It's so refreshing to see this thread. And the frank and transparent honesty on it. I get so tired of seeing the threads where someone asks 'AIBU to have a baby at 44?' and loads of people come on and say 'yes do it! Best thing ever!' Fact is it's not. It's bloody hard work.
A fairly healthy and fit 43 year old who feels ready and able to take on a baby, needs to take into account the fact that the child will still be at school when she is SIXTY! And whilst you feel OK in your early 40s, don't forget menopause is a bitch, and will knock the stuffing out of you! And whether people like it or not, many people will see their health start to decline at around 50.
Then there's the fact that your child has a higher chance of becoming an orphan young if you have them at 43-44+. And please don't come out with the 'but you could have them at 19 and die at 30' old chestnut, because if you have a baby at 43-44, your child is WAY more likely to be an orphan at a young age than if you have them at 19!
I understand that some people don't meet 'the one' until 40-42 or so, but people should still think very seriously before having a baby in their mid 40s. AND, like some others, I can't understand why anyone would choose to have more kids when their youngest is 15-16 or more (like some people do!!!)
As a few posters have said, it's basically 40 years of parenting! I had my 2 in my late 20s - one year apart - and I adore them, (they're now in their mid 20s, and left home when they went to uni.) I loved every minute of raising them, but I couldn't have imagined having another baby at 43-44 or so when they were in their mid to late teens. The new baby would have still been at school when me and DH were in our 60s! Eeeeek, no thanks! 😬