Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

So much for the Trump Bounce

178 replies

dubsie · 07/02/2025 21:11

All is promises at the before the election...now he says he can't promise anything. Stock market has nose dived and NATO are sending troops to Greenland because of his threats, the people of Gaza are being told to leave to go no one knows because Trump was it as a holiday destination.

He's pulled out of the climate treaty, the world health organisation and now imposed sanctions on the ICC.

I dispair and despise the Americans who voted this man in because we now have to deal with the consequences of the fallout of that man.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Eraclea · 09/02/2025 09:32

Aintnobodygottime · 08/02/2025 10:30

Transparency is being eroded as power is being given to unelected billionaires. How can anyone see Trumps actions as increasing transparency?

Have to assume that they’re impressed by the very fact he says the (previously thought to be) unsayable and, not analysing further, assume he’s ‘telling it like it is’ and therefore admirable.

Comments in favour of Trump always comes down on the side of being impressed by his bombast. “At least he’s getting stuff done, unlike our lot.” Yes, easy to get stuff done - or sound like you are - when you have no regard for the consequences and or little things like the rule of law.

Greenkindness · 09/02/2025 09:32

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:22

You can think that all you want, but they are also the countries that will say no.

And meanwhile here in the UK, we’re trying to save the world. A tiny island by comparison, trying to steamroll towards Net Zero at any expense, knowing it won’t impact outcomes AND! taking in millions of migrants every year.

That’s why America is going to prosper and we are not.

Yes no one takes accountability for their actions it seems

Porcuporpoise · 09/02/2025 09:32

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 07:36

You really think we are all going to die if we don’t cut carbon by 2030? And make us all poor by taxing the shit out of us and jizzing all the tax revenue on windmills?

I’m not sure I can take such hyperbole seriously

Not all and probably not you if you live in the west but a whole bunch of people are already at risk and the dying has already started.

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:37

“I love you. Get out – you gotta get out and vote. In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.”

This was said during the campaign in 2020. It’s was highlighting the importance of the people’s vote. The fact they had to get out and vote just one time and that’s would be it for four years. That after that he’d have America is such a good place (you remember it was Covid at the time) they’d fix that problem. And that would be it. The Republicans would be popular for good.
He was appealing to people to vote that one time who might not normally vote - that’s how important their vote was for that 2020 election.

He has never ever implied that he would get rid of elections or people’s right to vote and we are yet to see plans for that. I don’t think we will and I doubt The Guardian really does either.

MemorableTrenchcoat · 09/02/2025 09:37

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 09:23

I object to your anti Christian stance

Why do you feel it is acceptable to be so disparaging to Christians?

Aw, diddums. I object to people thinking that a religion should have any bearing on how a country is governed.

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 09:40

MemorableTrenchcoat · 09/02/2025 09:37

Aw, diddums. I object to people thinking that a religion should have any bearing on how a country is governed.

It’s interesting though that you feel it’s completely fine to disparage Christianity

Yet, you are probably on the prescribed bandwagon to be outraged of any criticism of Islam

Why is that?

MemorableTrenchcoat · 09/02/2025 09:44

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 09:40

It’s interesting though that you feel it’s completely fine to disparage Christianity

Yet, you are probably on the prescribed bandwagon to be outraged of any criticism of Islam

Why is that?

Wrong. Like any religion, both are a load of rubbish, based on daft ideas a few people espoused many centuries ago. Believe whatever you like about an omnipresent sky daddy, but don’t think for a moment that he should get to decide about abortions or homosexuality or anything else.

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:44

Greenkindness · 09/02/2025 09:32

Yes no one takes accountability for their actions it seems

Right. And we can’t solve the world’s problems.

Also, we are no longer an influence. We look foolish and weak.

We are in a fortunate position to live in the West, but an unfortunate position of living in the UK, where we will soon be living like the third world. Whilst the rest of the world thrives and prospers.

And in 2030, nothing will have happened.

