Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Modelling for Babies

1399 replies

Donna247 · 01/11/2001 20:28

does anyone know any models adacey for babys modeling?
or any websites for it?

OP posts:
girl · 08/03/2005 20:23

i suppose its luck really you could go with a good agency but you still never know if they are going to get work

CARMY · 09/03/2005 10:58

BigLips First just e-mail a picture ([email protected]) to them and then if they like it they will offer you a photographic sitting. They dont charge to be on there books but do charge £99 + VAT to appear in there publications.

CARMY · 09/03/2005 13:13

Biglips First you send a photo via e-mail to [email protected] then if accepted to the agency they invite you for a photographic sitting where they take piccys and you pay £99+Vat to appear in their publications forwarded to their clients. You also get 3x 6x9 photos to keep.

catoe · 09/03/2005 14:37

Just had to say, that I have had so many emails and letters off Models Direct re: my son joining their agency. After reading everything on this web site i decided against it and have just emailed them to say id heard too much negative feedback from other mums. their response was this incase anyones interested:
"Hi Emma,

Thank you for letting me know. We are a fast growing, reputable nationwide and international agency, established since 1990. Whatever negative feedback we receive we will take on board and attempt to rectify, however to my knowledge, we have no reason to be concerned! We are very successful, and certainly would not pursue you or Archie unless we felt he was likely to be selected for work.

Either way, you have my contact details; thank you for your time up til now and you know where we are if you ever wish to re-apply.
"

They certainly like to try! Wonder if anyone has had a good experience with them! Not that Ill be going with them!

genbee · 09/03/2005 17:44

hi catoe models direct told me that my daughter would have loads of work but after i payed my money ive never heard any thing. we have sent a application form off to buzzykidz so hopefully they will take her on we live in suffolk does anyone know if they take kids on from far away

biglips · 09/03/2005 21:00

Carmy - have you had any work yet from Eurokids?

CARMY · 10/03/2005 13:15

Biglips No as i have not decided yet who to enrol with either eurokids or kidz ltd. Euro kids seems favourite at the moment(Joshua peacock from coronation street is from there agency). Have not got much info about kidz ltd yet.

catoe · 11/03/2005 07:50

I went to Kidz last week. They were on the TV the other week and when I was there, a little boy came to have his photos updated and he had appeared on Hollyoaks a few times. I was the same. Not sure if Kidz of Eurokidz were the right ones. Went with Kidz initially as they had a photo session on a saterday!

MaidoftheRiver · 24/03/2005 22:42

Way back down the thread someone asked for the details for Urban Angels, just wanted to let you they have a new website up and running which is pretty fantastic, would do a link but don't know how but the site is www.urbanangelsagency.com Worth a look for anyone who is intersted. My kids are on their books and all dealings with them have been positive. xx

florenceflying · 28/03/2005 22:05

I joined bizzy kids in October.
They took the money and never contact me.
I complained they accused me to be rude and treathen me with telling me not to say anything or they will take me to court. I only asked them to tell me the name of the jobs they put my daughter forward for.
They answered they cannot tell me.
I am telling all the mums on mumsnet beware of what you say they read your messages I have the prove and it is on writing.
I also think some of the mums that put the messages are not reallymums but people working for them.

MUM007 · 29/03/2005 11:09

FLORENCE FLYING: What mums be reminded of is that it is not the agency that picks the children for jobs but the clients.This is a very hard business and there are so many agencies out there that are also putting the children on their books forward to probably the same clients.If you are getting your child into this business you must be very realistic and treat any casting or job as a bonus in view of the competition.I have spoken to Bizzykidz at length and as usual they are very realistic about the business they are in. To be honest I dont really think they would have the time to sit posting fake messages on this website. If you look on their website you can see all the jobs their children have had and they would not be legally allowed to display nonexistent work.It is a shame that one person (just because they have had no work) can put a doubt into other parents minds regarding the agency.If you look further down you can see lots of people who have had work. Sometimes i think its the mums that want the work more than the children. P.S I do not work for the agency in any respective my D is on their books.

BOOKER · 29/03/2005 17:52

florenceflying.... I do work for Bizzykidz and would like to know exactly what you mean by you 'have prove' and 'it is on writing'. The company director is Debi Clark and would appreciate your contacting her if you have any grievances that you wish to air. No agency would ever threaten to take a parent to court and to suggest so is utterly ridiculous. If a parent was to make slanderous remarks then that would of course be different, but there would be no threat as it would merely be handed over to the company solicitors to deal with.

In response to you asking what your child has been submitted for, no agency keeps records of that, so that is most likely why you were told that. Bizzykidz receive many queries EVERY day for children. I have today submitted 9 children just for one job for the Science Museum and the client may not select any of those that I have submitted.I hope that they will, of course, but cannot affect any decision the client decides to go with, nor do they tell us why, if they decide not to select any of our suggestions. We have today dealt with 8 different assignments in this manner, so it would be ridiculous for any parent to expect us to keep record of all that we have submitted their child for, when indeed, we could have anything up to 200 children a week out to clients and all waiting for a decision. Once we have submitted a selection of children, we simply move on to the next client query and deal with that, with the previous one being filed with a date for the proposed shoot being written on the top of it. Once the shoot date has passed, should none of those submitted be chosen, then the file is shredded as it would be of no use to us if one of our children has not been assigned to it. How could we therefore tell you what your child has been submitted for if they had not be chosen?

Bizzykidz do not charge a representation fee, unlike other agencies and the fee that is charged is for set up costs only. That fee is still lower than all other agencies YEARLY fees and representation is then free until the child reaches 17.

