Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Family Drama vs serious activity

163 replies

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 09:05

I will delete this account shortly just looking for thoughts.

My sibling married someone had two children and has tried to reinvent himself to a degree.
But there are skeletons in the cupboard like ever family all bit these are serious.

Does someone marrying into a family with 2 small children have the right to know she is sharing space with a convicted/ imprisoned child sex offender for example?

The person pleaded guilty. Served the sentence. Its now being rewritten as they just thought theyd plea bargain.
This was after paying £15,000 to the victim in 2002 - alot of money at the time to pay them off.
Doesn’t sound like a lack of guilt to me.

The information has been kept from the parents by the grandparents.

OP posts:
Doingmybestbut · 20/03/2025 15:20

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 09:31

Actually thats exactly what I did.
i am now the “bad guy”
As apposed to the actual sex offender or the grandparent that withheld the information.
couldn’t make it up could?

Sadly I’m not surprised but you have done the right thing.

honeybeetheoneandonly · 20/03/2025 15:27

You say this is your mother's sister's husband, so your uncle? Does your brother and wife spend any time with your aunt and uncle? It's good she is aware and can avoid her uncle in law but beyond that, I'm not sure what you want from your brother and sister in law. What is your experience with your uncle like?
In your mum's shoes, I would have done the same thing and given you a very sanitised version (depending on your ages, of course) on why we will very rarely, if ever, see uncle Ray again.

ButThisIsMyHappyFace · 20/03/2025 15:29

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 10:24

Claire’s law only applies to being in a relationship with the person who’s done the offences so that’s not relevant
And you can’t do a Sara‘s law without providing birth certificate or health book some sort of proof of your relationship with the child which obviously she’s only my niece so I can’t.
It seems they walk amongst us and there’s fuck all normal people can do about it

Unfortunately, this is much more common than people think. Paedophiles don’t go around with a big sign on them (sadly). They are dads, uncles, stepfathers, “nice” blokes in the garden centre. Never ever assume that it couldn’t be true of someone you know. You absolutely did the right thing and I’m sorry you’re being so unfairly blamed. Much respect for being the one to stand up for the truth.

SnippySnappy · 20/03/2025 15:29

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 14:14

@Inthedeep I believe you can request to be forgotten on the Internet Google search engines along waves lines. I mean I could give the Birmingham a call. It was front page news at the time. And conveniently, he was sentenced the week before my wedding. So that I sort of sticks in my mind.

Hi, have you tried the website (don't want to type it out properly) uk HYPHEN database dot org?

ButThisIsMyHappyFace · 20/03/2025 15:36

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 14:14

@Inthedeep I believe you can request to be forgotten on the Internet Google search engines along waves lines. I mean I could give the Birmingham a call. It was front page news at the time. And conveniently, he was sentenced the week before my wedding. So that I sort of sticks in my mind.

The newspaper will definitely have it in their archives. It’s possible you could find it here: https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk

Lovelysausagedogscrumpy · 20/03/2025 15:42

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 09:40

Hes in very responsible position directly responsible for vulnerable children.
I feel like i could combust tbh.

I know im right. I’m getting thumbs up responses from the wider family (ie shut the fuck up i presume)

How has he been allowed to be in such a position ?

Mummyoflittledragon · 20/03/2025 15:50

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 13:45

So are you suggesting that I phone up my brother and his wife’s employers?
And tell them what?
That they have allowed their children unknowingly to be in contact with a paedophile ?
I suppose it best they might get a bit of a talking to. But do you think they’ll actually take it on board? I don’t know.
They certainly aren’t going to get sacked for it are they? They’ve done actually nothing wrong as people.

Edited

They may have done so unknowingly for quite a while. More recently, however, they failed to disclose a knowledge of conviction when told. I’m not saying you have to tell their employer. I’m just looking at this from what you’ve said on the thread. And well done for coming out and telling people. Have you contacted the police to tell them he is living with children?

commonsense61 · 20/03/2025 16:00

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Longdarkcloud · 20/03/2025 16:21

I would be concerned about the abuser having access to any children in the community, whether it be family, social or professional related.
Make an anonymous disclosure to Social Services setting out all the facts known to you and say those people who are aware are in denial and therefore cannot be protective.
An investigation ought then to be carried out regarding safety. Advising the wife of his prior conviction would not necessarily be at all useful if she is persuaded that it was a mistake or he has changed etc. Her ability to protect needs assessing, too.
Only by doing this can you feel assured that you will bear no responsibility for future abuse. Your family already blames you so let the professionals be blamed

sandyhappypeople · 20/03/2025 16:27

When was your brother actually told the truth OP, or was he never told the truth until now?

I think you are being a little harsh to involve his employers etc if he has been lied to all his life and never told anything, how would he even know about it? Of course he is going to parrot the story he has been told, why would he have any reason to suspect a lie?

If you found out years ago have you never discussed it with him either? Why not?

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/03/2025 16:29

Lokens · 20/03/2025 12:01

I'm very urban and apparently there are 3-4 historical offenders within 5 minutes walk of my house. I was told that by a neighbour 25 years ago.
We actually looked at a gorgeous house next door to one and viewed it several times.
We met them on one of the viewings, lovely couple, very pleasant man, in their 50's.....he had abused his nieces apparently some years before...suspended sentence 🙄very affluent area. Its absolutely everywhere sadly.

