KM, I am sorry it was not the answer you were looking for.
You have not done "anything wrong". You have not "destroyed your own case" - it doesn't work like that. It is what it is.
The fact there are inconsistencies does not make your account untrue, it means that there are hurdles towards a successful prosecution.
Can I tell you how I would view this if I was asked to prosecute this? (As I could easily have been).
Inconsistencies alone don't necessarily bother me (they bother the police a lot more, interestingly - as a barrister I generally take the view that juries are smarter than that).
But what would bother me - a lot - would be your ability to withstand a trial and the possible "not guilty" verdict.
Defence barristers in rape cases are much better these days (indeed, there are moves afoot to make us all go on compulsory vulnerable witness training. I have done it voluntarily, as have man others).
But the fact is - they will not be required to avoid the word you hate so much. They would have to say things that would upset you - it is inevitable.
As the prosecuting barrister, I have a duty of care to you. The last thing I would want to do is to make your suffering worse - and I fear the trial experience would do just that.
There are other options - I have done a few civil claims where women are suing their attackers. The standard of proof in the civil courts is lower (balance of probabilities). But it is a trial process like any other, and there are costs involved.
There is time for that later -for now, I wish you peace and healing now.