So week 18 for my sale and week and i think 13 for my purchase (they're not aligned).
I messaged by buyer to see if they wanted all the furniture and to see if we could agree a price. Originally it was being sold as Tenant in Situ with a fully furnished leave including sofa, beds, fridge freezer, television and everything. But 8 weeks into the sale the buyer's solicitors said they wanted it with vacant possession. so everything was held up and caused a lot of suffering and stress as they weren't honest from the start. They blamed the lawyer and changed the lawyer and than sat on their laurels not appointing a new lawyer for a further 5 weeks til i put the flat on the market. It then took a further month for the contract to be passed to their lawyer as the agent supplied my lawyer with incorrect contact details.
They now are saying we said it was fully furnished included in the price. I said the agreement changed when it went from tenants in situ (and they had a furnished lease so i couldn't be bothered to argue about the furnishing and was gonna throw it in fully furnished anyway).
I feel they've lost me a lot of money as i've had to evict the tenants and the delays to them having appointed a lawyer mean my flat with sit unoccupied for several weeks and take a bigger risk if it doesn't go through. And that doesn't even include the increased legal fees due to the change in contracts.
Therefore, not feeling as generous and wanting to charge extra for the furnishings (the fixtures and fittings forms were updated to state this when the sale changed).
Do you think I'm being unreasonable?