Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Politics

So who are you rootin' for at Makersfield?

117 replies

NEGUY82 · Yesterday 16:45

Just wondering who everyone hopes will win??

I'm hoping for a Burnham win but as long as it's not Kenyon I can live with it.

OP posts:
Northermcharn · Yesterday 21:53

Firesidechatter · Yesterday 21:22

Anyone but burnham which I think means a tactical win for reform to keep him out.

so I hope the good people of makerfield hold their noses and vote for them, one more reform mp isn’t great but a million times better than burnham as pm.

Yes. And the public who vote reform will with time have further proof they're actually terrible, so hopefully less likely to vote for them in 29.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 21:56

nomoreforks · Yesterday 21:32

Not Burnham. He would disaster for the UK and Labour. If Labour want to win the next election they need to be less left wing and not more. Andy Burnham as PM would lead to a Reform government.

Yes it's not unlikely. If any Labour voters in Makerfield really value the country - they should vote Reform for that reason. But they won't.

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 21:59

Of course they won’t. I’d rather eat my own liver washed down with bleach than vote Reform, so would my bloke who’s voted Tory all this life.

Northermcharn · Yesterday 22:01

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 21:59

Of course they won’t. I’d rather eat my own liver washed down with bleach than vote Reform, so would my bloke who’s voted Tory all this life.

Well exactly..

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 22:02

Exactly what?

Lisacm85 · Yesterday 22:05

itssoeasy · Yesterday 17:05

Labour.

If reform win this country is doomed.

Country is already doomed. Labour are already going a good job of making it worse !

Twiglets1 · Today 04:49

To me the best outcome would be for Burnham to win Makersfield as he seems the best of the candidates who could realistically win there.

But then for Starmer to win the leadership challenge.

Firesidechatter · Today 05:59

This is a local election not a general election, voting reform in this case would be a strategic vote to keep burnham out, it would then make it much less likely reform will win the next general election.

if burnham gets in, we will all be screwed even more than we are now. Think it’s bad now, think you’re skint. You’ve seen nothing compared to what thay man’s going to do.

Squirrel001 · Today 06:22

I genuinely have no idea how Labour attract a single vote. It is so depressing.

Level1469 · Today 06:28

I hope Count Binface wipes the floor with them 😂 More ethics than all the rest put together.

Pmsl the posters slagging off Reform in favour of the grooming gang supporting party.

Mandelson affair just a distant memory?

Paravion011 · Today 06:31

I want Burnham to win, solely so that he can then challenge and defeat Starmer.

My thesis thereafter is that Burnham is such a disaster as PM, we subsequently get an early GE, whereby Labour can be booted into the wilderness - preferably for eternity, but I would settle for my lifetime…

Watdidyousay · Today 07:00

BIossomtoes · Yesterday 21:59

Of course they won’t. I’d rather eat my own liver washed down with bleach than vote Reform, so would my bloke who’s voted Tory all this life.

You wouldn't though would you.

TallSturdyGirls · Today 07:03

Northermcharn · Yesterday 17:26

'I think this is not fair to the constituents. Their constituency is being used to play games for the Labour party. Who wants an MP that is only standing so he can become party leader and PM? '

Quite - the sheer contempt the Labour party and Burnham are showing to the electorate in Makerfield, and possibly wider, is actually disgusting.

Reform and restore will have their vote split, so it looks like Labour will win anyway.

Frankly it's all a shit show and the people coming last are us. The tax payers, the electorate, when we're possibly forced to have Burnham as an unelected PM.

The Labour party are definitely Not using their powers in our interest. and we're paying for them. Awful grubby little electorate manipulating tax grabbers.

Edited

Not quite sure why you i'm getting so worked up about the unelected bit. Im 50 I think 7 out of the 11 PMs in my lifetime have been "unelected" at the time they took office. (Callahan, Major. Brown, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak).

And thanks fuck we didn't have an election every single time. The cost and waste of effort would be ridiculous.

Watdidyousay · Today 07:03

Paravion011 · Today 06:31

I want Burnham to win, solely so that he can then challenge and defeat Starmer.

My thesis thereafter is that Burnham is such a disaster as PM, we subsequently get an early GE, whereby Labour can be booted into the wilderness - preferably for eternity, but I would settle for my lifetime…

Honestly..Starmer or Burnham...I think it mskes little difference Labouare doomed.

BIossomtoes · Today 07:04

Watdidyousay · Today 07:00

You wouldn't though would you.

I wouldn’t what? It’s an indication of how likely I’d be to vote for Reform.

Watdidyousay · Today 07:07

BIossomtoes · Today 07:04

I wouldn’t what? It’s an indication of how likely I’d be to vote for Reform.

Eat your own liver and drink bleach. What a thing to say.

Paravion011 · Today 07:09

Watdidyousay · Today 07:03

Honestly..Starmer or Burnham...I think it mskes little difference Labouare doomed.