JFC. Absolutely unbelievable. He should have been in prison or at least living a shit life. But no, he has a beautiful house and a wife. 🤬

So many decent single women around who can't find a good man, and a beast like that has a life partner! Can you imagine a man staying with a woman who's a paedophile? Sometimes I think we women should take a leaf out of men's book and care less about relationships. (I know that's a wild generalisation, but from all the marriage break-ups I'm seeing in midlife, it mostly seems to be the men.)

ThisFluentBiscuit · 20/03/2025 16:29

OP, it seems to me that your mother and brother are in deep denial.

sandyhappypeople · 20/03/2025 16:30

I had reason to look up old newspapers recently, I registered with British Newspaper Archive and got hundreds of responses going back 150 years for the topic I was looking for, then I started looking for stories of people I know, luckily no crimes, but lots and lots of sweet little things, basically anything that has ever been in our local paper! But you can search specific areas/papers, names and dates.

I'm pretty sure you'd be able to find it there:

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/

minnienono · 20/03/2025 16:38

The only other thing i would mention is that it does depend on the crime. I know two men who were very close to being charged as young men, in both cases they had met who they thought were young women in night clubs but turns out they were under 16, only the fact they met in an over 18’s club stopped them from being prosecuted, one case was 25 years ago, the other was much more recently. If you are convicted of statutory rape you are put on the sex offences register, this seems the right thing when the older person knew the true age, very unfair when they didn’t know

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 16:41

minnienono · 20/03/2025 16:38

The only other thing i would mention is that it does depend on the crime. I know two men who were very close to being charged as young men, in both cases they had met who they thought were young women in night clubs but turns out they were under 16, only the fact they met in an over 18’s club stopped them from being prosecuted, one case was 25 years ago, the other was much more recently. If you are convicted of statutory rape you are put on the sex offences register, this seems the right thing when the older person knew the true age, very unfair when they didn’t know

Well it was absolutely nothing along those lines. It was a child molested from the age of five till 12.

OP posts:
MrsSunshine2b · 20/03/2025 16:47

minnienono · 20/03/2025 16:38

The only other thing i would mention is that it does depend on the crime. I know two men who were very close to being charged as young men, in both cases they had met who they thought were young women in night clubs but turns out they were under 16, only the fact they met in an over 18’s club stopped them from being prosecuted, one case was 25 years ago, the other was much more recently. If you are convicted of statutory rape you are put on the sex offences register, this seems the right thing when the older person knew the true age, very unfair when they didn’t know

Statutory rape in the UK means sex with a child under the age of 13.

Sexual activity with a child under 16 is illegal but it's not statutory rape.

If your friend was accused of statutory rape then we are talking about a young child and they might be glossing over some of the detail.

MissDoubleU · 20/03/2025 16:47

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 16:41

Well it was absolutely nothing along those lines. It was a child molested from the age of five till 12.

Jesus fuck. No one, and I mean no one is pleading guilty to that unless they know - because there is substantial evidence - they will be found guilty at trial. With evidence given at trial they have no room to control the narrative, which is why they plead guilty first and can say they were trying to avoid a harsh sentence.

He was very obviously not in any way innocent. They will have had clear evidence and he denied them the chance to prove it so he could weasel around claiming it all got blown out of proportion. Vile scum.

8misskitty8 · 20/03/2025 16:48

Newspapers will have their own archive of stories.
Someone related to a friend of my aunts was convicted over 20 years ago and it can still be found with some digging on the internet.
It was minimised by his family, he thought she was 16 (police found messages in which the girl told him she was going to be 13 soon) pleaded guilty to get it over with. All big lies, judge called him a predator, he did it to more than one girl and served 17 months of a 3 year sentence.

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 16:50

He changed his plea last minute after the trial, there are very clear sentencing guidelines so I dont know what to make of the plea bargaining claims. The family legal eagle reckons unlikely unless he gave away other paedophiles in which case the plot thickens.

OP posts:
Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 16:51

8misskitty8 · 20/03/2025 16:48

Newspapers will have their own archive of stories.
Someone related to a friend of my aunts was convicted over 20 years ago and it can still be found with some digging on the internet.
It was minimised by his family, he thought she was 16 (police found messages in which the girl told him she was going to be 13 soon) pleaded guilty to get it over with. All big lies, judge called him a predator, he did it to more than one girl and served 17 months of a 3 year sentence.

I cannot find it, ive spent most of today looking

OP posts:
MissDoubleU · 20/03/2025 16:51

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 16:50

He changed his plea last minute after the trial, there are very clear sentencing guidelines so I dont know what to make of the plea bargaining claims. The family legal eagle reckons unlikely unless he gave away other paedophiles in which case the plot thickens.

It was a thick predator soup that we was steeping himself in. Ah yes, a very safe man all round.

Bumpitybumpbumplook · 20/03/2025 16:51

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 16:41

Well it was absolutely nothing along those lines. It was a child molested from the age of five till 12.

Library is your source of info. It will be there in black & white.

No old man/woman pride is worth sacrificing a child. You won’t be the only person who remembers … women especially have long memories about dangerous men. Sadly, the wife often blind to it all.

sandyhappypeople · 20/03/2025 16:53

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 16:51

I cannot find it, ive spent most of today looking

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/

You should be able to find it here but you have to register.

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 17:03

It only goes up to 1999 for the newspaper that I need so frustrating

OP posts:
Inthedeep · 20/03/2025 17:11

Staceysmum2025 · 20/03/2025 17:03

It only goes up to 1999 for the newspaper that I need so frustrating

I’d contact the newspaper directly. My local newspaper has archives going back 100 years or more.

Swipe left for the next trending thread