Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Photo posted of children without my consent

437 replies

OneCalmReader · 01/09/2025 15:32

Hi,
I recently posted about my Narcissistic MIL. She had got angry about me not posting a photograph of her hijacking my two DDs first look at my wedding. She ruined part of my day by sabotaging a first look between my DDs and she can’t seem to understand why I am upset about it and she decided to call me horrible names and say things to belittle me.
Well, yesterday she changed her profile photo on Facebook to the photo I never wanted to post. It wasn’t supposed to happen and she had access to it from a private album of our wedding photos. Where do I stand with this? I have reported it to Facebook for violating my privacy as I haven’t given her consent to post an image of myself and my children, but I haven’t heard anything back yet. I’m just not sure how to take further action.

OP posts:
Butteredradish3 · 01/09/2025 20:45

@OneCalmReader anyone in the world can take pictures you put online and use them and you don’t have a leg to stand on. Even if you are private doesn’t stop friends or family doing it as you can see. Morally it’s not something I would do but then I wouldn’t share my personal photos either as they are for my enjoyment and not Facebook

NewYearSameMe16 · 01/09/2025 20:46

Letsgoroundagainnow · 01/09/2025 20:29

Of course it’s relevant.. a wedding is one day, it’s the marriage that matters.

JFC!

So you think this is a perfectly sane exchange:

OP: “My MIL posted a pic of my wedding day without my consent, any advice?”
MN: “Your husband called you a slut”

Maybe medical and IQ tests need to become mandatory before people are allowed to post online 😅

YouMightThinkThat · 01/09/2025 20:49

Maybe medical and IQ tests need to become mandatory before people are allowed to post online

I do so hope you are including yourself in that?

Letsgoroundagainnow · 01/09/2025 20:53

NewYearSameMe16 · 01/09/2025 20:46

So you think this is a perfectly sane exchange:

OP: “My MIL posted a pic of my wedding day without my consent, any advice?”
MN: “Your husband called you a slut”

Maybe medical and IQ tests need to become mandatory before people are allowed to post online 😅

You think someone focusing on a “first look” being “ruined” by her MIL is sane enough to get married? When she’s already put all over the same forum that her DH calls her a slag and she’s already blocked her MIL?

You think that the problem with OP is the MIL? You think the problem is not herself?

And she accuses people of being triggered?

Yeah a sanity check is needed, a little late for OP!

Screamingabdabz · 01/09/2025 20:54

Content creator 🤦🏻‍♀️ …And the MIL is supposed to be narcissistic one?

NewYearSameMe16 · 01/09/2025 21:02

YouMightThinkThat · 01/09/2025 20:49

Maybe medical and IQ tests need to become mandatory before people are allowed to post online

I do so hope you are including yourself in that?

I’d pass any tests because I don’t think it’s normal to come online and spew vitriol about people’s lives who I’ve never met.

GreyPearlSatin · 01/09/2025 21:09

OneCalmReader · 01/09/2025 15:57

I’m not sure why people are triggered about having a content creator at my wedding or the fact my 11 year old wanted to record a first look. That’s not the point I’m trying to get at. My MIL went against my wishes.

Sounds like you and your MIL have a lot in common. On paper you should be best friends.

I agree with not posting children's photos on social media, because they are too young to consent and it goes against their privacy.

sugarapplelane · 01/09/2025 21:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NewYearSameMe16 · 01/09/2025 21:17

Letsgoroundagainnow · 01/09/2025 20:53

You think someone focusing on a “first look” being “ruined” by her MIL is sane enough to get married? When she’s already put all over the same forum that her DH calls her a slag and she’s already blocked her MIL?

You think that the problem with OP is the MIL? You think the problem is not herself?

And she accuses people of being triggered?

Yeah a sanity check is needed, a little late for OP!

😂😂 another perfectly rational response. I have a life, I’m not as invested in the lives of strangers as you appear to be.

If you think the OP objecting to an image of her child and wedding posted online without her consent proves she’s too insane to be married, I’m in the twilight zone 😂

Why not either a) stick to the topic and offer some advice or b) go about your day? Most people have gone for c) derail the thread to question the OP’s very moral fibre as a wife, mother and DIL and debate her psychotic obsession with social media for wanting to capture a few nice moments at her wedding.

sugarapplelane · 01/09/2025 21:18

MrsVinceVega · 01/09/2025 19:52

I wonder how many parents are going to bring content creators to their child's first day at school this week?

I wish the laugh emoji was back as this had me spilling my tea all over myself when I snorted with laughter.
I reckon Op may just ask her wedding content creator to pop along for the morning……

Fetaface · 01/09/2025 21:19
  1. How does an 11 year old know what a 'first look' is unless they are told?
  2. Your MIL must've got the picture from someone - who sent it her?
  3. Why is someone walking into the room at the same time as someone else such a trauma?
  4. Why does it matter who sees you first? Surely the content creator saw you before anyone else? So your daughter never had the 'first look' as the content creator got the 'first look'?
  5. What if you child screwed her face up on the 'first look' or was she told how to act?
  6. MIL is doing it to piss you off. The more you react the more she will have fun with this.
Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 21:22

It all sounds so draining. Your life is being taken over by pettiness on both sides. Your mil is going to be in your life for a long time. Can’t you just try to get on with her when you need to be in her company, and otherwise just let your dh manage the relationship between her and your DCs?

