Hi, bellsring. Your post this morning, Thu 06-Oct-11 08:32:49, reminded me of me!
I'm going to quote a bit from this morning's journal ...
The early abuses were tests. I've thought about this very much, but through a slightly different lens. They were tests of my resilience. My "failing" (and this applies to x-boss as well) was not so much malleability as staunchness. That is whay my childhood taught me - to recognise abuse AND STAND UP STRONGLY. Not to run away or even to attack the fucker, but to withstand it and move on ... to the next bout of abuse.
Not a failing then: a misconception.
Here's the most important thing. A man, or woman, who observed such staunchness/resilience to abuse in another and knew how to care (was a decent, functional human being) would feel sympathy and try to prove themselves safe, caring and protective.
What it shows is not empathy. It demosntrates that he saw my vulnerabilities and leveraged them for power. Power over me, though he was pretty much obsessed by power over everybody.
He's a crocodile. Cold, malicious: faulty. He is a psychopath. I'm much better off out, despite the high cost.
... Don't know whether any of that will resonate for you. Might be worth a think? x