Every one so up in arms about trump, but what about…

[admirible]

1. JFK supported by the mob who paid for him to come into power.
2. JFK Cuban missile crisis.
3. Clinton M impeachment not to mention starting strikes on irak to detract from it.
4. Clinton F did not win the seats, Bernie did, the old guard of the party let down the voters,
5. Biden senile couldn’t string a coherent sentence throughout term of office.

Probably nothing. He’s just easy to manipulate. Boris nailed it. You flatter him you get whatever you like.

No diagram but I have a photo
Ah forgot the photos don't work!

Go on then. Start a serious one.

Trying again

You’ve missed rapist and felon.

Ok, let’s have a calm reasoned discussion. You’re probably aware of the reasons why he’s not liked. What is it about him that you do support?

I asked a serious question earlier in the thread. The OP disappeared.

I think all MN care about is clicks. Money in their pockets.

How are you relating that back to this thread?

What?!

Let any old goady thread stand, Just as long as it generates clicks, You know that so why the fake 'what'?

No, it wasn't a fake 'what' - it was an 'I haven't a clue what you're on about' what.

Oh, and @Stealer if you think it's a goady thread, then report it

Saying nobody was up in arms about an incident where you acknowledge the president was impeached because of it and claiming nobody was up in arms about the invasion of Iraq are spectacularly giving thick takes

No point. The clicks are more important than the blatant goady threads. As you well know.

Why do you keep saying 'as you well know'? Are you trying to imply something?

If you mean the Russian invasion of Ukraine, then it wouldn't have happened if the savages stayed in their swamp

This..

@wholettheturnipsburn and @nomoretoriesforme

would like to articulate a bit more clearly what your point(s) is/are? A genuine question, because I don't understand where you're coming from/what you mean.

No point. Everyone is a Russian bot for you!

My point was, I thought, obvious

The poster to which I was replying was talking about Russian -Ukraine war started by other world leaders.

I was pointing out that it was actually an invasion. The savages and the swamp refers to the invaders

So start a serious thread, with a considered OP, and you are much more likely to get considered responses. Although no-one can guarantee that on MN!

50/50 at best

I suppose to be fair we (UK and Europe) are reminded quite frequently of the importance of the U.S. on the world stage and also where we are going wrong.

But not the guy who actually INVADED the place?

I think people who 'obsess' over US politics are simply aware of the direct influence of a country that represents 25 or 26% of the world economy, and which for better or worse has been such a consistently dominant power geopolitically. It will really be felt quickly over here. That's all. We should all care. Also because it will influence global culture and as a woman with daughters I care very much about them not having to contend with the ferocious return of a nasty patriarchy.