Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Starmer Must Go

802 replies

BisiBodi · 13/05/2025 08:37

I made a lengthy post yesterday (on this thread: www.mumsnet.com/talk/politics/5333405-changes-to-immigration-rules-announced-by-starmer?page=2 @ 17:43 if you want to read it) regarding the horrendous "island of strangers" speech by Starmer
Today, Kier Starmer has decided to say that immigration has done "incalculable damage" to the country. My despair and fury over this, and the general direction of labour, warrants its own thread.

Starmer claimed in writing that immigrants have put too much pressure on housing and public services (they don't, and he previously said they don't). He added that the immigration system is “almost designed to permit abuse” and that it risks “pulling the country apart”. He said that he wanted to close a “squalid chapter” in our country’s history (of too much immigration in the last few years), and then he seemed to quote the Rivers of Blood speech and said that without significantly reducing immigration the UK risks becoming “an island of strangers".

He's doing this because he's proposing new laws to make immigration harder and bring net migration down (except they definitely won't). Stuff like increasing it to 10 years before you can apply for indefinite leave to remain (10 years!!), introducing English language tests (in a post that suggests Welsh doesn't exist), reducing social care visas (the system would collapse in a day), being tougher on overseas students and reducing the time they can stay after graduation (if you reduce their numbers at all then Universities will be bankrupt immediately), new ID cards, reduce (oh sorry, "clarify") the amount ECHR article 8 can be used to justify people staying on human rights grounds, etc.

When someone pointed out that high migration helps economies and low hurts them, and that this is true in the EU right now and all over the world, Starmer didn't think so. He said that immigration has been high in the UK but the economy has been stagnant, so there can't be any link. Yes Keir, but the economy was stagnant during A PANDEMIC AND ENERGY CRISIS AND COST OF LIVING CRISIS AND EXPENSIVE NEW WARS AND GLOBAL MARKET TRUMP TURMOIL. If the immigrants hadn't kept us level, your "stagnant" economy would have plummeted like a rock. You cannot possibly be presenting that as X=Y in a total vacuum.

This kind of xenophobia doesn't need explaining, but it's worth saying why it won't work and will lose Labour a lot of votes:

  • Conservative and Reform voters do NOT change their vote to Labour ever, so this pandering is worthless. But Labour can lose votes to the Greens and LDs at a high rate. Nearly ALL the Reform votes come from former Conservatives.
  • Public concern about immigration is low and goes up and down exactly with how much the press is currently going on about it (see the graph) so is not worth alienating your voter base about
  • And it is alienating voters, because you've heard this kind of rhetoric before but it was from the actual NF and BNP
  • The Mail's headline today was still attacking Labour because it is impossible to ever go far enough for them, or for Reform voters. Nothing is ever enough.

So, Labour saying "Reform are right actually" won't bring a single voter over to Labour, but it sure will lose you a few. Or, er, a lot. People are resigning their Labour membership and sounding furious. I haven't seen a single event trigger this much outrage from the public (and Labour MPs) in quite a while. Starmer has hugely damaged himself. Germany's far-right AfD are praising him, that's the level it's at.

I already left for the Greens, but today has me going even further. I think it's now worth the potential chaos to get rid of Starmer's version of Labour. In a timely article today, Nesrine Malik called our current elections "hostage politics". You MUST vote Labour or the Tories will get in. Now you MUST vote Labour or Reform will get in.

I don't respond well to threats. Never have. I tend to escalate. And I'm bored of their crap: more cuts, keeping first-past-the-post even though Labour members want PR, refusing to talk about rejoining the EU even though Labour members (and the majority of the country) want full rejoin, this xenophobic shit which goes against everything Starmer said about immigration when he was running for leader (but then he's broken every pledge from that time), the anti-trans bollocks, coming for the disabled PIP and saying all benefits are too high and that people are taking advantage of handouts and all the rest.

