Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Is Angela Raynor a liar or is it all anti Labour media bias?

1000 replies

CormorantStrikesBack · 10/03/2024 12:33

I’m well aware how anti Labour a lot of the main stream media seem to be so I wasn’t paying much attention previously to all the stuff about how she should have paid capital gains tax on her house, etc. she was adamant that she didn’t need to.

So it seems like she said it was her main residence so not liable for capital gains tax. But her husband and kids lived in a house a short distance away apparently for the first five years of their marriage which is unusual. A neighbour who lived next to her “husband’s” house said it was the main family home and Angela definitely lived there.

I’ll be sad if she has lied. Always thought she was on the side of the ordinary person. I guess the police/tax man might have a hard time proving anything though regardless of the neighbour’s statement. If all bills, etc were in the individual names there’s no evidence.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Alexandra2001 · 15/04/2024 08:06

user411966691966 · 15/04/2024 07:54

It is not anti Labour bias. It is calling out AR on her actions. Just the same as the media called out Boris Johnson on his actions.

MN had long running threads with about 8 regular people filling up 40-odd pages of anti Boris, anti Tory comments before moving on to fill up another.

The comments even spilled onto other threads with one regular ex-MNer (since banned or institutionalised) who used to harangue posters and follow them over asking about BJ and cake.

When the heat falls on a Labour politician, you have to expect some questions.

Well, we don't know about AR's actions.

We've a series of unsubstantiated allegations, which is very similar to "Beergate" again, investigated by the Police, with no further action taken.

The Tories also have their own anti Starmer poster on here, who constantly bangs on about Starmer/curries/beer and how many were present, never lets it lie....& across any political or gender thread..... no ridicule from you on this person is there?

We are asking questions of AR, she is being investigated and she has said she'll stand down if guilty, which, for me (and other Labour supporting posters on here) extends to the tax question too.

So, what more do you want???

Since when has a Tory minister said he/she will resign if guilty.... its all very one sided and thats the evidence of the bias shown towards Labour.

CurlewKate · 15/04/2024 08:07

@Idontknowwhattodo78 Also, Rayner was definitely separated if not divorced from her husband when she was in a relationship with Sam Tarry. He was also separated.

eveoha · 15/04/2024 08:42

I care not a jot what fiscal or moral rules/laws Angela Rayner has transgressed - However the fact that she bought a council house under the Tory / Thatcher ‘right to buy’ scheme (at a hefty discount) and then sold it on proves how morally bankrupt she is - By doing this individuals brought about this horrendous housing crisis by forcing people to rent from private landlords

Zonder · 15/04/2024 08:43

The comments even spilled onto other threads with one regular ex-MNer (since banned or institutionalised) who used to harangue posters and follow them over asking about BJ and cake.

To be fair it was a reasonable question, serving to remind people that Johnson was guilty but didn't take any consequences. Which frankly is my main issue with the wrongdoings of the Tory politicians in the forefront today.

Zonder · 15/04/2024 08:45

@eveoha that brings us back to only certain type of people being allowed to own houses. That's immoral.

I'm a socialist and yet I own my own house. RTB was to enable as many people to be able to own their home. Absolutely nothing wrong with that - the issue was that the money wasn't ploughed back into funding more affordable homes.

As a socialist I believe everyone should be able to afford their own home - a living wage should theoretically make that possible.

