"Dating apps imo are giving men the upper hand. They can try their luck with an unprecedented number of women. They don't even need to go to a pub and at least feign interest."
What do you mean by upper hand? I thought women didn't see relationships as a competition?
I think the 'problem' with dating apps is the same problem with big cities.
Those men that don't want commitment can tap into a pool of no-strings sexual partners. That used to be achieved via pubs and nightclubs, with taller/fitter/successful men being more in demand. A female flatmate once commented that London was a hard city to live in for a single woman that wanted a relationship because men had so many no-strings options - e.g. tourists, meat markets, etc.
The online dating scene is like that but on steroids. Data has, apparently, shown that 80% of women are chasing the same 20% of men. That suggests the following:
20% of men are going to find what they want.
20% of women may end up happy if they end up getting a relationship with one of those men (but how many of the male 20% are going to want the 'good times' to end?)
60% of women are going to be disappointed because there aren't enough 'desirable' men to go around.
The remaining 20% of women should end up happy because they're choosing from the remaining 80% of men.
Of the remaining 80% of men, 60% are going to end up getting no-one, unless the 60% of disappointed women change their online dating behaviour.
When the 20% of 'desirable' men are chased by so many women, is it surprising that they don't engage with relationships?
I don't know what the solution to this problem is. If you don't get involved, then you've already 'lost'. If you do, the odds seem pretty clear that you're not going to end up happy.