OWW - also very
for you.
I ended up meeting Derby last night, we had a couple of drinks and chatted for a few hours - she is very nice. I'd give her three and a half penguins. Maybe 4. There's lots of chemistry there and she made me laugh a few times. I did not, I should say, fall madly in love with her
I think I have to have some kind of chat with Mermaid about what's going on - I'm happy to be the general amiable man about town if Mermaid is still seeing those guys, and see where things go with her when I see her, I really don't want to withdraw into my shell and not socialise because I'm pining for someone a third of the world away. But also I don't want to feel like I'm cheating on anyone.
Not sure whether to see Derby again. I'd like to.
As to the question about the blog upthread - my personal perspective is that men are generally more romantic than women, who are a bit more pragmatic. The thing about women on the same level as a man being swooped upon by more good looking men sounds like something written by an insecure man though, to be honest. I've seen it's not about looks so much, it's confidence, humour and a few other things other than just looks that attract women of all kinds.
And I'd rather be with a 7 that was funny than a 9 who was dull. Just look at CheshireCat. A 28 year old model who was so dull that I would prefer to go back to OD and try and find someone interesting rather than continue seeing her. Derby is a funny 7. Mermaid is a funny 8. CheshireCat was a dull 9, Aruba was a somewhat zany 8.
Snape - also very
for you.
[antimatter] - it's not all men, and it's not just men. I had two dates with a girl where there was lots of chemistry, kisses goodnight, there seemed to be a real connection, then she just vanished before our planned 3rd date. No one finds it easy to say 'sorry I'm just not that into you' but it is polite to do it after a second date at least. It can, however, lead to being on the receiving end of bad poetry as a response.