Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

challenging ridiculous uniform policy

271 replies

Clearinguptheclutter · 05/09/2024 14:06

DS started y7 this week. It appears that it is compulsory for all children to wear a jumper underneath the compulsory blazer. There is an exception for this week only, and from June onwards but all other times they are expected to wear them.

They are allowed to ask to take the blazer off, but apparently not the jumper. In practice teachers we think are more flexible but that is the rule. Certainly when walking around school they are expected to wear both.

Both DH and I think this is completely batshit. As it happens DS is a rule-follower and will probably just go along with it but I just don't understand this reasoning at all. In whose interest is it for kids to be hot and sweaty when learning? Who on earth in the real world wears jumpers underneath suit jackets? From what we can tell the rationale is. a. the kids will look smarter and b. it gives the kids a "collective sense of identity". I rolled my eyes at that.

Anyway I'm also a rule-followed so will just hope it works itself out. DH otoh really wants to challenge it on the basis "why does the school think it can make a collective judgement on if our kids are too hot or not". In the real world if you are too hot, you take a layer off. You don't ask for permission. Obvs there are exemptions for certain professions for good reason. He has a call booked with the head of year to discuss.

Anyway just wondering what others think of this policy if you have them and has anyone ever succesfully challenged?

Or is my DH unreasonable for challenging and we should just shut up and put up. DH is telling DS "there is no need for you wear a jumper unless you want to and if anyone has a problem ask them to call me" which I don't think is terribly helpful. As much as I hate the rule I don't want to encourage DS to break it.

OP posts:
Miyagi99 · 05/09/2024 17:11

NeverDropYourMooncup · 05/09/2024 16:59

Over the years, we've found everything from coats, hats, blazers, ties and jumpers to shoes, socks and shirts. And dealt with kids on the verge of hypothermia because the parents haven't provided them with any warmer outer layers because they weren't compulsory.

It's not always about being awkward for the sake of it (can be, but not always), it can be because some parents won't equip their kids with adequate clothing and it stays on because some kids won't take care of the stuff their parents have bought - the numbers of expensive phones, earbuds, glasses, water bottles, pe kit, books, bags, house keys and jewellery that also end up in lost property and never claimed each year also show how seemingly essential items are treated.

If there are children whose parents can’t afford the basics then making them buy a blazer and a jumper seems downright cruel. I’m not sure what that has to do with children that leave expensive things and don’t bother collecting them, why does it matter that there is lots of stuff in the lost property? That’s what lost property is for, if not claimed by end of year donate to charity.

Needmorelego · 05/09/2024 17:11

@Clearinguptheclutter as I said a couple of comments back I didn't bother to buy my daughter the secondary jumper because I knew she'd never wear it.
If it didn't say "compulsory" on the list how were you meant to know?

urghhh47 · 05/09/2024 17:15

It was batshit rules like this that led DD to go back to home education after wanting to go to secondary school. Well that and she hated the lessons, found them boring in comparison to the internet school, who also, in her words "treat us like people". Schools are run more and more like military institutions now and yet children are increasingly having problems....

Needmorelego · 05/09/2024 17:18

@NeverDropYourMooncup maybe all parents should have to sign an agreement form before their children start.....
"All items my child brings to school are the responsibility of my child and if lost then tough luck. Lost items might turn up in Lost Property but if they don't there is nothing the school can do".
Well maybe not exactly those words 😂
Students should sign a similar one.....
"If I bring something it's my responsibility and if I then lose it I should look in Lost Property. If it's not there then I should have not lost it in the first place".
Or words to that effect.......

NeverDropYourMooncup · 05/09/2024 17:23

Miyagi99 · 05/09/2024 17:11

If there are children whose parents can’t afford the basics then making them buy a blazer and a jumper seems downright cruel. I’m not sure what that has to do with children that leave expensive things and don’t bother collecting them, why does it matter that there is lots of stuff in the lost property? That’s what lost property is for, if not claimed by end of year donate to charity.

The parents who don't feel a need to ensure their kids are warm are very different to those who find it difficult to afford items of uniform.

Things being abandoned/lost shows that stuff isn't looked after by all kids even when their parents have spent considerable sums on equipping them. You can't lose a jumper/tie/blazer/pair of shoes if it's physically on the kid's body.

