@Beansontoast
I've made clear that I erred in my choice of words and apologised - an apology offered sincerely, even if dittany doesn't think so.
I've also made plain that I am no misogynist. As a general rule, ad hominem attacks are usually the weapon of choice of the weak-minded; as such, they are better left untyped.
To clarify - in my first post I sought to assert that, contrary to what some on MN appear to think, not every male accused of sexual wrongdoing is guilty of it; and provided firsthand examples of where this was the case, as I interpreted some of the posts prior to mine as being somewhat prejudicial as to the guilt of the OP's husband. He may be guilty, he may not. If the CPS decide there is sufficient evidence, that a conviction would be in the public interest, and there is a reasonable chance of securing said conviction, the case will proceed to trial and he will be convicted or acquitted on the weight of the evidence. I am not going to comment on the efficacy of that process or whether I think he is guilty or otherwise; that is for a judge and jury, not MN. The OP asked for support, not a kangaroo court.
And before anyone repeats the mantra about believing her DD 100% - yes, I get the idea, but the OP needs to understand that if she truly believes that her OH abused her dd and he turns out to be innocent then her relationship with him will in all likelihood still be at an end. A stark choice - one I've not had to make, one I hope never to have to.