I expect we’ll be told by the mad people in charge of a revised date or a revised environmental issue, to terrify us into giving them more money though.

Hobbesmanc · 09/02/2025 09:46

@hamstersarse I'm not anti Christian. I dentist as Christian myself. But there is a type of Christian nationalism allied with an aggressive conservative ideology that's fanatically anti women's choice, anti LGBT, anti civil rights. It's not Christian values as I understand them.

Hobbesmanc · 09/02/2025 09:49

@Needmilkandbread I'm aware of the difference between civil and criminal law hence why I agreed. He's not a convicted sex offender. Just one with a lot of allegations

But he was convicted of 34 felonies. Regardless of how you choose to minimise that. He's not fit for that office and shameless apologists on here who also distort and misrepresent the truth deserve him

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 09:52

Hobbesmanc · 09/02/2025 09:49

@Needmilkandbread I'm aware of the difference between civil and criminal law hence why I agreed. He's not a convicted sex offender. Just one with a lot of allegations

But he was convicted of 34 felonies. Regardless of how you choose to minimise that. He's not fit for that office and shameless apologists on here who also distort and misrepresent the truth deserve him

Well you did describe him as a convicted sex offender? So if you knew that, why did you call him it?

Also the 34 felon charges were for 34 payments to Stormy Daniels, and like you probably also know, is really all the same thing, but the sound bite of 34 is much more damaging

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 09:53

Hobbesmanc · 09/02/2025 09:46

@hamstersarse I'm not anti Christian. I dentist as Christian myself. But there is a type of Christian nationalism allied with an aggressive conservative ideology that's fanatically anti women's choice, anti LGBT, anti civil rights. It's not Christian values as I understand them.

Do you hold the same disdain for the entirety of Islam who are literally against LGBTQ and women’s rights?

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:54

Hobbesmanc · 09/02/2025 09:49

@Needmilkandbread I'm aware of the difference between civil and criminal law hence why I agreed. He's not a convicted sex offender. Just one with a lot of allegations

But he was convicted of 34 felonies. Regardless of how you choose to minimise that. He's not fit for that office and shameless apologists on here who also distort and misrepresent the truth deserve him

When a penalty is financial, as it often is in a civil court, there is often scepticism and civil convictions are unlikely to impact people’s views in the same way a criminal conviction would.

Regardless, the ability to run a country is not tied to the outcomes of the civil case. Regardless of whether you believe he is morally fit to be president, he is doing what he has been voted in to do and America will prosper much more than it did under the previous administration. That may in the American’s eyes, make him perfectly fit to be president.

Greenkindness · 09/02/2025 09:55

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:44

Right. And we can’t solve the world’s problems.

Also, we are no longer an influence. We look foolish and weak.

We are in a fortunate position to live in the West, but an unfortunate position of living in the UK, where we will soon be living like the third world. Whilst the rest of the world thrives and prospers.

And in 2030, nothing will have happened.

I expect we’ll be told by the mad people in charge of a revised date or a revised environmental issue, to terrify us into giving them more money though.

Yes it’s a shame we left the EU really. It’s good to be in a bloc against other superpowers.

Climate change is happening and it’s going to affect us and our children.

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:57

Greenkindness · 09/02/2025 09:55

Yes it’s a shame we left the EU really. It’s good to be in a bloc against other superpowers.

Climate change is happening and it’s going to affect us and our children.

I am so glad not to be in the EU. One look at Germany, and I know I made the right decision when I voted to leave.

Climate change is always happening and is not important. I would like more focus placed on litter control and waste in our rivers. This country is disgusting.

Sadcafe · 09/02/2025 09:59

dubsie · 08/02/2025 08:39

You are a fool then, sacking millions of government workers is not glorious and hand the savings to a tiny minority of wealthy individuals is hardly something I'd be proud of.

