Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Starmer Must Go

802 replies

BisiBodi · 13/05/2025 08:37

I made a lengthy post yesterday (on this thread: www.mumsnet.com/talk/politics/5333405-changes-to-immigration-rules-announced-by-starmer?page=2 @ 17:43 if you want to read it) regarding the horrendous "island of strangers" speech by Starmer
Today, Kier Starmer has decided to say that immigration has done "incalculable damage" to the country. My despair and fury over this, and the general direction of labour, warrants its own thread.

Starmer claimed in writing that immigrants have put too much pressure on housing and public services (they don't, and he previously said they don't). He added that the immigration system is “almost designed to permit abuse” and that it risks “pulling the country apart”. He said that he wanted to close a “squalid chapter” in our country’s history (of too much immigration in the last few years), and then he seemed to quote the Rivers of Blood speech and said that without significantly reducing immigration the UK risks becoming “an island of strangers".

He's doing this because he's proposing new laws to make immigration harder and bring net migration down (except they definitely won't). Stuff like increasing it to 10 years before you can apply for indefinite leave to remain (10 years!!), introducing English language tests (in a post that suggests Welsh doesn't exist), reducing social care visas (the system would collapse in a day), being tougher on overseas students and reducing the time they can stay after graduation (if you reduce their numbers at all then Universities will be bankrupt immediately), new ID cards, reduce (oh sorry, "clarify") the amount ECHR article 8 can be used to justify people staying on human rights grounds, etc.

When someone pointed out that high migration helps economies and low hurts them, and that this is true in the EU right now and all over the world, Starmer didn't think so. He said that immigration has been high in the UK but the economy has been stagnant, so there can't be any link. Yes Keir, but the economy was stagnant during A PANDEMIC AND ENERGY CRISIS AND COST OF LIVING CRISIS AND EXPENSIVE NEW WARS AND GLOBAL MARKET TRUMP TURMOIL. If the immigrants hadn't kept us level, your "stagnant" economy would have plummeted like a rock. You cannot possibly be presenting that as X=Y in a total vacuum.

This kind of xenophobia doesn't need explaining, but it's worth saying why it won't work and will lose Labour a lot of votes:

  • Conservative and Reform voters do NOT change their vote to Labour ever, so this pandering is worthless. But Labour can lose votes to the Greens and LDs at a high rate. Nearly ALL the Reform votes come from former Conservatives.
  • Public concern about immigration is low and goes up and down exactly with how much the press is currently going on about it (see the graph) so is not worth alienating your voter base about
  • And it is alienating voters, because you've heard this kind of rhetoric before but it was from the actual NF and BNP
  • The Mail's headline today was still attacking Labour because it is impossible to ever go far enough for them, or for Reform voters. Nothing is ever enough.

So, Labour saying "Reform are right actually" won't bring a single voter over to Labour, but it sure will lose you a few. Or, er, a lot. People are resigning their Labour membership and sounding furious. I haven't seen a single event trigger this much outrage from the public (and Labour MPs) in quite a while. Starmer has hugely damaged himself. Germany's far-right AfD are praising him, that's the level it's at.

I already left for the Greens, but today has me going even further. I think it's now worth the potential chaos to get rid of Starmer's version of Labour. In a timely article today, Nesrine Malik called our current elections "hostage politics". You MUST vote Labour or the Tories will get in. Now you MUST vote Labour or Reform will get in.

I don't respond well to threats. Never have. I tend to escalate. And I'm bored of their crap: more cuts, keeping first-past-the-post even though Labour members want PR, refusing to talk about rejoining the EU even though Labour members (and the majority of the country) want full rejoin, this xenophobic shit which goes against everything Starmer said about immigration when he was running for leader (but then he's broken every pledge from that time), the anti-trans bollocks, coming for the disabled PIP and saying all benefits are too high and that people are taking advantage of handouts and all the rest.

Fuck these guys. There's pragmatic politics where you compromise, and then there's this literal far-right shit that means you personally HAVE to be comfortable with saying it in public. It's about the soul of the PM and the party. Today is way over the line of sensible cross-party anything.

And I'm done with hostage politics. What, so we keep Labour in for 8 more years of... this? Of the same or more cuts? I'm rapidly approaching the point where smashing this Labour party so that they never try to be centre- / far-right again would do more good than the short-term harm.

