""why should the attacker sex come into it if the force of the attack is exactly the same?"
Well that is a whole other issue, isn't it? If a man attacks a woman then there is a lot more strength and force behind and it he could easily do a lot more damage.
It is all about context and situation. We are not talking about someone who is habitually violent or an abuser but a one off situation with someone who lost control and has said she won't do it again.
"
which is why i was very specific. the scenario would be exactly the same. exact same force in the attack, and a one off snap from a normally non-violent person.
"Same to MayorQuimby, if the persons sex is not important, what exactly is your point? The reason the Female, Female/ Male, Male thing is important is because of the ability to do do real harm. "
my point was to question those who were saying that the op's attack was acceptable (a few even saying well done) would they be congratulating a man who did the same. and the point regarding the ability to do damage was why i was very specific about the level of force being exactly the same, would the same people be telling the man, "yes what you did was wrong, but it's understandable why you did it,forget about iot and move on"
and i sincerely doubt they would, they'd rightly tear into him which is exactly what they should be doing to her.
as for the ability to do damage, for all we know the op could have 3 stone and and one foot on the ow so the potential for damage could be very real. equally a man hitting a woman could be weak and 8 stone soaking wet.