Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Husband came out as bisexual

551 replies

TARDISmum · 19/03/2024 23:14

Been with DH 12 years and married for 6.5 years and recently told me he is bisexual.

It's just so odd.

I know it doesn't change who he is. It doesn't change what it was about him that I fell in love with but it feels like the landscape of our marriage has changed.

I want to be supportive but just don't know where to start. Where would you start with that.

OP posts:
kkloo · 20/03/2024 23:10

PansyPolly · 20/03/2024 21:38

@kkloo

Hmmm… I think that’s a spectrum, though.

If a person literally cannot have sex unless they have, let’s say, put elaborate self tie rope on their legs, then that would need to be talked about before getting to the bedroom, to get the sexual partner’s consent in that moment.

Even then, I don’t think the fetish-holder is obliged to say “I will need this every time” that first time. Because they may be incompatible in any number of ways beside the fetish.

Opening up is a process of trust. Certain groups of people aren’t obliged to go a million miles an hour on that.

I have slept with - and short term dated - various men who didn’t know I am bi, and I am fine with that. More recently, I have been asked my sexuality by men disclosing their own - which has indeed included “straight” regardless of what a PP said about “the norm”.

Yeah there is a spectrum and people are often aware and have the implicit knowledge to know that a lot of people won't be open to the fetish and many will probably be turned off.

I can understand that opening up is a process of trust, but at the same time I also feel like it's selfish to wait until a person has feelings for you before bringing up something that you know has a pretty high chance of being a dealbreaker,
And unfortunately many people wait even beyond that time and wait until long after they've committed and intertwined their lives.

Sceptical123 · 20/03/2024 23:12

MMNB · 20/03/2024 07:56

I don’t think people should have to announce their sexuality to random people, but I think it’s important in a relationship.

Some ppl can harbour secret attractions to different types and all sorts of varied sexual fantasies and proclivities. It doesn’t mean they they intend or even want to act on them.

I’d be concerned that a man was suppressing something that could potentially be an issue later when they wanted to try it. As a woman in a relationship with a straight man, as long as it’s legal and not obviously immoral, everything is possible. If the man is bi, there are things that as a woman, I just can’t do due to being a woman. I think sexuality is such a big part of who we are, that we should be honest with partners. If you haven’t realised, but then do, and tell them, you have to accept that it may change things.

I guess the key thing (tho you probably didn’t mean it categorically) is the assumption ‘when they want to try it’. You said potentially and that’s what it is, not inevitable.

I can see why there would be anxiety, as you say, in simple terms women can’t offer what men do and vice versa. However, as I said in a PP, it’s a bit like saying you’ve always had the hots for Eastern European/ South Asian/Afro-Caribbean men/women - should that person be fearful their loving partner is going to become mesmerised as soon as they detect one and drop their current partner automatically? I know I’m simplifying things but I mean to convey that just bc someone finds a certain type attractive, doesn’t mean they are any more likely to be unfaithful than any heterosexual partner, or that they will naturally desire to physically explore that aspect of their sexuality.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 20/03/2024 23:15

shuggles · 20/03/2024 23:09

That's not an absolute, and not all "preferences" can be defended by simply throwing out phrases like "sexual sovereignty" or "dating is not an equal opportunity venture."

To throw in an extreme example, I'm sure if a man said he is not attracted to fat women, or women above a certain age, or women who don't shave, or women who do not wish to cook and clean, I think those "preferences" would come under a lot of criticism and he would not be able to defend himself saying "dating is not an equal opportunity venture."

The world consists of more subtle shades of grey. Yes, people can have preferences, but those preferences must be moulded and shaped by emotional maturity, compassion, thoughtfulness, and good character.

To the contrary, this hypothetical Prince Among Men is more than welcome to search for his Stepford Girlfriend and I wish him all the luck finding her because he's gonna need it 😂

By telling me his preferences loud and clear, I can dodge that particular chauvinist pig of a bullet far more easily than if he hides behind a veneer of PC civility.

shuggles · 20/03/2024 23:19

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 20/03/2024 23:15

To the contrary, this hypothetical Prince Among Men is more than welcome to search for his Stepford Girlfriend and I wish him all the luck finding her because he's gonna need it 😂

By telling me his preferences loud and clear, I can dodge that particular chauvinist pig of a bullet far more easily than if he hides behind a veneer of PC civility.