Fuck these guys. There's pragmatic politics where you compromise, and then there's this literal far-right shit that means you personally HAVE to be comfortable with saying it in public. It's about the soul of the PM and the party. Today is way over the line of sensible cross-party anything.

And I'm done with hostage politics. What, so we keep Labour in for 8 more years of... this? Of the same or more cuts? I'm rapidly approaching the point where smashing this Labour party so that they never try to be centre- / far-right again would do more good than the short-term harm.

Voters didn't show unwavering support for Labour at the last election, they showed that they will be extremely flexible and vote for whoever can win in their area. If Labour become unpopular in the polls, that will be someone else and not them. Labour's lead is incredibly fragile and changeable and today's performance is EXACTLY how they lose it and deserve to lose it. Yes, some young men went to Reform before the election... and twice as many young women went to the Greens. Labour's share fell 21% in 18-24 year olds. You cannot gain a single Reform vote by going right. It will never be far-right enough.
Saying that Reform are correct and using their rhetoric in speeches and changing your policies to theirs is NOT how you defeat them, or run a country.

Replace Starmer, quickly. At the very least.

And so what is the purpose of this thread, other than to vent into an online echo-chamber? I think it's a request to a call to action. It's a call out to everyone who currently resides - whether you like it or not - in a Labour controlled constituency and has a labour MP.

You can easily find out the details, together with links to their speeches and/or voting records, from service such as They Work For You.
Check the details of your MP, and especially their stance on immigration and other matters important to you, then email them.

TheyWorkForYou: Hansard and Official Reports for the UK Parliament, Scottish Parliament, and Northern Ireland Assembly - done right

Making it easy to keep an eye on the UK’s parliaments. Discover who represents you, how they’ve voted and what they’ve said in debates.

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Ceramiq · 19/05/2025 12:18

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 19/05/2025 10:51

Yes, and the hope of finding a well paid job after that.

The well paid job is the outcome of successful cultural and academic enrichment.

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 12:23

derxa · 19/05/2025 12:03

Well I’m a wishy washy Conservative and Starmer will never get my vote. You keep saying this is because of poor ‘comms’ and right wing media. But I can hear and see his behaviour on PMQs every week. A slippery character who never answers a question. And as for his attitude towards women… Farage is a complete narcissist so not him either.

So who- Badenoch?

I doubt many people have the time and inclination to watch PMQs every week. Some, as in a sizable number probably don't even know what PMQs are and yes, they are heavily influenced by the right wing media.

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:28

Araminta1003 · 19/05/2025 12:06

I also think forget about the Red Wall voters.
The more interesting question is the young voters. And Reform are plugged into the social media somehow. And that is where Labour need to make strides.
Youth mobility is good for the young. My DC are happy about it, they are not anti immigration, they want opportunity and flexibility and they are all voting in the next election (bar the youngest).

Wow. Waves from the red wall. As long as middle class kids benefit eh.

derxa · 19/05/2025 12:28

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 12:23

So who- Badenoch?

I doubt many people have the time and inclination to watch PMQs every week. Some, as in a sizable number probably don't even know what PMQs are and yes, they are heavily influenced by the right wing media.

Even HIGNFY have turned on Sir Keir. I noticed that in the latest episode. The exchange with Liz Saville Roberts onPMQs was shown.

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:32

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:28

Wow. Waves from the red wall. As long as middle class kids benefit eh.

You don't think working class children will benefit from a youth mobility scheme and/or the Erasmus scheme?

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 12:33

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:28

Wow. Waves from the red wall. As long as middle class kids benefit eh.

Where has that poster stated, "middle class kids", they stated, "youth". Why are you sewing division, don't working class kids want freedom of movement, why do you say that?

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:33

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:32

You don't think working class children will benefit from a youth mobility scheme and/or the Erasmus scheme?

'Forget the red wall' was the posters words. Do you agree?

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 12:33

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:32

You don't think working class children will benefit from a youth mobility scheme and/or the Erasmus scheme?

Sorry, cross posted.

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:34

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:33

'Forget the red wall' was the posters words. Do you agree?

