Very sorry for the loss Ark; thinking of you and your partner xx
Wigwam - we didn't test for DS or DD, and were keen to not test for no 3, but the midwife was rude and pushy, and told us that they'd tell us anyway if there was a problem at the scan, so we may as well get the bloods to get an accurate picture. I was extremely cross, because, for us, it (bloods) made no difference at all if the baby had various disorders that would have been picked up by scan alone. We'd want to know abnormalities at scan, as they might show disorders that would involve very short life expectancy, or operations that needed to be done pre birth (not Downs), but the blood wouldn't add to that knowledge. We didn't 'need' the bloods done, as that would have been more exclusively for Down's, which we didn't feel we needed an 'exact' 'risk' for (we didn't see it as a 'risk', but just as number 3 might be a baby who happened to have Downs).
I think health professionals attitude to Down's stinks (basing this on the conversations now had in three pregnancies about why we didn't feel we needed testing for Downs). In the second pregnancy, we moved hospitals after the midwife told us that Down's 'can be mild, but it can be really, really horrible', in this godawful tone of voice when we said it woudn't make any difference to us is terms of terminations etc. I still feel cross. Really hope this doesn't offend anyone, and it was our own feelings for us, not commentary on anyone else's choices. I'm a bit over-pregnant, and having a rant.