And yet, there are men who have those preferences and who seemingly have no issue finding girlfriends and wives.

whiteboardking · 20/03/2024 23:24

I am convinced my mates husband is secretly bi. Or she knows and ignores it / accepts it. His behaviour is often that of a younger single man, he's got a gay best mate & he often stays out all night

Sceptical123 · 20/03/2024 23:29

Lamelie · 20/03/2024 07:53

@Sceptical123 ”she is doing an amazing job of supporting him and more importantly accepting him.”
Hmm
Please can we drop the “be kind” bollocks. OP’s DH has thrown a hand grenade into the marriage. It’s not irrecoverable, it’s not the end of the world but it is about her and her needs wants and feelings and all this centering of being a lovely supportive wife isn’t going to get them through it or look after her.

It’s not exactly a hand grenade is it.

OP has said she doesn’t fear that he has cheated on her in the past or has the potential to cheat. She said the only thing that hurts her is the thought of him feeling that he has hurt her with this announcement. She said that she believes he told her of this merely bc he had decided ‘not to hide anymore’. She also says she’s very happy he has felt comfortable enough to confide in her and it gives an indication of how healthy their relationship is. Oh and that it wasn’t a complete surprise! 🤷🏼‍♀️

From what I’ve read it doesn’t sound like OP is dealing with any kind of catastrophic fallout, all I’ve read are messages of love and acceptance and seeking help to support her husband who has chosen to share this very personal aspect of himself with her.

I’m surprised you’ve read it the way you have as she couldn’t really be more clear in her posts.

Sneezingdust · 20/03/2024 23:30

TARDISmum · 20/03/2024 21:04

He literally just sat me down and said I need to tell you something.

Said he is bisexual and went on to say that he'd had these feelings since before I met him but only realised over the last year what they really meant

Yeah I think you can’t assume anything either way but it’s crucial to ask him why he felt like sharing with you. I’d probably come right out and ask if he wants to act on it.

It may just be he felt like he was hiding something if he didn't open up to you but it could be that it’s leading to something else…

MineAgain · 20/03/2024 23:35

shuggles · 20/03/2024 23:09

That's not an absolute, and not all "preferences" can be defended by simply throwing out phrases like "sexual sovereignty" or "dating is not an equal opportunity venture."

To throw in an extreme example, I'm sure if a man said he is not attracted to fat women, or women above a certain age, or women who don't shave, or women who do not wish to cook and clean, I think those "preferences" would come under a lot of criticism and he would not be able to defend himself saying "dating is not an equal opportunity venture."

The world consists of more subtle shades of grey. Yes, people can have preferences, but those preferences must be moulded and shaped by emotional maturity, compassion, thoughtfulness, and good character.

I think it’s fine to for a man to say he’s not attracted to fat women, or women above a certain age, or women who don't shave, or women who do not wish to cook and clean.

Women can then decide whether they would want to be with him.

You can have any preference you like. I have a long list. 🤷🏻‍♀️

kkloo · 20/03/2024 23:46

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 20/03/2024 22:52

Thanks for having my back on this.

I'm alarmed at the number of people who seem to lack Theory Of Other People's Minds and show a large amount of <a class="break-all" href="http://web.archive.org/web/20101225091701/isnt.autistics.org/socialdelusion.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Social Delusion:
Perhaps the "normal" people are suffering from a delusion, a SOCIAL DELUSION. They think (erroneously) that they are alike, that they have already communicated and that no more communication is necessary.

How else do I explain this expectation that I will somehow magically know what dealbreakers must be proactively disclosed, without prompting, prior to sex? And know that bisexuality (never homosexuality or heterosexuality, only bisexuality) must be disclosed unprompted whilst a whole load of IMO more important things, like prior use of prostituted women paying to rape someone, don't have to be disclosed unprompted?

How come bisexuals have to read everyone else's minds but the man who raped a trafficked Romanian woman isn't expected to read mine?

Who is harmed by this and who benefits from it? Not bisexual women.

This is just mental gymnastics.
The vast majority of people do know that certain things could be dealbreakers for lots of people. For many people who disclose certain things their experiences of disclosing that information is in line with that, they're always nervous about it and often very scared and have to build up to it.

They're not nervous or scared about telling a partner that they like their neck being kissed.
But they're extremely nervous to say they want to dress up in womens clothes when they have sex.

