Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Charlie Kirk's beliefs

1000 replies

MsAmerica · 15/09/2025 02:29

If You're Wondering What Charlie Kirk Believed In, Here Are 14 Real Quotes
In light of his death, Charlie Kirk's legacy is being remembered through these viral quotes.
BuzzFeed

https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexalisitza/viral-charlie-kirk-quotes

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
TheClaaaw · 19/09/2025 12:52

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 12:24

The inability of so many posters on here who are laughing at the death of a young man who had two young children and a wife just shows how far gone YOU are from being able to be a normal member of a society that functions.

Your arguments don't make sense and haven't been thought through. You take aim at someone for apparently taking away women's rights and making them give birth?
What planet are you from where this makes sense? You'd rather it be the case that women are allowed to go around killing their own children because they're an inconvenience?

The lack of humanity is FRIGHTENING. It's hard to find anyone in these times who even comes close to having the moral righteousness of a man like Charlie Kirk let alone the level of intelligence and intellectual ability in general is utterly insurpassable. As we are mostly women on here I have to assume it's our uncontrollable hormone levels that cause such irrational emotion based responses as it gives me no confidence that we have any business at all claiming to hold any positions of power anywhere any more. What a catastrophe this would be. I hope men from far and wide are able to see what wretched people women on here can be and hopefully they'll think twice about letting women have any more power than they've been given up to now.

Wow. That comment tells posters here everything they need to know about your supposed “morality”. You’re actually defending child abuse of a raped minor who is ten years old by her being forced to go through pregnancy of the baby of her paedophile rapist to term and have to give birth to it. Think for a second what that would mean for that little girl - already the traumatised victim of child rape - and her tiny body, having to be heavily pregnant and terrified and go through the pain of birth (and hugely increased medical risks to her that come with such a small child who is NOT AN ADULT WOMAN going through that process) and the ridicule and bullying by other children as well that would also occur, and then by force becoming a mother aged TEN to the baby of her rapist. You are referring to her as a “woman” and saying that the collection of cells should be given more concern than the actual child who has already been traumatised and abused and accusing her of “murdering a baby” if she doesn’t want to have the paedophile rapist’s child and advocating to inflict MORE abuse on her.

I don’t know how people can live with themselves when advocating such undeniable child abuse. It’s disgusting.

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 12:53

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 12:49

They really don’t, he lived and died a hated bigot, but please go on deluding yourself!

They really do, people are leaving the US Democrat party in droves because of the attitudes displayed by you an others.

Your hate and continued lies just make it worse.

You'll see.

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 12:55

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 12:53

They really do, people are leaving the US Democrat party in droves because of the attitudes displayed by you an others.

Your hate and continued lies just make it worse.

You'll see.

He was a misogynistic, racist, bigot. How sad you view this as aspirational.

Thoughts and prayers to you.

TheClaaaw · 19/09/2025 12:55

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 11:48

Because it's relevant to the country as a whole AND to the black community. If black people as a community want to have better living standards it's important to consider and to be informed that black people are committing a disproportionate amount of the violent crime occurring. For example, he's noted that black people commit 50% of ALL murders! That's an issue, and it's not one that can be solved simply by the back community screaming racism when no evidence for such exists.

More whataboutery. That doesn’t justify the comment of “blacks prowling the streets”. Nor does it explain why Mr Kirk was entirely unconcerned about the fact that MEN commit 98% of murders. Why did he choose race as the issue to focus on and not talk about “men prowling the streets”, given that there is a far higher correlation between violent crime and men than there is between violent crime and race? How strange.

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 12:57

AzurePanda · 19/09/2025 12:41

Hi @Alicealig , I don’t agree with a lot of your views as I’m an atheist and am pro choice (although I absolutely decry the recent change in the law here to allow abortion up until birth). However I really appreciated Charlie Kirk’s efforts to engage with young people and encourage open debate. His murder has made me reflect on religion and what its demise in western societies has meant. He did a lot of good in terms of opening up dialogue.

I'm just getting frustrated by the types of people celebrating his murder because they claim not to like his views and their absolute inability for self - reflection and to realise they are amongst the bad-people they claim deserve violence. It's utterly dispicable. They're clearly only young. But very dangerous nonetheless.

Im not sure I fully understand your stance on abortion however, and why you are pro choice, yet decry the recent changes in abortion law up to birth. Why shouldn't choice trump then? My stance isn't necessarily religious but is sound as far as science is concerned. We know your life and everyone elses begins at conception. Whether you are inside or outside the womb is immaterial. What makes it bad that abortion is being allowed up until birth? Why is human life more valuable at that point than say, 2 months before birth? What I'm trying to say is at what point does human life become valuable? The pro choice side seem to almost overvalue life once it's born. What about when a baby is born before the nurse is able to get it to open it's eyes and before it's first breath? Should it be illegal to slaughter it there and then if the mother were to suddenly decide she didn't want it? These are important specific questions I don't know how the pro choice people manage to answer cohesively. Either human life has value or it doesn't. It's as simple as that.

