@forfucksakenett
Well
*@smellycats* I agree with you that in 2014 they didn't make a compelling enough case but things have now changed.
It's interesting that no one in your opinion wants to be involved with the shit show that is Boris's politics given the number of people on this thread who were happily voting Tory. Lots of people in Scotland must love his style of politicking given that the Tories are the biggest competition to the SNP are they not and DR is happy to be the Scottish regional branch under Mr Johnson?
You are so wrong. Again. You are inadvertently illustrating why the Yes movement is in trouble.
The truth is, some people DO vote Tory because they support them. That's their right, and it should be respected.
Some people vote Tory because they're Unionists. After a 300 year 'Union' agreement, the fact that Scotland has Unionists in it is unsurprising and should also be respected.
But there aren't many of them. Historically, they achieved one seat.
I think the majority of Tory voters in Scotland vote Tory strategically. Which means they UNHAPPILY - not happily - vote Tory. And again, that puts the onus back on the Yes movement to ask what has happened in Scotland to almost immediately give the Tories a boost from a single seat at Holyrood to being the second largest party.
Because, frankly, THAT was the natural Tory state. No one voted for them before, except the unionists and Tory voters.
What is it that makes something previously so unpalatable, now feel like the only option?
And to then turn to people who despise the Tories but feel they have to vote for them anyway, and tell them they are typical Tory supporters.
Oh dear. Not a way to win them over.