There's a thing called implicit knowledge you know...and the vast, vast majority of people are aware of the types of things that could potentially be problematic with lots of new partners and they can differentiate between the things that most people are likely to be ok with versus the things that quite a few will have an issue with. No one has to tell explicitly tell people, we just acquire that knowledge.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 21/03/2024 00:22

kkloo · 20/03/2024 23:46

This is just mental gymnastics.
The vast majority of people do know that certain things could be dealbreakers for lots of people. For many people who disclose certain things their experiences of disclosing that information is in line with that, they're always nervous about it and often very scared and have to build up to it.

They're not nervous or scared about telling a partner that they like their neck being kissed.
But they're extremely nervous to say they want to dress up in womens clothes when they have sex.

There's a thing called implicit knowledge you know...and the vast, vast majority of people are aware of the types of things that could potentially be problematic with lots of new partners and they can differentiate between the things that most people are likely to be ok with versus the things that quite a few will have an issue with. No one has to tell explicitly tell people, we just acquire that knowledge.

That page about the Social Delusion? It's part of a satirical "Institute for Study of Neurotypicals" on an autism advocacy website. It gives a glimpse into a "flipped" world in which autistic people are the "normal" ones and neurotypical people are the pathologised "other".

Social Delusion:
Perhaps the "normal" people are suffering from a delusion, a SOCIAL DELUSION. They think (erroneously) that they are alike, that they have already communicated and that no more communication is necessary.

What you call "implicit knowledge" is that social delusion. I'm autistic. By definition, I don't have implicit knowledge. The ability to acquire it requires social skills that I can never have. You might have this ability to pretend that you have communicated already with other people, but you do not have it with me. You have not communicated with me. You need to use your words and ask.

This isn't "mental gymnastics" (I'm filing that term alongside all the other variations of "I don't believe you" and "I don't actually have a valid counter-argument" that I see). Instead, I have thousands of explicit rules that people have sat down and told me after I've done or said "the wrong thing". Post-diagnosis, I consider carefully whether I add yet another rule to the stack instead of reflexively doing so and burning out trying to resolve the conflicts between them.

I am making a deliberate, principled decision not to add the rule many posters want me to add, which is to proactively disclose my bisexual orientation to a potential partner. I'm making that decision because:

  • Outing myself to a male partner puts me at nearly double the risk of DV compared to a straight woman and I have the right to refuse to take that risk.
  • That rule burdens bisexual people with "outness" in a way that monosexuals aren't burdened, and is hence unfair.
  • It likens bisexuality to an STI or prior sexual or violent assault, which are the only things that I believe should be proactively volunteered because of the physical safety implication for the other person. This adds to the stigma associated with bisexuality.
  • If people care that much that I might be bisexual, they can ask. Not everyone cares that much and only they can know whether it's a problem to them.

Go out of my way to increase my chance of being battered just in case a man who didn't care enough to ask doesn't like me being bi? Nah, not doing that.

Calling me a liar by omission because I didn't answer a question I was never asked isn't just an offensive slur against my character, it's disablist. I'm calling bullshit on it as of now.

Autistic women are three times more likely to be raped than neurotypical women. This "implicit knowledge" bollocks is part of that too. It's not the autistic women who are at fault or need to change here either.

LookAwe · 21/03/2024 00:28

HollyKnight · 21/03/2024 02:06

"I am not attracted to black people" - not racist.
"I am not attracted to black people because they cheat on their partners, smell funny and spread diseases." - racist.

"I am not attracted to fat women." - not...fattist(?)
"I am not attracted to fat women because they smell and have baggy fannies." - ignorant, obnoxious and bigoted.

"I am not attracted to bisexual men." - not homophobic.
"I am not attracted to bisexual men because the thought of it makes me sick/they fuck around behind your back/they spread HIV/I'd get my children tested etc." - homophobic.

GrammarTeacher · 21/03/2024 05:03

HollyKnight · 21/03/2024 02:06

"I am not attracted to black people" - not racist.
"I am not attracted to black people because they cheat on their partners, smell funny and spread diseases." - racist.

"I am not attracted to fat women." - not...fattist(?)
"I am not attracted to fat women because they smell and have baggy fannies." - ignorant, obnoxious and bigoted.

"I am not attracted to bisexual men." - not homophobic.
"I am not attracted to bisexual men because the thought of it makes me sick/they fuck around behind your back/they spread HIV/I'd get my children tested etc." - homophobic.