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 12:58

There seems to be in influx of far right men posting from the US over the last week or so, posting extreme views and personal attacks on threads such as this. We see you.

TheClaaaw · 19/09/2025 13:00

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 12:44

Claw,

Millions of more people love and miss Charlie Kirk than you can imagine, an incredibly large number of those are non-white.

Your anger is a result of being exposed.

You miss someone you’ve never met?

Please explain how you think I have been “exposed”?

Bizarre.

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 13:02

@Alicealig You don’t seem to care about basic human rights, let alone women’s rights, considering you think it’s perfectly moral and okay to force a 10 year old child to give birth to a rapists baby. Do you have any idea of the physical and mental trauma this would cause? Women have fought for such a long time to have rights and autonomy over their bodies.

Shame on you.

Underthinker · 19/09/2025 13:03

TheClaaaw · 19/09/2025 09:54

17/09/25 09:51 Underthinker

I’ve said I don’t know if hes [sic] racist or not. I might look into the “prowling blacks”comment later.

18/09/25 08:21 Underthinker

I would need to trawl hours of footage to find the exact quotes mentioned, and see what the context is. There are dozens of them and each will have 5 or 10 minutes of relevant footage around it.

18/09/25 09:14 Underthinker

As for “prowling blacks” I said I hadn’t looked into it, because I only have limited time, and it takes time to go through all these accusations & respond to them.

Yet in the 24 hours since that last quoted post you’ve had time to make a further 19 posts on this thread yet allegedly still “not had time to look into it”. How very convenient.

I’m afraid it is perfectly clear that your level of dishonesty about what you have posted, which is clearly evidenced in the thread for all to see, is very similar to the dishonest manner in which you have engaged in the discussions about Kirk with your increasingly less plausible attempts to justify his comments, combined with constantly trying to accuse other posters of being dishonest when it’s perfectly clear who is the person doing so.

Out of interest, do you think there was the some nominative determinism involved in your choice of username?

Sorry I missed this delight of a reply earlier. Not sure what you're trying to prove with the timeline there. I said i hadnt seen a particular video yet, and that seeing every one that had been referenced would take a long time - it would.

Yet in the 24 hours since that last quoted post you’ve had time to make a further 19 posts on this thread yet allegedly still “not had time to look into it”. How very convenient.

I have watched it. As it had been mentioned several times by you and your fellow witch hunters, I sought it out last night, watched it and gave my thoughts somewhere around 8:30 last night. Don't worry, no apology necessary.

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 13:04

At this stage, given the levels of lies and hate, real hate - I wonder if those portraying that hate have been affected by dark forces.

TheClaaaw · 19/09/2025 13:04

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 12:58

There seems to be in influx of far right men posting from the US over the last week or so, posting extreme views and personal attacks on threads such as this. We see you.

Absolutely. They probably think they can target Mumsnet because most posters here are just intellectually inferior women, after all, so should be easily influenced by incoherent nonsense posted by far superior men, hence their anger when intelligent women have made moderate, calm and well-reasoned arguments to which they have no rational response to offer and tiresome attempts to disparage individual posters with facile and transparent ad hominem attacks instead.

To use a more US centric phraseology: lame.

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 13:05

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 13:02

@Alicealig You don’t seem to care about basic human rights, let alone women’s rights, considering you think it’s perfectly moral and okay to force a 10 year old child to give birth to a rapists baby. Do you have any idea of the physical and mental trauma this would cause? Women have fought for such a long time to have rights and autonomy over their bodies.

Shame on you.

You're aware that this is a hypothetical situation and hasn't actually happened under Charlie Kirk's direction........

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 13:05

TheClaaaw · 19/09/2025 12:55

More whataboutery. That doesn’t justify the comment of “blacks prowling the streets”. Nor does it explain why Mr Kirk was entirely unconcerned about the fact that MEN commit 98% of murders. Why did he choose race as the issue to focus on and not talk about “men prowling the streets”, given that there is a far higher correlation between violent crime and men than there is between violent crime and race? How strange.

I see. So we know there is a fundamental difference between us when it comes to sex in that males are very different to females and that men are inherently more aggressive and therefore commit more violence.

Are you actually saying there is an inherent difference between black and white people and that blacks are just more criminal than whites by nature so we just accept that, as it sounds like that's the comparison you're making. We weren't even talking about percentages of men we were talking about race..... Yes?

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 13:07

And men committing a high percent of murders is normal statistics that are repeatable the world over. That's not specific to the US. Black crime proportionality is.

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 13:08

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 13:07

And men committing a high percent of murders is normal statistics that are repeatable the world over. That's not specific to the US. Black crime proportionality is.

Begot by the lack of Black fathers, Charlie used to talk about this and the need for black young men to have their fathers in their lives.

Underthinker · 19/09/2025 13:10

TheClaaaw · 19/09/2025 13:04

Absolutely. They probably think they can target Mumsnet because most posters here are just intellectually inferior women, after all, so should be easily influenced by incoherent nonsense posted by far superior men, hence their anger when intelligent women have made moderate, calm and well-reasoned arguments to which they have no rational response to offer and tiresome attempts to disparage individual posters with facile and transparent ad hominem attacks instead.