Voters didn't show unwavering support for Labour at the last election, they showed that they will be extremely flexible and vote for whoever can win in their area. If Labour become unpopular in the polls, that will be someone else and not them. Labour's lead is incredibly fragile and changeable and today's performance is EXACTLY how they lose it and deserve to lose it. Yes, some young men went to Reform before the election... and twice as many young women went to the Greens. Labour's share fell 21% in 18-24 year olds. You cannot gain a single Reform vote by going right. It will never be far-right enough.
Saying that Reform are correct and using their rhetoric in speeches and changing your policies to theirs is NOT how you defeat them, or run a country.

Replace Starmer, quickly. At the very least.

And so what is the purpose of this thread, other than to vent into an online echo-chamber? I think it's a request to a call to action. It's a call out to everyone who currently resides - whether you like it or not - in a Labour controlled constituency and has a labour MP.

You can easily find out the details, together with links to their speeches and/or voting records, from service such as They Work For You.
Check the details of your MP, and especially their stance on immigration and other matters important to you, then email them.

TheyWorkForYou: Hansard and Official Reports for the UK Parliament, Scottish Parliament, and Northern Ireland Assembly - done right

Making it easy to keep an eye on the UK’s parliaments. Discover who represents you, how they’ve voted and what they’ve said in debates.

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:04

PandoraSocks · 19/05/2025 13:58

You have a very strange view of working class people.

Even if no working class kid is ever told directly about Erasmus or any other yourh mobility initiatives, the information will be at the fingertips of any young person who might be wondering how they can widen their horizons. Or do you think working class children have no aspirations and don't know how to use the Internet?

No, I have worked with these kids for over 20 years in Red Wall areas. Of course WC aren't 1 homogeneous group but the enritled assertion that Erasmus will miraculously provide all these opportunities for WC kids is bullshit

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:05

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 13:50

Most don't now. They were all cut.

There is a legal obligation for schools to provide a Careers advice to their students, Education (Careers Guidance in Schools) Act 2022. This duty applies form year 7 to year 13 (college leaving age).

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 14:07

Nobody is talking about miracles. We are talking about removing some barriers that Brexit created

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:07

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:04

No, I have worked with these kids for over 20 years in Red Wall areas. Of course WC aren't 1 homogeneous group but the enritled assertion that Erasmus will miraculously provide all these opportunities for WC kids is bullshit

Why is it "entitled"- that doesn't make any sense?

bombastix · 19/05/2025 14:11

Araminta1003 · 19/05/2025 12:06

I also think forget about the Red Wall voters.
The more interesting question is the young voters. And Reform are plugged into the social media somehow. And that is where Labour need to make strides.
Youth mobility is good for the young. My DC are happy about it, they are not anti immigration, they want opportunity and flexibility and they are all voting in the next election (bar the youngest).

Reform have a very good media operation! Impressive. I would agree with you that Labour need to think about that.

PandoraSocks · 19/05/2025 14:17

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:04

No, I have worked with these kids for over 20 years in Red Wall areas. Of course WC aren't 1 homogeneous group but the enritled assertion that Erasmus will miraculously provide all these opportunities for WC kids is bullshit

But it will benefit some working class kids. A quick Google tells me there is extra support for disadvantaged kids in the form of Erasmus+.

EasternStandard · 19/05/2025 14:17

PandoraSocks · 19/05/2025 13:58

You have a very strange view of working class people.

Even if no working class kid is ever told directly about Erasmus or any other yourh mobility initiatives, the information will be at the fingertips of any young person who might be wondering how they can widen their horizons. Or do you think working class children have no aspirations and don't know how to use the Internet?

I don’t think it’s strange. The pp clearly has experience working in this area.

PandoraSocks · 19/05/2025 14:21

EasternStandard · 19/05/2025 14:17

I don’t think it’s strange. The pp clearly has experience working in this area.

Oh. That trumps the lived experience of working class people. OK.

EasternStandard · 19/05/2025 14:23

PandoraSocks · 19/05/2025 14:21

Oh. That trumps the lived experience of working class people. OK.

I see. Are your posts representing the lived experience of all working class people?

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:26

EasternStandard · 19/05/2025 14:17

I don’t think it’s strange. The pp clearly has experience working in this area.

Well it is inaccurate, just like their statement about Careers advice is. Do you have children of this age, anecdotally I know quite a few of my eldest teen's friends are welcoming this change.

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:28

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:26

Well it is inaccurate, just like their statement about Careers advice is. Do you have children of this age, anecdotally I know quite a few of my eldest teen's friends are welcoming this change.

And are those friends WC in Red Wall? Or are they MC?