Thank you! Everyone is of course entitled to preferences. Obviously. Some of those preferences are bigoted in origin. That in itself also doesn't make you a bad person, the systems we grow up and live in support/encourage that thinking.
The questioning to some posters is about unpicking that. A lot of these preferences seem to be based on the fear of being cheated on which has its origin in a biphobic trope. Calling that out doesn't mean we're saying you have to date bi people.

UnimaginableWindBird · 21/03/2024 05:34

MineAgain · 20/03/2024 23:35

I think it’s fine to for a man to say he’s not attracted to fat women, or women above a certain age, or women who don't shave, or women who do not wish to cook and clean.

Women can then decide whether they would want to be with him.

You can have any preference you like. I have a long list. 🤷🏻‍♀️

That's fine. But if a man asks you on a date, it doesn't oblige you to volunteer to him your date of birth if you are 31 but could pass for 25, or that you have a Brazilian wax or a full bush rather than a Hollywood, or that you are wearing shape wear or have done a really effective contour. If it's a big deal to him, the onus is on him to ask.

NameChangeqqqq · 21/03/2024 06:05

MineAgain · 20/03/2024 22:34

In comparison to the percentage who are heterosexual, yes. It’s not a negative, it’s just a fact.

So my comparative mathematically “rarity” means I need to make disclosures the majority don’t? It puts an extra responsibility on me?

I don’t I’ve ever had a man disclose to me that’s he straight….

Beefcurtains79 · 21/03/2024 06:29

TARDISmum · 20/03/2024 21:04

He literally just sat me down and said I need to tell you something.

Said he is bisexual and went on to say that he'd had these feelings since before I met him but only realised over the last year what they really meant

So he’s known he fancied men as well as women for at least the last decade and a half, but he didn’t know that made him bisexual?
That’s…..unlikely.

Beefcurtains79 · 21/03/2024 06:36

Do you have children? The men I’ve seen come out later in have all conveniently realised they were bi/gay after their wives have their children.
Funny that.

Didimum · 21/03/2024 06:40

LovelyTheresa · 20/03/2024 22:11

How is that biphobic, though? If I imagine a man with another man, that is offputting to me on a sexual level. It would be biphobic if I treated said man poorly, but declining to sleep with someone is not that. Dating is not an equal opportunity venture.

Is it not off putting to imagine your partner having sex/anal sex with another woman too? Having an aversion to someone solely due to their bisexuality is the definition of biphobic.

Regardless, my original comment was directed towards the many biphobic statements on this thread.

UnimaginableWindBird · 21/03/2024 07:00

Beefcurtains79 · 21/03/2024 06:29

So he’s known he fancied men as well as women for at least the last decade and a half, but he didn’t know that made him bisexual?
That’s…..unlikely.

It's really, really common. I certainly did, along with lots of other people I know. For teenagers, "just a phase" is such a cliche, and same-sex crushes are seen as a common developmental stage for people who grow up to be straight. Then you get into a happy relationship with someone of the opposite sex so it's all a bit academic and anyway, the people around you are talking about "girl crushes" or doing that masculine "no homo but actually quite homo" male bonding stuff so you just think that everyone else has a level of attraction to people of the same sex, too. Calling yourself bisexual would seem genuinely fraudulent.

PansyPolly · 21/03/2024 07:08

There is also - and straight people may not know this - a lot of questioning about whether one is “bi enough” to say that one is bi. A lot of bi people won’t have “equal numbers” of experiences with both sexes.

What if you’ve snogged women but never got naked with them? What if you have had a lifelong crush on Gillian Anderson but that’s your only non-hetero experience? What if you were mocked as a lipstick lesbian for kissing and dating a good female friend when you were 17, then you got serious with a guy and everyone assumed they were right and you were straight all along?

(Nowadays, heteroflexible is a term - it wasn’t when I was in my 20s and 30s.)

So, yeah. The feelings might have been there for decades, but it doesn’t mean they were labelled.

Didimum · 21/03/2024 07:15

HollyKnight · 21/03/2024 02:06

"I am not attracted to black people" - not racist.
"I am not attracted to black people because they cheat on their partners, smell funny and spread diseases." - racist.

"I am not attracted to fat women." - not...fattist(?)
"I am not attracted to fat women because they smell and have baggy fannies." - ignorant, obnoxious and bigoted.

"I am not attracted to bisexual men." - not homophobic.
"I am not attracted to bisexual men because the thought of it makes me sick/they fuck around behind your back/they spread HIV/I'd get my children tested etc." - homophobic.