This is the end of America as a democratic nation....Trump won't concede if he loses next time....he's a Hungarian dictator in the making

He can’t stand again unless he tries to change the law and that one’s probably past even his ego, the real danger probably lies in the likes of Musk standing at the next election

GutsyShark · 09/02/2025 10:00

This is his second term. It’s not as if people didn’t know what they were voting for. They knew exactly what he was like and that’s what they wanted. And his supporters will be delighted with what he has done so far.

GrammarTeacher · 09/02/2025 10:07

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 09:23

I object to your anti Christian stance

Why do you feel it is acceptable to be so disparaging to Christians?

Possibly because anyone who followed the actual teaching of Jesus would NOT support Trump’s presidency.

GrammarTeacher · 09/02/2025 10:09

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:57

I am so glad not to be in the EU. One look at Germany, and I know I made the right decision when I voted to leave.

Climate change is always happening and is not important. I would like more focus placed on litter control and waste in our rivers. This country is disgusting.

Litter and waste in our rivers is all part of the same environmental issue. We need to care about the environment.

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 10:15

GrammarTeacher · 09/02/2025 10:07

Possibly because anyone who followed the actual teaching of Jesus would NOT support Trump’s presidency.

That wasn’t the objection, it was that ‘fundamental right Christian’s’ support him

It was anti Christian rhetoric

Convolvulus · 09/02/2025 10:17

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:22

You can think that all you want, but they are also the countries that will say no.

And meanwhile here in the UK, we’re trying to save the world. A tiny island by comparison, trying to steamroll towards Net Zero at any expense, knowing it won’t impact outcomes AND! taking in millions of migrants every year.

That’s why America is going to prosper and we are not.

We're actually taking in fewer migrants than most other countries in Europe. Don't let the facts get in the way, will you?

BIossomtoes · 09/02/2025 10:29

hamstersarse · 09/02/2025 10:15

That wasn’t the objection, it was that ‘fundamental right Christian’s’ support him

It was anti Christian rhetoric

It was fact.

Convolvulus · 09/02/2025 10:31

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:37

“I love you. Get out – you gotta get out and vote. In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.”

This was said during the campaign in 2020. It’s was highlighting the importance of the people’s vote. The fact they had to get out and vote just one time and that’s would be it for four years. That after that he’d have America is such a good place (you remember it was Covid at the time) they’d fix that problem. And that would be it. The Republicans would be popular for good.
He was appealing to people to vote that one time who might not normally vote - that’s how important their vote was for that 2020 election.

He has never ever implied that he would get rid of elections or people’s right to vote and we are yet to see plans for that. I don’t think we will and I doubt The Guardian really does either.

Yet he keeps bringing the subject up. Only a few days ago, in Washington, he said "“I want to be here with you, and I have to be here with you, and I do that despite the fact that they say I can't run again". In Las Vegas, he said “It will be the greatest honour of my life to serve not once but twice – or three or four times.” When it was suggested that the law would prevent him serving a third term, his response was a sarcastic "Oooooh". And a Republican representative has filed for an amendment to the constitution to allow it.

EasternStandard · 09/02/2025 10:31

GutsyShark · 09/02/2025 10:00

This is his second term. It’s not as if people didn’t know what they were voting for. They knew exactly what he was like and that’s what they wanted. And his supporters will be delighted with what he has done so far.

Despite mn, they probably are.

BIossomtoes · 09/02/2025 10:34

Needmilkandbread · 09/02/2025 09:37

“I love you. Get out – you gotta get out and vote. In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.”

This was said during the campaign in 2020. It’s was highlighting the importance of the people’s vote. The fact they had to get out and vote just one time and that’s would be it for four years. That after that he’d have America is such a good place (you remember it was Covid at the time) they’d fix that problem. And that would be it. The Republicans would be popular for good.
He was appealing to people to vote that one time who might not normally vote - that’s how important their vote was for that 2020 election.

He has never ever implied that he would get rid of elections or people’s right to vote and we are yet to see plans for that. I don’t think we will and I doubt The Guardian really does either.

He said it in July last year. 🤷‍♀️