[quote randomstatistics]@NotAnActualSheep
My experience with DS also (age 6 at time, just turned 7). we tried zoom etc but the large group chats were a disaster (boys just shouted at the screen and didn't listen to each other so DS hated it). So much of their interaction at this age is about physical contact - playing tug, messing about building dens and just being buddies doing stupid stuff together. Going back to school was so important for my DS as was football club moving outdoors. So grateful to the club for trying to keep some normality in the children's world[/quote]
Yes, precisely... Zoom was either chaos as you describe with large groups, or like blood out of a stone one to one, with no one talking unless prompted by a game or something, because they don't do "small talk". DS hated the huge array of faces... like everyone was looking at him... or if we had it on speaker view, got freaked out by his own face. We caved and got a PlayStation for him to play fortnite and Minecraft with his friends, and it was amazing... they just talked really naturally... drivel mostly, but happy, fluent drivel which is the best we could hope for.
dancemom the card factory
I'd never have predicted a queue there! Glad you survived... now you can put your feet up.
dinnafash I think you're right in that more "diverse" schools are often really, really good. Ours is a mixture of families, but we couldn't really ask for more in terms of its supportiveness and friendliness. And yes, the school has benefitted from the pupil support funding and so on. There are horror stories of children at "better" schools having mountains of homework from early primary, being marked on a traffic light system against their classmates and so on, which I think would be a disaster for us. So our negligent approach to catchment choice may not have been a bad thing so far.
sturmundcalm not seen fluffy mens PJs, but MN is trying to flog me a tartan onesie with a bum flap at the moment, so there must be something out there for all tastes.