Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Primary education

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

DS2 made to fish bottle out of school toilet as punishment

256 replies

citylover · 11/07/2008 12:38

DS2 is in year 2 and he and a friend put a plastic bottle down the toilet, think his friend then went to the toilet, other kids told on them and they were rightly called to account.

As punishment they were made to fish said bottle out of loo (with latex gloves on).

I am really uncomfortable with this type of punishment and have made my concerns known.

In addition my DS has quite serious anxiety issues around using school toilets which I have been trying to overcome over the past few months. The school are aware of these.

My family, and a childless friend think this punishment is fine ("well he won't do it again will he") which made me think perhaps IABU.

However my gut feeling is it isn't the right way of handling it and crosses a line.

He is generally a well behaved child at school - his teacher confirmed this the other night.

OP posts:
MarsLady · 11/07/2008 16:59

MB... I can't afford to buy cake! lol Besides with 5 kids I get them to make it! DD1 makes a mean banana cake and also a rather fab Victoria sponge. DD2 makes excellent apple crumble. I don't let the DTs bake anything... I know where those hands have been. DS1 can cook half a dozen different meals and makes any number of chocolate desserts. Gotta love those children!

But no they wouldn't bake after fishing bottles out of the loo. Not before a deep fumigation

MsDemeanor · 11/07/2008 17:40

I don't think this was crime of the century, which is why I think the OP's ds didn't get punished. I do not consider saying 'Oi, did you put that in there? Please take it out again now' a 'punishment'!
Am I punishing my near-seven year old when I say, 'Oi, why are your socks on the floor? Pop them in the laundry basket please.'? I think not.

FluffyMummy123 · 11/07/2008 17:41

Message withdrawn

mrz · 11/07/2008 17:43

Why should anyone else have to fish it out? They put it there so up to them to remove it IMO

seeker · 11/07/2008 17:56

I would really like one of the people who don't think the school ahs done the right thing to explain why - because I can't see a single reason why it's not a good idea!

Blandmum · 11/07/2008 17:57

and how can it be wrong for the person who put the bottle in the bog to fish it out, but not some other poor sod?

and at 7 they should know better.

Mutt · 11/07/2008 17:59

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

onebatmother · 11/07/2008 18:04

Just skimmed through.. and posting at spee.d

Well, I and citylover are clearly in a minority by some considerable margin..

I'm not feeling overwrought at all, to whoever said I was, btw. and I don't think I was projecting. But I was rather taken aback by the outraged tone of some posts: the anger seemed to increase as the YABUs hit critical mass..

Also I am genuinely surprised how many seem to extrapolate from the OP's and my post that we are bringing up our children to hold support staff in contempt, and to believe that it's someone else's job to clean up their messes.

I don't believe that is the case. If anything, my own ds would be more painfully bludgeoned into conformity by my going on and on and on about his very poor behaviour.

I also in RL veer quite definitely towards punitive parenting - though I aspire to the idea of teaching by example.

But I don't, fundamentally, believe that a child of 7 needs to put his hand in the loo (which he's been told since he was about one to be very wary of doing, because it's dirty and unhealthy) to learn that what he did was wrong.

I think the shcool risked upsetting the child - esp one who is acknowledged by them to have probs with the loos - to a degree beyond the seriousness of the crime.

An older child would be emotionally capable of 'taking the consequences'. A seven-year-old might not be. I wouldn't risk it, myself.

It is not pleasant to put one's hand into piss. But whereas for an adult, it is (I really do acknowledge) disgusting, for a young child it might (and again, I acknowledge that this is a possibility, not a certainty) be disgusting, humiliating, even traumatizing.

I think that it is quite possible to make a child understand they've behaved badly by pointing out that someone else is having to do something very unpleasant to fix their mess - without making them do it themselves. I myself remember feeling very very certain that I would not be doing something quite similar again, as a reaction to the expression of extreme disappointment on her face). A 7 year old is still quite a young child, remember - and in many other circumstances we would all be saying 'but he's still just a baby..'.

