bit from mentioning all the 'thanks' they're getting.

I saw someone else mention that - went and had a quick look but didn't see where it was. That was definitely something I thought would happen and, of course, with the "thanks" being hidden it would be easy to lie about it, if anyone was so minded.

WhatapityWapiti · 13/09/2023 16:59

Random789 · 13/09/2023 07:55

I've slowly realised a problem with the Hidden Gratitude feature. Usually, the community of posters define what the 'meaning' is of a certain button, emoticon, etc (the bicuit being the prime example since intrinsically is means nothing at allGrin). But when the button is only activated privately, no social meaning can catch fire. We only have the raw functionality, which is a bit like a block of stone that hasn't been sculpted.

The result of this is that we can't become increasingly confident about the type of posts for which 'thanks' is appropriate. And we can't become increasingly confident about the tone in which our thanks will be heard.

I think 'thanks' needs social shaping, which means it needs to be public. I can see that, if public, it might degenerate into a like button, which wouldn't be good. If I was god of Mumsnet I would try to prevent that by removing the clapping pcture next to the button. Clapping suggests the kind of polarising herd endorsement that would increase hate on MN. Could we have Flowers instead of the clap?

Odd, given your interesting analysis of how emojis squire meaning, that you don’t ascribe “sympathy” or “comfort” to the bunch of flowers. That’s what I always read it as.

Random789 · 13/09/2023 17:41

Yes, it def has that meaning too. I think it is also used in connection with 'thanks' though. In fact, I had this weirdly certain feeling that you could get the flowers emoji by typing 'Thanks'. But as you can see, that doesn't happen. Did it, I wonder, in MN's past or is that just a fever dream of mine?

Random789 · 13/09/2023 17:43

WAit!! WTF!!! Bracketted 'thanks' didn't automatically come up with the flowers emoji when I typed it but is displaying as flowers in the actual post!! <twilight zone music>

Alycidon · 13/09/2023 18:04
Thanks
Alycidon · 13/09/2023 18:04

Oooh.

MolyHacaroni · 13/09/2023 18:38

Urrgh! All the "I thanked your post but also want the world to know that I did so" posts are so annoying. You either give the "hidden" thanks or simply post the same thing you did as normal.

I know people will always find a way to ruin things. This hidden thanks feature was a bit of a compromise between either having the insufferable public 'like' button and not at all but posters announcing on a thread that they got thanked or they thanked a specific poster or will thank the poster back is basically doing the opposite of what it's for and like some have said, the feature becomes pointless.

You may as well post and say you agreed/thanks/backslap/'this' as usual.

I can see this being run to the ground in heated debates. Can't wait for the block button so I can hide anyone who posts juvenile crap like that.

That said, I've used the thank button a few times to respond to posters who replied to me. If I had nothing (further) to say to them, it's my way of acknowledging their post without completely ignoring them. It feels rude to just ignore someone who's addressed me, either irl or online, and it's always bothered me when I did. For that reason, I like this feature and this is probably how I'll mainly use it.

pinguins · 13/09/2023 20:48

Since the thanks button has come in, I don't like posting replies to threads anymore in case anyone clicks it, as my anxiety means that when I get notified of a "thanks" button, I go back to the post and have to re-read it 4-5 times to check what I said was ok and try and work out why someone liked it. This is why I abandoned Facebook, I start obsessing over everything I say. I really don't like it.

WhatapityWapiti · 13/09/2023 21:07

pinguins · 13/09/2023 20:48

Since the thanks button has come in, I don't like posting replies to threads anymore in case anyone clicks it, as my anxiety means that when I get notified of a "thanks" button, I go back to the post and have to re-read it 4-5 times to check what I said was ok and try and work out why someone liked it. This is why I abandoned Facebook, I start obsessing over everything I say. I really don't like it.

Just disable the email notifications for them then. You’ll only know you’ve been thanked if you go back and look at your own post.

OvertakenByLego · 22/09/2023 12:27

How do you thank someone anonymously? Twice now I have been thanked from “Anonymous user” rather than a username.

WhatapityWapiti · 22/09/2023 12:34

OvertakenByLego · 22/09/2023 12:27

How do you thank someone anonymously? Twice now I have been thanked from “Anonymous user” rather than a username.

Ooh, interesting. @MNHQ?

MavisMcMinty · 22/09/2023 12:42

I never get told who has thanked me, just “a user”.

Off-topic, sorry, but am I the only one getting a cookie consent box popping up every single time I click on a thread/notification today? Every time I post, as well?

Really annoying!

OvertakenByLego · 22/09/2023 12:45

MavisMcMinty · 22/09/2023 12:42

I never get told who has thanked me, just “a user”.

Off-topic, sorry, but am I the only one getting a cookie consent box popping up every single time I click on a thread/notification today? Every time I post, as well?

Really annoying!

When you click on the thanks on the post it normally tells you the username of who thanked you.

For example, if you click on the thanks icon on the post you have just posted it should say my username as I have just thanked you to demonstrate.

MavisMcMinty · 22/09/2023 12:57

Oh yes, thank you!

I have been using it as a “like” button, tbh.

OvertakenByLego · 24/09/2023 09:02

MNHQ, any update on how you thank someone anonymously? I have had 4 more thanks from “Anonymous user” rather than a username.

MavisMcMinty · 24/09/2023 12:47

If you go to your thanked post and click on the “Thanks” button underneath it, you get a list of the usernames who’ve thanked you. I’ll thank your post above so you can give it a try.

OvertakenByLego · 24/09/2023 12:51

Yes, that normally happens, but on some of mine it says “Anonymous user” rather than a username.

MavisMcMinty · 24/09/2023 12:52

Oh! That’s weird!

MavisMcMinty · 24/09/2023 12:53

…and oops, didn’t realise it was you who told me that just a couple of posts upthread, sorry!

OvertakenByLego · 24/09/2023 12:54

It’s OK.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page