That's my point, it was portrayed by a PP as being a positive for Red Wall voters. Which is blatantly isn't

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:32

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:26

Well it is inaccurate, just like their statement about Careers advice is. Do you have children of this age, anecdotally I know quite a few of my eldest teen's friends are welcoming this change.

Re: careers advice

https://feweek.co.uk/ofsted-schools-and-colleges-must-improve-poor-careers-advice/

According to Sutton Trust, 36% of kids don't have access to any form of careers advice

Ofsted: Schools and colleges must improve 'poor' careers

Schools and colleges have been criticised by Ofsted for “poor” levels of collaboration in ensuring disadvantaged students have good careers advice.

https://feweek.co.uk/ofsted-schools-and-colleges-must-improve-poor-careers-advice/

EasternStandard · 19/05/2025 14:34

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:26

Well it is inaccurate, just like their statement about Careers advice is. Do you have children of this age, anecdotally I know quite a few of my eldest teen's friends are welcoming this change.

The pp isn’t inaccurate clearly, they’re not making it up, they work with those dc. I do have dc this age and one thing I learnt from Brexit is you can be surrounded by nearly all remainers and the vote can still go the other way.

That’s how areas work. You can feel people generally feel the same, but somewhere else they don’t.

PandoraSocks · 19/05/2025 14:35

There does seem to be some initiatives on that front. I don't know how successful it is or has been, though there is some info here:

https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/eche/integration-and-equal-access-for-students-within-the-erasmus-programme

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:35

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:26

Well it is inaccurate, just like their statement about Careers advice is. Do you have children of this age, anecdotally I know quite a few of my eldest teen's friends are welcoming this change.

I have posted evidence to support my assertions. Can you?

MyNameIsX · 19/05/2025 14:38

EasternStandard · 19/05/2025 14:23

I see. Are your posts representing the lived experience of all working class people?

Great retort.

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:42

You have referenced an article from the Spectator, well known for its lack of bias🙄 but very well known for highlighting the Catastrophists' right wing alarm at anything good. Can't you find any good in this new policy?

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:44

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:42

You have referenced an article from the Spectator, well known for its lack of bias🙄 but very well known for highlighting the Catastrophists' right wing alarm at anything good. Can't you find any good in this new policy?

Everything has bias by the way.

Yes I support Erasmus.
What i am argumming against is the PP assertion that this would be a benefit for kids from Red Wall areas and that they should be grateful to Labour for that

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:45

EasternStandard · 19/05/2025 14:34

The pp isn’t inaccurate clearly, they’re not making it up, they work with those dc. I do have dc this age and one thing I learnt from Brexit is you can be surrounded by nearly all remainers and the vote can still go the other way.

That’s how areas work. You can feel people generally feel the same, but somewhere else they don’t.

Sorry the law is inaccurate, so you can just pick and choose to comply with laws, what about safeguarding in schools, no money so we don't oblige. I know the law better than that poster does when it comes to the Education sector.

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:46

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 14:45

Sorry the law is inaccurate, so you can just pick and choose to comply with laws, what about safeguarding in schools, no money so we don't oblige. I know the law better than that poster does when it comes to the Education sector.

Well then 36% of schools are breaking the law!!
There simply isn't the funding, or teachers, to meet that legal requirement.

jasflowers · 19/05/2025 14:46

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:04

No, I have worked with these kids for over 20 years in Red Wall areas. Of course WC aren't 1 homogeneous group but the enritled assertion that Erasmus will miraculously provide all these opportunities for WC kids is bullshit

Plenty of working class people used Erasmus, as they did FOM and working abroad, 100k brits worked in tourism in Europe pre brexit.

If you do indeed work with disadvantage kids, why are you against giving them more opportunities and only having these for wealthy ones, as has been the case since Brexit.

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:52

jasflowers · 19/05/2025 14:46

Plenty of working class people used Erasmus, as they did FOM and working abroad, 100k brits worked in tourism in Europe pre brexit.

If you do indeed work with disadvantage kids, why are you against giving them more opportunities and only having these for wealthy ones, as has been the case since Brexit.

I'm not against it, I support Erasmus. My reply was in response to PP saying it will benefit kids in Red Wall areas and that they should be grateful to Labour for an opportunity that is majority taken up by MC kids

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 14:53

Turing scheme already exists, how many WC kids currently take advantage of that?

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 14:55

Pet passports are agreed, no benefits to non pet owners, so shall we just get rid again?