To use a more US centric phraseology: lame.

I can't commment on the motives of far right American men, but as a British lefty man, I can say I come onto MN to listen to what the high concentration of fiercely intelligent courageous women on the FWR board have to say.

Notonthestairs · 19/09/2025 13:11

"As we are mostly women on here I have to assume it's our uncontrollable hormone levels that cause such irrational emotion based responses as it gives me no confidence that we have any business at all claiming to hold any positions of power anywhere any more. What a catastrophe this would be. I hope men from far and wide are able to see what wretched people women on here can be and hopefully they'll think twice about letting women have any more power than they've been given up to now."

What drivel.

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 13:12

Everything is just anger when it comes to the left. They assume everything is combattive and are unaware that someone like Charlie came from a good place. Social media has replaced these leftists ability to read human body language, they're totally inept when interpreting human interactions as they're always texting and behind a screen. It's no wonder they struggle with relationships and mental health.

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 13:15

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 13:05

You're aware that this is a hypothetical situation and hasn't actually happened under Charlie Kirk's direction........

This is what he promoted, and wanted to happen. Forced pregnancies, including for children and rape victims. Even his own daughter. Women are to have to rights or body autonomy, according to Kirk.

Those of us who are feminists and care about women’s rights, and the rights of marginalised groups, are witches according to you. When actually we’ve made many rationale, logical and coherent arguments now for many people’s should you wish to actually engage and read them.

But you won’t, as you are intransigent with your extreme views. The only thing you can offer is hyperbole and personal insults. It’s water off a ducks back 🦆

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 13:16

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 13:12

Everything is just anger when it comes to the left. They assume everything is combattive and are unaware that someone like Charlie came from a good place. Social media has replaced these leftists ability to read human body language, they're totally inept when interpreting human interactions as they're always texting and behind a screen. It's no wonder they struggle with relationships and mental health.

I'm repeating myself but with some of the things I've seen from left since the murder of Charlie Kirk, well, the world "satanic" keeps entering my thoughts.

It's such a shame that we've lost a generation of young people to hate and I hope that those responsible get judged for it one day.

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 13:19

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 13:15

This is what he promoted, and wanted to happen. Forced pregnancies, including for children and rape victims. Even his own daughter. Women are to have to rights or body autonomy, according to Kirk.

Those of us who are feminists and care about women’s rights, and the rights of marginalised groups, are witches according to you. When actually we’ve made many rationale, logical and coherent arguments now for many people’s should you wish to actually engage and read them.

But you won’t, as you are intransigent with your extreme views. The only thing you can offer is hyperbole and personal insults. It’s water off a ducks back 🦆

Did it happen? Did he promote it or did he just say that's what he'd do?

Charlie held the sanctify of life dear, you seem to hate it.

Charlie may have acted very differently if in fact his daughter had to suffer that.

You're so full of hate on just an idea, it's shocking to read.

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 13:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 13:21

Alicealig · 19/09/2025 13:12

Everything is just anger when it comes to the left. They assume everything is combattive and are unaware that someone like Charlie came from a good place. Social media has replaced these leftists ability to read human body language, they're totally inept when interpreting human interactions as they're always texting and behind a screen. It's no wonder they struggle with relationships and mental health.

I’m happily married and I am a psychologist, thanks for enquiring into my wellbeing 😄

I think what would vastly help your well being, as well as your critical thinking and debating skills, would be to stop creating binaries and labelling people into ‘left’ and ‘right’ and relying on lazy stereotypes to create a cheap argument. Also to have the self awareness to recognise that you don’t know what anyone else thinks. All you are doing by using these lazy narratives is creating more division and polarisation.

You can engage with a debate without having to attempt to label and pigeon hole everything and everyone. Nuance is important. Something tells me it’ll be a hot day in hell before you can provide a reasonable, cohesive argument though that isn’t based on underhand tactics and more stereotyping and mind reading.

Notonthestairs · 19/09/2025 13:21

Notonthestairs · 19/09/2025 13:11

"As we are mostly women on here I have to assume it's our uncontrollable hormone levels that cause such irrational emotion based responses as it gives me no confidence that we have any business at all claiming to hold any positions of power anywhere any more. What a catastrophe this would be. I hope men from far and wide are able to see what wretched people women on here can be and hopefully they'll think twice about letting women have any more power than they've been given up to now."

What drivel.

Sorry, I meant to say misogynistic drivel.

Plastictreees · 19/09/2025 13:23

ColdSalads · 19/09/2025 13:19

Did it happen? Did he promote it or did he just say that's what he'd do?

Charlie held the sanctify of life dear, you seem to hate it.

Charlie may have acted very differently if in fact his daughter had to suffer that.

You're so full of hate on just an idea, it's shocking to read.

You are obsessed with projecting the hate you so clearly feel, onto me.

These are the abhorrent things Kirk stood for, which you endorse. Thoughts and prayers to you!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.