Toads
The court order is new. Previously (for 2 years) we had an informal agreement. The court order has formalised that exact schedule.
Prior to the hearing on Monday, there was a summer holiday schedule with 2 weeks still to go, which we had negotiated, based around the existing schedule but with a couple of additional days and another non residential contact that he had said he would forego.
I have learned (am learning) that if I offer anything, it is met with demands for much more. I am pleased the sheriffs order agrees with me however, even if their dad had been awarded more, I would still comply because I don’t want to breach an order made in court by a sheriff who believes it was the best for my dc.
The court issued the order. It is pretty concise. It states when residential contact and non residential contact should take place. No mention of term time only or a start date.
By complying he will lose 2 additional days and pick up one normal non residential he had requested to drop.
Now, it may be pedantic of me but, nevertheless, I believe a court order supersedes any previously agreed informal arrangement. Otherwise what is the point of a court order?
I want to comply. Because if I don’t, he will use it as a reason to negotiate on every little thing for evermore.
He asked the court to make an order because he thought I wasn’t putting the dcs interests first. That it would be better for the order to be made than not. To have a formal agreement.
But, because it went against him (at least for now), he is saying I should honour what we informally agreed. That that was better for the dc and that the order doesn’t come into effect immediately but only when our informal summer schedule ends.
Well fucking tough shit!
The order was issued the day before his birthday. We had informally agreed to his having the dc overnight. I let this go ahead but sent an email after the dc had gone for that overnight, saying the order had been issued and I’d be complying as of the next day when the dc would come home.
And he’s spat his dummy out.
I am “disruptive”, “reneging” (which he sent a link to the definition of because I’m so thick I couldn’t possible know what the word meant), “misrepresenting”, “avoiding”, “dishonourable”, unreasonable”, “unjustifiable”. These are words from the 6 emails he has sent on this issue in 2 days.
I have not replied. I think I will forward them to my lawyer on Monday and ask him to deal with it. I’m nearly done with this arsehole.