The reason I'm so naive is because I've deliberately kept away from men most of my life (again; long story!) and the only experience I have to draw on is my ex - who DOES just tell me he'll be round for sex when it suits. He's living with someone but swears blind he's not in a relationship with her; just lodging - obviously I don't believe that so don't sleep with him, but I just found it strange that this guy admitted he was in a relationship from the off; and he's not making out like he's unhappy in the relationship or planning to leave - he could've made out he was single and I'd never have known.
Just re-read through the last few texts that were sent last night though and I don't think I was being unclear:
ME: bottom line is; and obv I don't know the details but you're in a relationship so in my mind it's simple - there are only 2 things you could want me for - a text based ego boost sort of thing, ir sex; to put it bluntly. Whether you admit which it is you want is up to you, but obviously I draw my own conclusions. And the reason I'm saying this btw is my ex is a womaniser, so I don't fall for the cliched rubbish he churns out anymore (was hoping that this guy would realise that meant I'm not falling for his crap too!).
HIM: Texting is difficult, but face to face could be more dangerous - I'm in a relationship with someone who is ten thousand miles away who I haven't seen for 6 months and not sure when I'm going to get to see her again, but probaly another 6 months. So sometimes I get lonely.
I dont want sympathy I can feel sorry enough for myself at times, but it seems ironic given I'm not Catholic (there is a reason he mentioned that - long story again!) but am I being tempted during Lent?
ME: it's that lonely word again... Look, presumably you love her so do you really think I'm going to seduce you or something? Sorry but not my style. I respect people's relationships - so maybe to save futher complications I should just leave you alone. Oh, and the fact you mentioned coming over earlier on and are now mentioning being 'tempted' seems like you were just teasing, or testing me to see how I'd react.
HIM: No I wasn't teasing and I am caught in a dilemma. You probably should leave me alone...do you want to?
And I would miss the knots you tie me into. I guess I would enjoy the ego boost whether intended or not. Sorry for all the heavy stuff but you did ask.
And I still want to know what you want, what you need.
ME: Did you want me to ask you to come over tonight? To stand outside and talk, nothing else, no coming inside but just have this chat and get it sorted once and for all. I know you wouldn't have come over but was there a bit of you wanting me to ask or would that have been a step too far? And I genuinely meant just a chat, nothing flirty. And were you saying you do want me to leave you alone in your last message? Cos I was a bit confused...
HIM: I want both and yes an invite to stand on your doorstep would be good but preferably not when there is a blizzard. I guess I need you to take a lead sorry.
ME: Basically, all this is, is I was friendly in work, as others are too...and when I messaged you it was maybe a bit flattering. Theres nothing more to it, we couldn't go anywhere apart from at the very most sex; which isn't right as you're not single.
HIM: Yes you were friendly which I may have misconstrued. But there is something different about you, something intriguing...that's just the way you are. I like having these discussions with you.
Sorry, that ended up being more texts than I intended copying out on here! But seeing through all the "you're different" bullshit cos I know that's just vacuous flattery, are you still all thinking the same?
And I did tell hm a few times...he's not single, I'm not into sex with partnered-up people, so he should've got the message right?