@Letitrainletitrainletitrain
Why does it always double up the first letter when I send an '@' symbol followed by a username... is that meant to be there??
Sorry, back to your comment. I do agree with you, BUT, when should we start treating MN occurrences as statistics? You're right that typically these are potential red flags, but are we treating the dregs highlighted on MN as the standard?
A man that spends £100 on a ring to some would be cheap, but there is a cost of living crisis, I'd call him sensible! On MN we see some really scummy guys (and girls!), but is this the real situation or is this the bullets in the plane paradox? -I.e. we see the scum because its only the scum that are moaned about... is that scum representative of the male population?
If a girlfriend said to me she wanted to spend £20,000 on a wedding, I'd question her motives, because I too have been burnt! I had a girlfriend that would spend a fortune (she earned £12k/year... foreign) on things to raise her perceived standing among friends and family... £1,000 on an iPhone... and wanted to spend tens of thousands on that one day! For what? What use is your neighbour thinking you're rich on one day if the rest of the year you're freezing in a blanket with the heat off?
Are we really saying here that this is a TACTIC by women to gauge their potential partner? Spent more than £2,000 on a ring, check! Yes, on MN the £100 scenario (what I actually spent on my wife's engagement ring!) would be a red flag, but is that metric fair? Is it representative of the 1% on MN, or the 99% of the good guys that don't get red flagged?