So my bottom line (as an adult) is not to do with who should do what in Life, or having no respect for those who do the clearing up - it's that there is a difference between how adults experience a situation, and how children do.

TheFallenMadonna · 11/07/2008 18:04

Well, to be fair both the OP and onebat have said why they don't like it. It's just that most people don't agree with their reasoning.

TheFallenMadonna · 11/07/2008 18:05

Oops - x post!

TheFallenMadonna · 11/07/2008 18:11

DO you mean you would go "on and on and on about his very poor behaviour"? Or did I misunderstand?

I do think that for my children at least, having me do that would be more traumatising than sticking their hand in the loo and hoicking it back out again.

Blandmum · 11/07/2008 18:13

I don't extrapolate that you do raise your kids to hold support staff in contempt, but my post was rather that many children, who are not taught that actions have consequences do.

And the most common example that I have come across with behavior of this type is children who voluntarily make a mess and expect other people to clear up after it.

onebatmother · 11/07/2008 18:14

It's a fault of mine, going on and on. It was a dig at myself, and intended to show that by no means do I consider myself a perfect paretn.

TheProvincialLady · 11/07/2008 18:14

I do understand what you say about how an adult experiences a situation being different from a child. But I really disagree with most of what you say otherwise. I actually think that saying to a child that someone else had to clear up their mess and it was disgusting for them, etc, is much more shame inducing than just getting them to do the job themselves. I don't think the school approached this in the manner of a punishment, but as a lesson - a lesson I would want my 7 year old to learn in the same circumstances.

onebatmother · 11/07/2008 18:17

Can I also, in advance, opt out of being the person to whom you all get shirty with.

We disagree, I understand your position and I've stated mine. But I'm up against it and am not going to be able to argue individually with each of the 137 posts disagreeing me which will follow.

chisigirl · 11/07/2008 18:18

If either of my DC were to do this at 7, I would certainly expect them to have to fish it out, using gloves.

hatrick · 11/07/2008 18:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

BreeVanderCampLGJ · 11/07/2008 18:20

Hold the front page.

Ok have checked with a 7 year old...

He said if it was him and his friend it would be down to him and his friend to fish it out.

He said if the DS of the OP feels funny about school toilets what was doing messing about in them ?

Oh and he also said he he would also expect detention.

Strong sense of right and wrong. And to use an Irish expression, he didn't lick it off the ground.

So I reckon your DS got off lightly.

hatrick · 11/07/2008 18:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

FAQ · 11/07/2008 18:25

I just asked my DS1 (also 7 and in Yr2) what would happen if he and a friend threw a plastic bottle in the toilet at school.

He turned round and straight away said "one of us would be told to take it out" (he answered awfully quickly.........hope he's not done it ).

So same as LGJ

onebatmother · 11/07/2008 18:29

but the fact that every 7 yr old in the country says that that's what would happen, doesm't mean it's right, surely?

hatrick · 11/07/2008 18:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

onebatmother · 11/07/2008 18:30

strong sense of right and wrong perfectly poss without this form of punishment. Mine also has strong sense of r and wr (but in my case he did lick it off the grougd)

myredcardigan · 11/07/2008 18:30

OBM, I totally respect your right to disagree with the sane vast majority but I have to say this is one of those threads where I am genuinely stunned that anyone would think this an inappropriate action by the teacher. Really stunned!

As a teacher you do end up doing some yucky jobs. I've changed the pants and trousers of an 8yr old who soiled himself because he was to shy to ask his supply teacher if he could go to the loo. There was no punishment (even though it could have been avoided) because there was no 'naughty intent' for want of a better phrase. I've also cleaned up after a child who was repeatedly sick both in the classroom and down the corridor. These things happen.

No way would I put my hand down a toilet to fetch something that had been deliberately dropped in there.

hatrick · 11/07/2008 18:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Swipe left for the next trending thread