This might be a bit of a ramble. I've been thinking about what & who I want to be in the final third of my life, and what I need to learn in order to become it. My answers, oddly, are the same as the ones I had when I was 25, 35, 45. Even more oddly, my 'need to learn' items are all things I thought I had learned - by 35, at the latest.
I remember saying to a very driven boyfriend, who was anxious to reach a certain state of being, "There is no 'there', life isn't a race." I've told numerous partners "I don't want to be with someone who doesn't want me as I am." I have been loved and hated, in equal measures, for my strong ethics and my willingness to flout social expectations. I probably came across, to many people, as confident and wise. And yet - I hadn't enough wisdom to save myself from my internal bully or the outer bullies she attracted. I wasn't confident enough to set and enforce boundaries, or wise enough to hear how my own remarks betrayed the weirdness of my world view.
I feel sad to have learned so much, so well, without understanding what needed to be fixed. I'm in the middle of integrating my old computer system with the new one, so the analogy that springs to my mind is this: Through my 25-45 years, I was installing new software on an old operating system. It appeared to run but, when I worked with it, my output was corrupted. My underlying program didn't understand what my new software was trying to do. It tried its best, but had no way of knowing what the new programs were for. In life, this is what happened with my healthy thoughts & philosophies - I'd taken the new ideas on board, but my operating system (my mind) was not equipped to make them run properly.
There must be a million ways of saying the same thing. I bought some rose plants last autumn, and was amazed to learn they won't grow in soil that has previously been host to certain other plants. Everything needs the right basic conditions before it can flourish.
That's what these threads are about, isn't it? There's so much more to recovery than adopting new ways, new ideas, new concepts. Before the new stuff can work, we have to understand how our old systems were constructed. Without that knowledge, all the new ideas are just words and wind.
This ramble was triggered by a number of small things, some of them in recent posts to this forum. I've decided to post it because it might resonate for some reader, some time - and also because I'd welcome expansions by others!