Emmafuller79 · 01/09/2025 21:22

OneCalmReader · 01/09/2025 15:32

Hi,
I recently posted about my Narcissistic MIL. She had got angry about me not posting a photograph of her hijacking my two DDs first look at my wedding. She ruined part of my day by sabotaging a first look between my DDs and she can’t seem to understand why I am upset about it and she decided to call me horrible names and say things to belittle me.
Well, yesterday she changed her profile photo on Facebook to the photo I never wanted to post. It wasn’t supposed to happen and she had access to it from a private album of our wedding photos. Where do I stand with this? I have reported it to Facebook for violating my privacy as I haven’t given her consent to post an image of myself and my children, but I haven’t heard anything back yet. I’m just not sure how to take further action.

How old are your children? You sound a bit unhinged tbh

Stravaig · 01/09/2025 21:45

They do say that men marry their mothers ...

dementedmummy · 01/09/2025 21:46

OneCalmReader · 01/09/2025 15:46

my eldest daughter wanted my content creator and photographer to capture a first look of me as a bride. My MIL rudely walked into the room with them, going against my wishes. So I decided I didn’t want the photos and videos posted because she went against my wishes. She can’t respect this

You don't have a MIL problem - you have a DH problem. Why are you having to deal with having your privacy invaded? Why isn't your husband taking his mother to task? You will never be right in her eyes so get her son to explain with crayons why (1) she is wrong (2) why she needs to apologise and take down the picture and (3) what the consequences will be for non compliance.

IridiumSky · 01/09/2025 21:48

The solution is obvious.

Do as I do whenever my content creators’ ideas or actions clash with those of my stylist or my footwear wrangler.

I simply have my people get in touch with their people to sort it out.

What a load of bo——ks 😄😂😂

momtoboys · 01/09/2025 21:54

For the love…

IridiumSky · 01/09/2025 21:55

ILoveWhales · 01/09/2025 17:53

Content creator is just a fancy word for posting shit on social media.

Err…

I thought that’s why we’re all here.

😃

SuPollardsPolkaDotFrock · 01/09/2025 22:00

OneCalmReader · 01/09/2025 15:57

I’m not sure why people are triggered about having a content creator at my wedding or the fact my 11 year old wanted to record a first look. That’s not the point I’m trying to get at. My MIL went against my wishes.

Because it’s a bit pretentious? If your relationship is that bad just block her then you won’t have to look at anything she posts.

WomanOfSteel · 01/09/2025 22:07

NewYearSameMe16 · 01/09/2025 20:21

Fair enough but unless you pop to a registry office in your lunch break wearing normal clothes with only the very closest people in your lives present, you can argue 99% of anything to do with a wedding is ‘unnecessary bollocks’

But what is the point of wasting all of this money when the op is marrying someone that is a complete shit to her. Style over substance.

(I did get married in a registry office, but not whilst working. Cheap, simple and full of the people we love - including children!)

DevonMum123 · 01/09/2025 22:08

I think you are over reacting. Maybe bit of bridezilla moment. Hopefully you can calm down and forget about it.

Scentedjasmin · 01/09/2025 22:08

Actually, I feel as though we have been a bit harsh on the OP due to the terminology that she has used about 'first looks' and 'content creator' etc. Had she written that she had wanted her wedding photographer to take some photos of just her and her children when she had just got into her dress, but that her mil had entered the room and ruined a private moment, she would perhaps have had more sympathy.

That said, there is a chance that MIL didn't understand the concept (which is new to many of us) and assumed that providing that she wasn't in the photos, that would be ok.

It seems though that the concerns aren't over the children's privacy as much as being annoyed at this 'ruined' moment and that photo being used as a reminder.

Op, this really is one of those times to focus on other aspects of the day. Your daughter still saw you in your dress and her reaction was presumably documented. You got married to someone you love. You got to celebrate with family and friends. Presumably nothing went horribly wrong? It's really up to you how you wish to remember the day and whether you would prefer to be on good terms with your in-laws or not.

MermaidMummy06 · 01/09/2025 22:10

OP, I had 25 years of a MIL like yours (although mine was truly vicious & alienated even her best friend in her later years). You need two things:

  1. Your DH to back you up, but pick your battles. This is the most important one.
  2. Stand up for yourself - don't 'keep the peace'.
  3. Minimise contact & her involvement in your life. Your DH can see her or whatever he wants, but we shouldn't be obliged to put up with disrespect.

It took me far too long to realise these points, and for DH to back me up. I also realised how my MIL manipulated everything down to where we lived. My wedding was completely ruined by my IL's. Stand up now & take control. No yelling & screaming, just make your boundaries & distance & firmly hold them in place.

WomanOfSteel · 01/09/2025 22:11

Lookylooper · 01/09/2025 20:18

Why does it bother you? It wasn't your wedding, neither were you invited to it. Sit down.

It doesn’t bother me if people choose to waste money on this crap. It’s theirs to spend. Doesn’t mean I can’t laugh at it.

IdaGlossop · 01/09/2025 22:15

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 01/09/2025 18:16

I've been Googling first look photos.
This is the first one I found.

I mean - it's shit, isn't it? Embarrassingly so.

There's no first look for the viewers of the photograph, unless you count the sleeve.