Yes, accept Starmer represents death by a thousand cuts whilst Burnham would hopefully accelerate Labour’s demise.

Paravion011 · Today 07:10

Watdidyousay · Today 07:07

Eat your own liver and drink bleach. What a thing to say.

The PP is a bedfellow with hyperbole.

TallSturdyGirls · Today 07:12

Paravion011 · Today 06:31

I want Burnham to win, solely so that he can then challenge and defeat Starmer.

My thesis thereafter is that Burnham is such a disaster as PM, we subsequently get an early GE, whereby Labour can be booted into the wilderness - preferably for eternity, but I would settle for my lifetime…

What do you think Labour has done that is so bad compared to what the Tories did?
I haven't loved them, but compared to the absolute scandal years of the Tories, PPE stolen billions, the parties, Brexit, Truss trashing the economy, small boats, austerity wrecking the NHS and public services, allowing our councils to become bankcrupt, the increasing divide between rich and poor, no house building etc). At least they are bringing waiting lists down, got rid of zero hour contracts, which has been destroying my family, sorted out the train disputes, bringing back trains into public hands (thank fuck)

In my lifetime the Tories put so many things into private ownership that have been since destroyed (water, rail, buses, utilities,) so that all of the profits from these went into the hands of shareholders rather than being used to fix the services. Reform want to do that more.

Paravion011 · Today 07:13

TallSturdyGirls · Today 07:12

What do you think Labour has done that is so bad compared to what the Tories did?
I haven't loved them, but compared to the absolute scandal years of the Tories, PPE stolen billions, the parties, Brexit, Truss trashing the economy, small boats, austerity wrecking the NHS and public services, allowing our councils to become bankcrupt, the increasing divide between rich and poor, no house building etc). At least they are bringing waiting lists down, got rid of zero hour contracts, which has been destroying my family, sorted out the train disputes, bringing back trains into public hands (thank fuck)

In my lifetime the Tories put so many things into private ownership that have been since destroyed (water, rail, buses, utilities,) so that all of the profits from these went into the hands of shareholders rather than being used to fix the services. Reform want to do that more.

14 years including Brexit and a Pandemic.
vs
Less than two years.

For starters.

Mykneesareshot · Today 07:16

Reform

TallSturdyGirls · Today 07:31

Paravion011 · Today 07:13

14 years including Brexit and a Pandemic.
vs
Less than two years.

For starters.

So what have they done so bad in that time? I mean, it's not much time to fix all the fuck ups, and they have made some massive errors. But nothing on the scale of the tories. Truss managed to destroy the economy in 49 days

Dollymylove · Today 07:43

Giggorata · Yesterday 17:15

Not Burnham, who as pointed out, is a careerist, plus isn't he another politician who failed to pursue dealing with the grooming/rape gangs in Manchester?

Yes he is , with bells on 😵‍💫

EasternStandard · Today 07:51

Paravion011 · Today 06:31

I want Burnham to win, solely so that he can then challenge and defeat Starmer.

My thesis thereafter is that Burnham is such a disaster as PM, we subsequently get an early GE, whereby Labour can be booted into the wilderness - preferably for eternity, but I would settle for my lifetime…

If Burnham doesn’t win Starmer could be on the ropes anyway. It would show his leadership can’t beat Reform, which will make his party react.

But Burnham is a surer path to a contest so I’m fine with that.

Nuthatch26 · Today 08:29

TallSturdyGirls · Today 07:12

What do you think Labour has done that is so bad compared to what the Tories did?
I haven't loved them, but compared to the absolute scandal years of the Tories, PPE stolen billions, the parties, Brexit, Truss trashing the economy, small boats, austerity wrecking the NHS and public services, allowing our councils to become bankcrupt, the increasing divide between rich and poor, no house building etc). At least they are bringing waiting lists down, got rid of zero hour contracts, which has been destroying my family, sorted out the train disputes, bringing back trains into public hands (thank fuck)

In my lifetime the Tories put so many things into private ownership that have been since destroyed (water, rail, buses, utilities,) so that all of the profits from these went into the hands of shareholders rather than being used to fix the services. Reform want to do that more.

A lot of what you have listed is lies told by Labour in order to win the election.
This thread isn't about the previous govt, and I don't want to derail, but you should fact check rather than just accept Labour soundbites. Labour are not building more houses to give you one example, and NHS spending continued to rise throughout austerity. I don't believe this Labour govt would have been any better economically through the pandemic, and they have quietly written off a few billion they promised to recover from covid loan fraud.

WFA, employer NI, farmers tax, PS Vat, Chagos, inflation going from 2% to 3.8% within their first year, rising unemployment - particularly for young people, rising welfare spending, scrapping the two child cap, - examples of why Labour became so unpopular in record time. Much of it wasn't in their manifesto either. Then we had the Mandelson stuff.