Why is it that people who think animals are little more than props so intent on acquiring them?
Not 'props' but animal companions and/or playthings. And that doesn't mean you need to keep them forever.
Look at how many posters in this thread alone expressed a desire to get rid of the husband. A living human being with emotions and feelings, who might be devastated by such actions.
Yet animals don't have feelings and complex emotions. A cat literally doesn't care whether you rehome it. Give it less than a week where the new owner dotes on it and feeds it, and pt would become just as attached to them. They have no trauma from being rwhomed nor feelings of rejection.
Look some PPs have said how terrible it is to get rid of a pet for whatever reason, but just because they say it doesn't make it true. Give me one reason, logical, moral, ethical whatever, why someone shouldn't pass along a pet even just when they become bored. With the caveat that they're rehoming it to a loving and caring owner.
And don't just say it's bad because I say it's bad or alternatively resort to calling me names. I mean you can do that if you want, but that would just demonstrate the emptiness of your argument.
What I'm saying is very simple and straightforward. Pets don't have complex emotions and you can't hurt their feelings. The only thing that matters for them is their physical wellbeing, so of you can assure their physical needs will be taken care of, go ahead and rehome.