Interesting isn’t it that if this was a criminal case it would be a case of that the prosecution had to prove that the person was guilty.
And yet because it’s not, people expect the accused (i.e. the OP’s DH here) to prove that he’s innocent. And that if he refuses to engage, then clearly he has something to hide.
Why should a woman just randomly be able to send a DNA test to a man and demand that he do it and he should have to justify himself
Personally this sounds like some kind of scam to me. The woman hasn’t even contacted him herself, has just had a solicitor send a letter? Yeah right.
I’d be doing some digging first. Find out who this solicitor is. Find out what the demand is, and then, and only then, I would write back and agree to the DNA test, on the condition that the mother brings the child over to the UK and the test be conducted at a court certified clinic.
There is absolutely no way I would agree to do a DNA test through a random solicitor contact in a country whose practices are unknown. Anyone who agreed to that would be stupid in the extreme. And anyone who thinks that a man should agree to it on the basis he has nothing to hide is naive.
If the woman has nothing to hide then she’ll agree won’t she? Of course she will.
The burden of proof is actually on her not him. She’s the one who’s been shagging around and getting pregnant. She’s actually far more responsible than he is.