[quote SpringlikeBunk]@Isitreallyme177
I do agree with Cat in that you seem to be looking back at MrCricket through rose-tinted glasses.
From his point of view he agreed to be "superficial mates" and was clear he didn't want to date you, and you still seem to be looking for evidence that he had this secret connection with you?
But he never seemed keen at all - not replying to your messages or invites for days, or ignoring them, or only getting back to you days later?
(if he'd been attracted to you a "dinner invite at yours" would have had him running over immediately to attend!)
People can be nice, and Ok spending some low-key social time with you, without fancying you or wanting to date you.
I'm sure sometimes you have a pleasant chat or meeting with a colleague or something and say nice things (but don't really think about them after they've gone). That's probably how MrCricket feels about you.
I don't think he's a bastard or was using you or even thought that much about you (would he even have stayed in touch if you hadn't contacted him?)
Maybe he felt he'd made himself quite clear and didn't realise you were "reading so much" into coffee and lunch and the cinema, and putting him on a pedestal and seeing him as a future boyfriend and not dating anyone else because of him?
Didn't he say "not ready for dating/a relationship" originally? Isn't that the polite way of saying "I don't want one with you but I''ll be back on Tinder anyway"?
Sorry to be harsh, it just seems you're spending a lot of time on still analysing this guy who wasn't even giving you any signs he was attracted to you or was that into having you as a "really close" friend![/quote]
Ooh, ouch. This is (probably very painful but) very good advice, well said.