Why do some posters think that women 'go after' their husbands? If you look at it logically, it really doesn't happen that way, does it? It's buying into the ridiculous notion of 'temptress'; hussies-that-steal-away-innocent-and-kicking-and-screaming-men...
From what I can see, it's the MEN who do the running, that's right - the husbands that you're so keen to absolve. I know there are some women who see it as some kind of sport but I don't see that these are the same women who then build up relationships with married men, they would surely move on once 'conquered'.
People keep saying "If a married man came on to me, I'd tell him to leave me alone...". Yes, I expect you would if that was the exact scenario. It doesn't work like that in reality. Even the most willing, potential 'OW' would look askance at such a situation. With the exception of one night stands, OW/OM relationships are constructed by the two of them and the basis isn't usually a bald invitation for a 'shag'. It's friendship... and it goes too far.
The 'sisterhood' thing gets on my wick; I see women being absolutely vile to each other, in any number of silly and pointless situations BUT, throw in the magic words of 'OW' and it's yanked back in to play. Sisterhood is either there in support of women - all women - or it isn't. It's not a 'pick-n-mix' thing.
Look at the neverending myths;
-
OW lesser than the wife: If you're daft enough to use that as a yardstick then you can't help but measure yourself against somebody that YOU think is less worth of you, yet your husband thinks is somehow 'on par' or better, as they actively choose to break their vows with this person.
-
Madonna/whore thing: If you read the Friday night threads here, many couples are quite active on the sex front. Posters take great glee in describing their detailed activities. So, if you accept that this is not unusual, where does the 'whore' thing come into it? It just makes the cheating somehow a little easier? If the act itself is split into what's 'holy' and what isn't? It makes no sense.
-
Travelodge liaisons and similar: Given that affairs are 'taboo'; they're general underground and this means that affair partners will meet in anonymous places rather than a 'family friendly B&B' type place where they will be unwillingly drawn into discussion/chat when they want to be with each other.
No, it isn't comfortable to think of husbands or wives having affairs. It's heartbreaking and devastating. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Ranting at an OW/OM who posts on a chatboard isn't going to make them stop. Perhaps nothing short of discovery will but, some posters manage to post really eloquently, even having been cheated on themselves, to let the OW/OM know exactly how the ripples of their behaviour impacts on a family for a long time. It still may not make the OM/OW stop, but it may make them think and that's how seeds of doubt are planted. In my opinion, far more valuable than spleen venting and name-calling.