Some people on here seem to think that socialist means being poor and on benefits or something.

eveoha · 15/04/2024 09:00

Zonder - Of course there’s something wrong with buying social housing stock which was built purposefully to provide people who didn't have the wherewithal to buy a property I can see how your muddled thinking came about - you obviously fell for the Thatcherite spiel and as did Ms Rayner, you jumped on the Anti socialist bandwagon - the effect of which are sadly writ large in and visible in the awful state of the country and society today And for that I cannot forgive you or Angela Rayner and the hosts of others for profiteering re social housing

DuncinToffee · 15/04/2024 09:06

Quite the vitriol in some of the latest posts Confused

Zonder · 15/04/2024 09:17

eveoha · 15/04/2024 09:00

Zonder - Of course there’s something wrong with buying social housing stock which was built purposefully to provide people who didn't have the wherewithal to buy a property I can see how your muddled thinking came about - you obviously fell for the Thatcherite spiel and as did Ms Rayner, you jumped on the Anti socialist bandwagon - the effect of which are sadly writ large in and visible in the awful state of the country and society today And for that I cannot forgive you or Angela Rayner and the hosts of others for profiteering re social housing

Don't be so bloody ridiculous and patronising. If housing stock built for people without the means to buy a property can be sold to them at a reasonable rate to help them get on the property ladder (like all those wealthier people who earn more than a living wage) then that's a good thing. Or do you think they should know their place and doff the cap to their landlords?

I'll just explain it again simply. The money from selling the houses should have gone into building more houses that people not yet able to get on the property ladder can rent affordably. It didn't. That was Thatcher's huge mistake.

I don't suppose AR cares any more than I do about being forgiven by you 🤣

Alexandra2001 · 15/04/2024 09:22

eveoha · 15/04/2024 09:00

Zonder - Of course there’s something wrong with buying social housing stock which was built purposefully to provide people who didn't have the wherewithal to buy a property I can see how your muddled thinking came about - you obviously fell for the Thatcherite spiel and as did Ms Rayner, you jumped on the Anti socialist bandwagon - the effect of which are sadly writ large in and visible in the awful state of the country and society today And for that I cannot forgive you or Angela Rayner and the hosts of others for profiteering re social housing

I do really like the desperation of some very obvious Tory supporters who come on here pretending they are hardcore socialists......

IClaudine · 15/04/2024 09:27

Less well off people should only ever be allowed to rent from their betters.

I didn't agree with right to buy, but I don't blame anyone who decided to go for it.

As pp said, the problem was not those buying their homes, but the policy of not allowing the money raised to be ploughed back into building more houses. Thatcher wanted us to become a nation of homeowners. Didn't quite go to plan, eh?

eveoha · 15/04/2024 09:45

Zonder no real logic in your response - and am concerned re extrapolations and assumption re my politics - i have never voted anything but Labour - despite the many party members / MPs deviating from the original tenets . Let’s not lose sight of the fact that not everyone fits any iprofile necessary to be accepted for a building society mortgage - (my husband and I i are now in that position) hence the necessity for social housing and not extortionate private rentals with ever increasing service charges. I’m so glad you don’t care re any element of forgiveness for capitalism and solipsism - as it is evidence that Karl Marx was correct in his assertions

IClaudine · 15/04/2024 09:45

user411966691966 · 15/04/2024 07:54

It is not anti Labour bias. It is calling out AR on her actions. Just the same as the media called out Boris Johnson on his actions.

MN had long running threads with about 8 regular people filling up 40-odd pages of anti Boris, anti Tory comments before moving on to fill up another.

The comments even spilled onto other threads with one regular ex-MNer (since banned or institutionalised) who used to harangue posters and follow them over asking about BJ and cake.

When the heat falls on a Labour politician, you have to expect some questions.

Johnson and the rest have behaved so badly and fucked up running the UK so spectacularly that there was much to discuss on those threads. No wonder they filled up so fast.

Btw, why did Johnson think he was allowed cake and a birthday party when children weren't? That question has never fully been answered.

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 15/04/2024 09:48

IClaudine · 15/04/2024 09:45

Johnson and the rest have behaved so badly and fucked up running the UK so spectacularly that there was much to discuss on those threads. No wonder they filled up so fast.

Btw, why did Johnson think he was allowed cake and a birthday party when children weren't? That question has never fully been answered.

NO WHATABOUTERY!

(That’s the ‘approved’ position isn’t it?)

