@Chocolatedeficitdisorder, well, if I remember correctly, Orkney and Shetland joined Scotland in the 1450s. The union of the crowns happened in 1603, while the union of the parliaments in 1712 (don't quote me, I haven't checked the dates), so same ballpark. So why shouldn't Shetland and Orkney be allowed to secede? Does it only work one way? Only because Glasgow is heavier, it has to "drag against their will" other parts of today's Scotland? Very likely people in the borders feel more akin Yorkshire than the Highlands or Moray.
Should they be sequestered against their will? Shouldn't they have a say?
The same original sin that you accuse England of (i.e. the fact that it is too big and with too many people) is likely to be committed by the greater Glasgow area towards Scotland as it contains about 1/5 of the whole population.
Say yes wins by some margin, but in the borders they vote overwhelmingly "no", what then? Tough luck? In what way are you then better than the evil UK government?
Honestly @Arkadia you really sound desperate here.
Scotland is one country and England is another.
Scotland is large geographically and small in population. England is much larger in population. There is a clearly marked border between the countries, just as there is between most other countries in the world. Why are you still comparing regions and cities to entire countries?
A feature of all countries is that they contain regions, counties, cities, towns and villages. The residents of individual areas may vote differently but their reps are sent to talk on their behalf and make decisions to benefit the areas and the country. This is normal. This is what Scotland wants.