You see, that just seems to be unnecessary time. I already DID try to mediate with him. Do I have to now be reasonable (bloody sick of being reasonable - a week here, 10 days there....). It just seems like a game.
It IS a game... Think of it as a game of chess. There are moves, and counter moves. The "winner" is the person who learns how to play the game and knows the moves not only that they will be making, but also those their opponent will make.
I go to MIAM, am encouraged to invite EA ex to go, he ignores request, MIAN exemption is sent to me, I apply to Court, judge says ex HAS to go to mediation, ex has a reasonable time to book MIAM (14 days I imagine), he goes within a reasonable time (within a week I imagine, it's a waste of time or he kicks off as he did for the divorce MIAM, I go back to Court. It is exactly the thought of this situation which reduced me to tears when I went to my MIAM.
Yes, it sucks. But the wheels of justice are slow indeed. The quickest way to sort this, however, is to work the existing system as best you can.
Just thought - at the first hearing, you could ask for an interim order to bring some stability to the situation while mediation goes on... I've heard of interim orders being granted before, but in different circumstances - usually if one parent has stopped contact for flimsy reasons etc.
It might not work, but it certainly wouldn't hurt to ask.
Would they give me another mediation exemption? What's the point of the first one then?
The first one is for reasonable people to attend... You went, your ex didn't.
If it's routine for the judge to send to MIAM anyway, why not just do it at this stage? I did ask the mediator to state that I would be applying to court if ex didn't go to MIAM, but he (rightly) said he couldn't put that in the letter because he had to be impartial. I get that, but surely there should be some standard letter that informs reluctant MIAM attendees that it is likely a judge will send them anyway.
The courts really don't want their time being taken up by low level disputes that can be sorted out by mediation, hence their insistence that mediation is attempted before they make an order.
I'm in two minds about your ex - he sounds obstructive and abusive, but he doesn't sound stupid. I'd be surprised if he doesn't know the implications and processes of child arrangements - I'd suspect he would have looked into this sort of thing at some point. But the flip side is if he had read up I rather think he'd be playing the game a bit more...
Not having a go at you c3, but I am so frustrated.
I understand your frustration... I'm not an expert, but I've been through some of it and read up on it a lot, so I have a few clues, but each case (and judge) is different, so all my advice may be totally off the mark and it may not happen the way I expect at all... So there is hope!
I am going for a run.
You strike me as a woman of reasonable stamina - I'm sure you can see this through to the end. I'm yet to speak to a person who took a case to court and actually regretted it. Stick at it.