Do you agree 'the red wall' will benefit as well?

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 12:35

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:32

You don't think working class children will benefit from a youth mobility scheme and/or the Erasmus scheme?

For the majority, no I don't. Because that involves being able to find out about these schemes. Over 30% kids leave school with 0 GCSEs, mainly from deprived areas. Those aren't the kids who go on Erasmus schemes! Are you so far detached from reality??
Kids who go on Erasmus are mainly MC upwards

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:38

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 12:35

For the majority, no I don't. Because that involves being able to find out about these schemes. Over 30% kids leave school with 0 GCSEs, mainly from deprived areas. Those aren't the kids who go on Erasmus schemes! Are you so far detached from reality??
Kids who go on Erasmus are mainly MC upwards

Edited

Even if it is just a minority that will benefit from it is, it is a positive move.

Middle class children will be alright regardless

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:41

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:34

Do you agree 'the red wall' will benefit as well?

Do you answer every question with a question?

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 12:41

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:38

Even if it is just a minority that will benefit from it is, it is a positive move.

Middle class children will be alright regardless

I work with WC kids in Red Wall areas. Trust me, Erasmus isn't in their vocabulary. Apprenticeships where they earn + learn are most popular is the sought after progression route but many don't even make that

Araminta1003 · 19/05/2025 12:41

Exactly, surely working class kids supposedly “stuck” in deprived areas are even more in need of mobility and opportunity.

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:42

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 12:35

For the majority, no I don't. Because that involves being able to find out about these schemes. Over 30% kids leave school with 0 GCSEs, mainly from deprived areas. Those aren't the kids who go on Erasmus schemes! Are you so far detached from reality??
Kids who go on Erasmus are mainly MC upwards

Edited

Yep exactly. Thank you

Goldenbear · 19/05/2025 12:42

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:33

'Forget the red wall' was the posters words. Do you agree?

Red wall aside, there does need to be a focus on youth again, if you want to see the wealth inequalities reduced, young people, which includes young people from all over, need to be prioritised and invested in.

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:42

Vibes of 'stay in your lane'

Araminta1003 · 19/05/2025 12:43

You really cannot have it both ways. So supposedly working class lesser skilled kids keep coming “over” from the EU to grab opportunities here, but supposedly our own cannot do the same? Please make it make sense.

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:43

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:42

Vibes of 'stay in your lane'

From you and others, yes

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 12:43

Araminta1003 · 19/05/2025 12:41

Exactly, surely working class kids supposedly “stuck” in deprived areas are even more in need of mobility and opportunity.

They do but Erasmus won't be it. How can you do Erasmus if you don't have a passport?

Araminta1003 · 19/05/2025 12:45

I am obviously meant forget the angry middle aged and older red wall moaners who follow Reform. The key is in making sure the younger generation there are given opportunity and a future.

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:45

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:43

From you and others, yes

So no to a youth mobilty scheme or Erasmus then from you?

Yes it is another question but you haven't answered it before

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 12:46

Araminta1003 · 19/05/2025 12:43

You really cannot have it both ways. So supposedly working class lesser skilled kids keep coming “over” from the EU to grab opportunities here, but supposedly our own cannot do the same? Please make it make sense.

I never said that lesser skilled kids were coming here. I'm talking about the absolutely out of touch and entitled attitude that the Red Wall towns will benefit from Erasmus.

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:47

DuncinToffee · 19/05/2025 12:45

So no to a youth mobilty scheme or Erasmus then from you?

Yes it is another question but you haven't answered it before

And you haven't answered mine!

Forget the red wall. Do you agree?

TheNuthatch · 19/05/2025 12:48

twistyizzy · 19/05/2025 12:46

I never said that lesser skilled kids were coming here. I'm talking about the absolutely out of touch and entitled attitude that the Red Wall towns will benefit from Erasmus.

Yes. It's laughable and so out of touch. Young people who could were already going to study or work in Europe, as my dc did after Brexit.