These comparisons don’t work though. If someone has a physical attribute you find unattractive (and still you’d be widely accepted and labelled as shallow), you have to look at this every time you look at your partner. That’s physical attractiveness. Bisexuality isn’t visible.

Other comparisons other people have brought up are also all problematic because they are all things that would directly effect you: if someone was in the army they would be deployed for long stretches of time leaving you alone, if someone wanted to go live in Timbuktu and you didn’t want to, if someone wanted to introduce BDSM to the bedroom that would effect your sex life, the list goes on …

Bisexuality is not visible and someone being bisexual does not affect your own life or your relationship in any way. If it negatively effects you mentally, presumably because you have negative assumptions and prejudices at play, then that is biphobia.

PansyPolly · 21/03/2024 07:39

@Didimum hmmm, but attraction isn’t just appearance. I still fancy the pants off my ex GF but she votes Tory now and that would be hard to get past 😀

HollyKnight · 21/03/2024 07:43

Didimum · 21/03/2024 07:15

These comparisons don’t work though. If someone has a physical attribute you find unattractive (and still you’d be widely accepted and labelled as shallow), you have to look at this every time you look at your partner. That’s physical attractiveness. Bisexuality isn’t visible.

Other comparisons other people have brought up are also all problematic because they are all things that would directly effect you: if someone was in the army they would be deployed for long stretches of time leaving you alone, if someone wanted to go live in Timbuktu and you didn’t want to, if someone wanted to introduce BDSM to the bedroom that would effect your sex life, the list goes on …

Bisexuality is not visible and someone being bisexual does not affect your own life or your relationship in any way. If it negatively effects you mentally, presumably because you have negative assumptions and prejudices at play, then that is biphobia.

I don't get your point. They're all still characteristics/traits, whether they are physical or not. Some people find sarcastic people funny and attractive. Some people don't find sarcasm attractive at all.

For most people, not finding someone attractive isn't based on negative feelings, but rather just the lack of feelings about that particular trait, or because they have strong positive feelings for the opposite of that trait.

The "-phobia" comes into when hatred, bigotry or disgust is the reason behind it. So, with sexuality, having a preference for straight men isn't bigoted. But having a hatred or disgust for bisexuality is homophobic. Hence, why certain posters have been called out on this thread.

Didimum · 21/03/2024 07:54

HollyKnight · 21/03/2024 07:43

I don't get your point. They're all still characteristics/traits, whether they are physical or not. Some people find sarcastic people funny and attractive. Some people don't find sarcasm attractive at all.

For most people, not finding someone attractive isn't based on negative feelings, but rather just the lack of feelings about that particular trait, or because they have strong positive feelings for the opposite of that trait.

The "-phobia" comes into when hatred, bigotry or disgust is the reason behind it. So, with sexuality, having a preference for straight men isn't bigoted. But having a hatred or disgust for bisexuality is homophobic. Hence, why certain posters have been called out on this thread.

Some people find sarcastic people funny and attractive. Some people don't find sarcasm attractive at all.

Yet again, that is a characteristic you’d have directly in your life everyday. It directly affects you. Bisexuality is invisible – it does not come into a play in your individual relationship. Your partner is with you, they love you, are attracted to you and they look like what they look like and behave how they behave whether they are bisexual or not.

Categorically saying you would never be with a bisexual person, regardless of whatever else they may be, just because they are bisexual, is having an aversion, solely, to bisexuality. And that in itself is biphobic.

I am not saying that woman have to date or be attracted to bisexual men. I’m not saying they have to justify it. I am saying that it is a biphobic attitude.

Didimum · 21/03/2024 08:05

PansyPolly · 21/03/2024 07:39

@Didimum hmmm, but attraction isn’t just appearance. I still fancy the pants off my ex GF but she votes Tory now and that would be hard to get past 😀

Hence why I listed the other non physical attributes: what job they might do, where they want to live, what sex they want to have with you.

Someone being right wing and the other left wing can very much affect your life together as a couple – financially, the way you choose to raise children, etc. Someone being bisexual does not effect you.

And if we’re getting down to it, yes I do think categorically saying you’d never date someone who voted Tory, on that attribute alone, is pretty bigoted too. Again, you don’t have to do it and you don’t have to justify it, but it is still bigoted. (Regardless, it’s not a good comparison to bisexuality however because being bisexual does not come with a manifesto and set of social and economic policies to subscribe to).

Swipe left for the next trending thread