She must of known what she was doing.
It's impossible for you to know this. True she's an adult and well over the age of consent, and he's her older employer with the balance of power firmly tipped in his favour. He's proved this by asking her to leave her job. But these issues are really asides (albeit potentially aggravating factors should it go to court). The real question is one of consent, which is why it makes no odds whatsoever whether she was 16 or 36. Her claim is that she was too intoxicated to give full, enthusiastic consent. This is a really serious issue, and one which could land this man in a huge amount of trouble if she decides to pursue it.
It's also the reason why victims of rape like me react so badly to instances of victim-blaming - and where this thread is concerned there has been a lot of that, including the above assumption that she must have known what she was doing. It can be hard enough for someone in this position to come to the realization that what she has suffered was, indeed, rape - a horrible violation of her physical and mental boundaries - and any proof needed of this can be found on the myriad Mumsnet threads where a victim's first response is to question herself rather than the horrific behaviour of the men who helped themselves to her body without asking.
It's truly awful. The low conviction rate is horrible; the attitudes to women who have been raped, but are expected to stay quiet to make society feel more comfortable, are also horrible. And some of the posts on this thread are very revealing of these underlying attitudes. Check out the responses to Weinstein's trial if you doubt for one minute that attitudes to sex crime are very often to blame the woman against who it's committed. For whatever reason, it seems far more comfortable for society to believe it must by default be the women who are lying.
These are the reasons why monsters like my rapists were allowed to get away with what they did. It's why I, as their victim, find these kinds of assumptions so distressing. It's because attitudes like this are directly contributing to that low conviction rate, and the belief that everyone else is responsible for sexual assault except, God forbid, the men responsible. Yet interestingly enough, that seems to be the point of least consideration on this thread.
No one would need to look far to see why.