The uncollected clothing already goes to the kids that are from financially pressured homes or are being neglected the following year, along with anything donated by leavers. It doesn't get passed on earlier because a. somebody might finally remember that there's a lost property area right next to their classroom and think to ask if anybody's handed in a jumper and b. if they're given out to kids who can't be bothered to look after things their parents have paid for, there won't be anything left for kids who genuinely need it.

amigafan2003 · 05/09/2024 17:26

Join the governing body - effect change from within.

Challenging from outside is just pissing in the wind.

EducatingArti · 05/09/2024 17:31

Needmorelego · 05/09/2024 17:10

@EducatingArti but if jumpers weren't compulsory no teacher would need to ever utter the words "where is your jumper?".

But then they would still have to deal with the umpteen cases of jumpers that have been mislaid/stolen etc, students disrupting lessons to go back for them and notes from parents asking for help in finding said item which particularly with year 7s unused to moving from room to room can cause significant disruption and waste huge amounts of teacher time.

Insisting everyone wears them between lessons I'd the quick efficient way of avoiding this.

EducatingArti · 05/09/2024 17:32

Unless of course, no-one wears jumpers in which case there will be a group of parents complaining that their child is always cold!

Needmorelego · 05/09/2024 17:39

@EducatingArti see the post I wrote above about parents/students having to sign an agreement - "If items are lost it's not the schools problem".
A child that says they've lost something they should only be allowed to go and look in lost property before/after school or during breaks.

worcesterpear · 05/09/2024 17:39

It's not unreasonable to challenge it but I doubt you will get anywhere. It is unusual to have a compulsory jumper with an optional blazer, it's usually the other way round. I don't agree with any of it and think uniforms should be similar to primary, if anything.

Clearinguptheclutter · 05/09/2024 17:40

worcesterpear · 05/09/2024 17:39

It's not unreasonable to challenge it but I doubt you will get anywhere. It is unusual to have a compulsory jumper with an optional blazer, it's usually the other way round. I don't agree with any of it and think uniforms should be similar to primary, if anything.

Neither is optional! But blazers can be taken off in class. Apparently not the jumpers but we’ll see.

OP posts:
worcesterpear · 05/09/2024 17:51

Good luck with challenging it, it isn't an inclusive policy at all. All those layers would be a nightmare for anyone with sensory difficulties, not to mention those who just run hot.

ThisHangryPinkBalonz · 05/09/2024 17:55

ClockwiseHoneysuckle · 05/09/2024 15:21

Is that the limit of your ambition for schools, that their pupils should stay alive? No chance of, for instance, being able to learn unhindered by being overheated?

Edited

Overheated in September through to June? Blimey, climate change eh 😂

ThisHangryPinkBalonz · 05/09/2024 17:58

Tinkeebell · 05/09/2024 16:04

What's wrong with complaining they have all these stupid rules that have no effect on how you learn all they do is piss young kids off then they hate school.
Does wearing a blazer and jumper give you better grades, I don't think so ffs

Following rules and decent punishments for those that can't follow them, do improve grades. Look at the impressive grade improvements from who the media classed as the most strict headteacher.

Needmorelego · 05/09/2024 18:01

@ThisHangryPinkBalonz well I've spent all of today (about 20 degrees, lots of rain) in just a t-shirt because I'm permanently warm. About October or November I might start wearing a cardigan 😂. I don't own an actual winter coat. I have just a pac-a-mac.
Because I'm always bloody boiling.
Is it climate change? Or because I happen to be a naturally warm person?

softcitrus · 05/09/2024 18:11

Clearinguptheclutter · 05/09/2024 16:40

To my knowledge no but funny you should mention as he is a governor at our other son’s (primary). I’ll be clear he’s been very supportive there and never complained as such about anything. But has def challenged and by and large his efforts have been appreciated- it’s part of the point of the job

If he's a governor, hopefully he knows how to challenge constructively rather than being "Mr Angry" and ranting on a parent Whatsapp group, or organising a petition on the dubious grounds that the more people who complain the better because it will push the Head into a corner.

Best to reassure the Head you're on their side, pay a few compliments to soften them up, then challenge gently but intelligently. And if you can help them to see it as their own idea, even better. It's much more likely to work (speaking as a fellow governor).

