I wouldn?t let a convicted paedophile anywhere near my child. However?
I know I?m going to get lynched for this, but I think the attitude of not letting your child have any contact with any male is disturbed, and potentially damaging to that child.
I can totally see the motivation behind it, but I think that our own experiences can sometimes skew the way we think.
If your dd?s are never allowed contact with any men, how will they ever be able to form relationships with men as adults, if they have never been allowed to form them as children? If you teach your children that all men are perverts, and presumably you will have had to give them some reason why they are not allowed to be with uncle john/granddad/daddy, (he is also a man after all so presumably also on the no contact list), then I fear you run the risk of them growing up with serious trust issues, but not trust issues based on their experiences, but based on the boundaries inforced on them by their mother.
There are men who are paedophiles, but there are many, many more who are not. Tarring all men with the same brush is extremely offensive to those who find sexual abuce against children repulsive and would never consider it, and will surely make your children grow up with a mistrust of all men which is unfounded.
Surely it?s better to teach our children what is right and wrong, rather than to take all risk away from them so they never learn to assess risk for themselves?
It?s like living next door to the school, and only going to the shops when the kids are at school so they?ll never have to cross the road in case they get hit by a car.