Ninja i too would set a firm leaving date. You know it's going to be a pretty shite day, however much you will be better off apart and I know your DDs will have a hard time that day but from my DP's own experience of leaving a family home, it's better done in a clean break rather than dragging it out.I hope that once it's done, things can start getting better for you.
Thanks for all your comments guys. I find it very difficult to explain things about my need for a homebirth, which is why I find hcps difficult.
notcitrus I'm happy to have the regular urine check for sugar and protein in the urine but it's the full GTT bloods I have an issue with.
This is the problem (and I think I shall dump it all here and then say no more as I clearly have differieng views): I have done lots and lots of research on topics of uterine rupture, c-section prevention, natural childbirth and the tactics hcps use to reduce their risk of litigation.
Whilst uterine rupture is extremely serious (and your poor friend notcitrus - thank goodness things like that are very very rare), the risk of my uterus rupturing in labour is 0.34%. That % includes women who rupture despite not having had a previous section. Sadly some first timers can have uterine rupture too.
Compare that to the risk of, say, cord prolapse, which is also extremely serious, which is 0.7% - double the risk of rupture yet cord prolapse is not a contra indicator for homebirth and no one has mentioned it to me.
Ina May Gaskin, IMO one of the world's leading midwives, also states that of the GTT tests, up to 50-70% are inaccurate and most women would test differently on a 2nd test. There are a number of doctors who now believe gestational diabetes is quite a normal reaction of the body to pregnancy and unless sugars become uncontrollable, it is not serious. Growth scans are also notoriously inaccurate.
Now, having said all of that, the choices women make in pregnancy and labour are normally made with the best interests of the baby at heart and I am in no way criticising anyone's choices here.
However, having done all of my research and not being reckless - if I got actual pre-eclampsia or if there were signs of serious problems during labour, then I would always transfer in. For me though, the risks of being in hospital are actually greater than birthing at home. For me, it's not just about a healthy baby 'at all costs', it's about a healthy mum too and I have turned into one of those 'mother-earth' typyes who believe that mental attitude is linked to the body's ability to birth and that doctors are so afraid of litigation that they wish to manage risk to 0%, which is not possible.
I saw the consultant to get a 3rd scan (they couldn;t see the spine) and she authorised the scan then launched into a tirade of why a homebirth is not advised - she quoted a 1% risk of scar rupture, which is simply not true and the lovely midwives at AIMS have advised me to consider making a formal complaint about this consultant as she should know the facts.
The above is very long and I'm sorry for that. i also know that very few people share my views, which is why I find it very difficult to post on MN about it. I've found a lovely support group on yahoo (VBAC/HBAC group) who give me confidence.
Can you see why i have a hard time explaining it in RL?!
ninja I think I will get everything in writing and make sure I show it to them I think I will go ahead and have the GTT but I'm afraid that if it is a bad result, I will ask for another test firstly, then as long as my blood sugars were controlled, I will still ask for a homebirth.
Ladies, so sorry for storming through thread - ignore me but I had to let it out and I know you guys will (I hope) not judge me too badly.