ThisHangryPinkBalonz · 05/09/2024 18:11

Needmorelego · 05/09/2024 18:01

@ThisHangryPinkBalonz well I've spent all of today (about 20 degrees, lots of rain) in just a t-shirt because I'm permanently warm. About October or November I might start wearing a cardigan 😂. I don't own an actual winter coat. I have just a pac-a-mac.
Because I'm always bloody boiling.
Is it climate change? Or because I happen to be a naturally warm person?

Must be naturally warm 😂I'm tempted to put my heating on 😬

Needmorelego · 05/09/2024 18:15

@ThisHangryPinkBalonz I'm the annoying person who opens all the windows on the bus.....even in midwinter.

ThisHangryPinkBalonz · 05/09/2024 18:16

Needmorelego · 05/09/2024 18:15

@ThisHangryPinkBalonz I'm the annoying person who opens all the windows on the bus.....even in midwinter.

Oooh no, we can't be friends. 😂 Though I bet you get less bugs then me

catzrulz · 05/09/2024 18:19

Apologies if this has been mentioned already, how are the staff dressed?
Will they overheat as well?

benefitstaxcredithelp · 05/09/2024 18:26

Can’t have young people making their own decisions on what to wear now can we…
Or on how many layers then need to keep their own body temp regulated 🙄

ClockwiseHoneysuckle · 05/09/2024 18:33

Newbutoldfather · 05/09/2024 16:14

@Fluufer ,

‘Work doesn't tell me when I have to wear a jumper.’

Although I disagree with the rule, school isn’t work. They are very different environments and need very different tools.

Jumpers aren't tools.

I'm happy to say that I went through education in an averagely strict school that trusted us to know whether we needed a jumper or not. Strangely, we all managed to get pretty good qualifications and to go into satisfying careers afterwards with no signs of major character damage as a result of this appalling laxness.

ClockwiseHoneysuckle · 05/09/2024 18:37

Ivyy · 05/09/2024 16:32

Imo there's nothing wrong with your dh contacting the head to ask the question, why is wearing a jumper as well as a blazer compulsory? It's just asking for information initially, I'd be interested to hear the logic and justification if he finds out op!

Our secondary has a policy where jumpers are optional, blazers must be worn unless it's the last half term of the summer when they become optional. Girls can wear socks during that half term instead of tights as well which is helpful.

If we get any unseasonably hot weather outside of that last half term of the year, the school sends out an email to parents allowing "summer uniform" policy on those days. Teachers can also allow students to remove blazers in a lesson if it gets hot in the classroom, it's up to them to judge / at their discretion and then blazers must go back on at the end of the lesson.
All very sensible and works well. Quite a few parents complained about girls having to wear tights in 30 degree summer heatwaves a few years ago though, until then tights had to be worn all year round. The school listened though and the rule changed.

Why is it "very sensible" that pupils can't decide for themselves whether they need blazers on or not? Indeed, why make them wear blazers at all if the weather's hot? No-one else out in the real world is doing anything so bloody stupid.

ClockwiseHoneysuckle · 05/09/2024 18:39

mitogoshi · 05/09/2024 16:32

Today at least you need a jumper as heating isn't on yet, they can slip their blazers off anyway. Schools tend to be heated to a level that allows for everyone in jumpers, if some were in just shirts then they may moan they are cold!

Why does it matter more if pupils moan that they are cold than if they moan because they are too hot? Presumably the answer is to tell them to keep jumpers in their bags or lockers?

ClockwiseHoneysuckle · 05/09/2024 18:45

EducatingArti · 05/09/2024 17:31

But then they would still have to deal with the umpteen cases of jumpers that have been mislaid/stolen etc, students disrupting lessons to go back for them and notes from parents asking for help in finding said item which particularly with year 7s unused to moving from room to room can cause significant disruption and waste huge amounts of teacher time.

Insisting everyone wears them between lessons I'd the quick efficient way of avoiding this.

The thing is, though, that plenty of schools manage this seemingly insuperable lost property issue fine without making pupils wear totally unsuitable clothing between lessons. Indeed, many manage even better with no uniform rules at all. Maybe the ones that struggle could pick up some ideas from the others?