IClaudine · 15/04/2024 09:51

eveoha stop personally attacking Zonder. MN frowns on it.

IClaudine · 15/04/2024 09:53

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 15/04/2024 09:48

NO WHATABOUTERY!

(That’s the ‘approved’ position isn’t it?)

The poster I was replying to mentioned the long running Johnson and Tory threads and cake. No whataboutery.

eveoha · 15/04/2024 10:25

Will do IClaudine 👍 but must proffer congrats to Zonder on derailing post on Angela Rayner’s lack of moral /political compass - Let’s hope she hasn’t got any shares in private medicine or Academy school 🤨

Alexandra2001 · 15/04/2024 11:37

eveoha · 15/04/2024 09:45

Zonder no real logic in your response - and am concerned re extrapolations and assumption re my politics - i have never voted anything but Labour - despite the many party members / MPs deviating from the original tenets . Let’s not lose sight of the fact that not everyone fits any iprofile necessary to be accepted for a building society mortgage - (my husband and I i are now in that position) hence the necessity for social housing and not extortionate private rentals with ever increasing service charges. I’m so glad you don’t care re any element of forgiveness for capitalism and solipsism - as it is evidence that Karl Marx was correct in his assertions

You can have RTB and still have sufficient council housing, the two are not mutually exclusive.

RTB raised the standards in many council house estate, some people tend to look after their own properties a little better than someone else's.

I'd question why anyone who claims to be a labour supporter would attack Rayner over un proven allegations, especially as she will resign if guilty.

Do you really want another 5 years of the Tories?

The only poll that matters is the one at the next GE and genuine supporters shouldn't lose sight of that.

user411966691966 · 15/04/2024 12:36

The Tories also have their own anti Starmer poster on here, who constantly bangs on about Starmer/curries/beer and how many were present, never lets it lie....& across any political or gender thread..... no ridicule from you on this person is there?

@Alexandra2001 perhaps you reap what you sow

eveoha · 15/04/2024 12:45

I am not ‘attacking’ Rayner I am merely stating that what I find reprehensible is her purchase of a LA property through Thatcher’s ‘right to buy’ scheme - which to me says a lot about her character and politics - any issue re lying about any potential tax liability is subordinate tbh - And good to see the upside of ‘right to buy’ being pointed out ie it raises ‘standards in many council estates’ - maintenance of council properties is the responsibility of councils - it’s what rent is meant to cover.

eveoha · 15/04/2024 12:49

just seen another MN thread re Angela Rayner’s council house purchase and her hypocracy - looks like a few people ckncur with me 👍☘️

bombastix · 15/04/2024 12:56

Well we will find out or we will find out that the neighbours had their own motivations. For whatever reason Rayner seems to really annoy a certain sort of Tory bloke. I find it a bit depressing the energy they have in belittling her, whether she's done wrong or not.

A man would not get this treatment - it is personal to her

DuncinToffee · 15/04/2024 13:04

https://x.com/BestForBritain/status/1779841178965364906

Tory MP James Daly refuses to say what offence he thinks Angela Rayner has committed.

When HE was the one that made a complaint to the police after they initially decided not to investigate.

DuncinToffee · 15/04/2024 13:05

eveoha · 15/04/2024 12:49

just seen another MN thread re Angela Rayner’s council house purchase and her hypocracy - looks like a few people ckncur with me 👍☘️

Are you saying that Angela Rayner should have continued to rent?

IClaudine · 15/04/2024 13:09

eveoha · 15/04/2024 12:49

just seen another MN thread re Angela Rayner’s council house purchase and her hypocracy - looks like a few people ckncur with me 👍☘️

Link to thread pretty please?

IClaudine · 15/04/2024 13:10

DuncinToffee · 15/04/2024 13:05

Are you saying that Angela Rayner should have continued to rent?

Elvira Mistress Of The Dark Halloween GIF by filmeditor

She should have had the foresight to know she would become deputy PM in waiting and have acted accordingly.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.