Demonstrably rigged since the wikileaks exposes.
Don't get me wrong I'm not saying it was in much doubt in most people's minds that Wall street had influence but actually choosing Obama's cabinet? Jeez...
So how do they rig it?
www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/55311
" I know how the game is played and I know
how the fix was in, because I helped fix games under some of the best such as Tip
and Jim Wright."
Well the Democrats have something called super delegates. Win a state caucus and you take their delegates with you to the convention and they vote for you. All that is except the superdelegates ( about 20% of the total) who 'choose' themselves. So they just had to rig the super delegates.
Even so he did too well and was still threatening to beat her so they 'leveraged' him.
As for the election itself they first instruct the media to pied piper the Republican candidates. Force them into extreme positions as explained here..
t.co/DAmWNq9K0f
In other words they have to box themselves into an extreme position merely to get the nomination. Then the media really flexes it's muscles.
Leaking debate questions to the Democrats, supposedly neutral journalists acting like Democrat employees and actually asking for orders from them never mind being given them. Other than Fox, which was very lukewarm on Trump, the Democrats basically own the entire shebang. They talk with one voice to reinforce whatever line the Democrats want.
Then of course there's money. What with the shananigans over South Par and the banks having only to give a teensy weensy fraction of the money they were given in bailouts the Democrats budget was practically unlimited. Saudi Arabia is reckoned to have donated $400m alone, as it did for Obama though Qatar of course can barely find enough politicians to buy. Prices have gone up as a lot of their bought and paid fors have a remarkably short career.
So, I suppose I could just have answered everything is rigged but suspected you wanted details.