Hello peeps. Crawling back in again.
OK, I've got up to a second date- promise of a third, but he hasn't rung yet- with Mr Nice-but-I'm-not-sure-yet.....So far so good there...
....but I've also been messaging someone else (I initiated this one) and I needed to ask y'all's opinion. OK, so he's right up my street (similar interests and lifestyle, is a single dad), but lives quite a long way away (66 miles to be precise- he looked it up
). I should point out that I'm v.v. rural indeed, which is why I'm considering chaps this kind of distance away....
However, after a few messages he basically asked me if I was interested in more than chatting, and did I think a relationship at such a distance was feasible? (fair enough).
So, I replied that I'd messaged him because I liked the sound of him, we're rural so have to roam a bit further afield etc.etc., and that basically, in theory I could see it working logistically;
...and this is part of his reply:
I'm a bit daunted by the distance, both the time and cost of travelling, and working it round kids etc. But I reckon I'd be up for it if I was really into you, if I looked forward to every time we met. I don't know if that could happen, or even if we'll get to the stage of finding out. But I'm up for exploring this further, assuming you are.
Right. If I was really into you? AIBU to think that is a bit twattish? Or am I being ridiculously over-sensitive (ex victim of emotional abuse, keen to never never never repeat the experience again)?
(by the way, while I was composing this epic post, Mr Nice-but-I-don't know-yet called, and we're going out to a nice theatre-y thing on Friday
).