I suggest that in future, if anyone has any queries about Bizzykidz, or indeed any other agency, please have the courtesy to call that agency in person and not air unfounded remarks on website chatrooms such as this. Any reputable agency would welcome a concerned parents call and most certainly prefer that have postings such as this be brought to their attention, when they are working extremely hard at their business, such as we are.

For the record also, no-one from this agency has, to my knowledge, ever replied to any postings on this, or any other chatroom, whilst claiming to be a member of the public. As one mum has already said, we are far too busy with work for our children to be doing that. I have replied to this email as I received 8 calls over the weekend from parents that are with our agency and were worried about our reputation; one of which is currently appearing in the Bold 2 In 1 commercial and has had 10 assignments through our agency since January this year. The father was going to reply to the postings with his experiences, but was concerned that people would accuse him of working for BIZZYKIDZ!!

I have over 10 years experience in this industry adn would be pleased to offer any information, or advice that any parent may have that is work related (what to expect at an audition - how often do children get paid etc). In future if anyone wants to talk about our agency in general PLEASE DO SO TO THE AGENCY AND NOT TO A COMPUTER! !!

MaidoftheRiver · 29/03/2005 18:11

Hi Booker, with all due respect whilst I can understand your point and your need to put a few points straight, I do not understand your problem with mums discussing agencies on line. There are many parents out there considering going down this route, and as you will see from this thread, many mums have spoke supportively and constructively about modelling agencies PARTICULARLY BizzyKids. If Bizzykidz are a busy agency then what does it really matter if a couple of people air concerns on line. People will talk whether it be in real life or on the internet, if you are a good agency, then why the problem?? Surely it doesn't affect you that much??The point of places such as mumsnet is so mums can talk and share advice on all manner of subjects, so whether you like it or not,modelling will always be a subject matter. Sorry you have felt the need to reply so strongly when so many comments on here are positive about your agency.

MUM007 · 29/03/2005 21:22

Good on Bizzykidz for being bothered to take the time to reply.There is a big difference between discussing and comparing agencies to making slanderous comments about them.If it was my agency then I would definitely want the right to reply.This just goes to show further what a respectful agency they are.

florenceflying · 29/03/2005 21:43

This is a message for mum 007
Could you tell me who are you and are you able to proove your children had work as I am sure you are working for them.
As you are not I will apologiase but if you refuse them something is smelling fishy here.
You have not seen my son so you cannot judge.
I had two other agencies asking after him.
One was bruce and brown and one is elisabeth smith.
I just do not want to risk the same thing happening again(money taken and no jobs)

florenceflying · 29/03/2005 21:52

This supposed to be a mums only internet site where we can discuss problem in peace how someone working for bizzykids got on and post a reply is worring as it means that what I was saying was true.
Yjat is the written proove that you are reading and I also believe some of the people that say so highly about this agency are not mums at all.
I am only saying what happen to me.
My son is not the best looking but I have seen pictures of some children that look worse in picture.

MaidoftheRiver · 29/03/2005 22:17

Mum007, whilst I can see why an agency wants to put things right, I don't actually see what is to be achieved by coming on here and taking the moral high ground over discussions which have been made in a 'safe' environment. People make detremntal comments all day on mumsnet about various things, pushchairs to quote one recent example. But we don't see the manufacturers getting their knickers in a twist, coming on here and feeling the need to not only defend themselves but have a go at mums who moan about agencies. Yes Florenceflyings comments were perhaps a little forthright, but so have many comments been about other agencies. Why should she not be able to speak of her experiences like everyone else? People WILL have different experiences of different agencies and therefore are entitled to different opinions.

JBMUM · 30/03/2005 02:18

Maidoftheriver has obviously not read the posting from the iliterate florence flying, to have responded with her reply. If I owned Bizzykidz, then I would want to reply on here! Good on whoever took the time to reply and if I were them I would take the silly woman to court. Her English is clearly as poor as her knowledge of British Law. To say you have proof of something (or prove in her words!) and also accuse someone of something in this manner, is slanderous to an extent and if Bizzykidz read this posting, my advice would be to get your solicitors to obtain the contact details of the woman and take her to court.

JBMUM · 30/03/2005 02:26

Oh and you cannot seriously expect someone to disclose their personal details in a chatroom can you? Asking someone to prove they have had work and tell you who they are, or 'something smelling fishy' is pathetic. If that was your approach when you contacted bizzykidz, then if they were rude to you, (which I sincerely doubt) then who can blame them!!!! Why don't you put your efforts into something more constructive...like....saving the mushroom!!

florenceflying · 30/03/2005 12:24

You are right my english is not as good as yours.
But if you have read my postings you can see that the fact that they are answering my posts prove that they are actually intruding in something private.
THIS IS A MUMS NETmade by mums for mums.
Here we can talk freerly.
If they take me to court I will take them to court for intruding in a private conversation.(this is law too)
As far as identity mum007 can keep her identity
ptrivate as far as yo are concern but they suppose to get mine how did you work that out.
I have never picked mushrooms but maybe you could show me how to do it as you know it so well.
Do not get annoyed you asked for it.

florenceflying · 30/03/2005 12:27

You are right my english is not as good as yours.
But if you have read my postings you can see that the fact that they are answering my posts prove that they are actually intruding in something private.
THIS IS A MUMS NETmade by mums for mums.
Here we can talk freerly.
If they take me to court I will take them to court for intruding in a private conversation.(this is law too)
As far as identity mum007 can keep her identity
private as far as you are concerned but they suppose to get mine how did you work that out.
I have never picked mushrooms but maybe you could show me how to do it as you know it so well.
Do not get annoyed you asked for it.

snafu · 30/03/2005 13:10

I've been reading this thread for the last couple of days and it's been making me pmsl. But I do feel compelled to make a teeny-weeny point.

This is not a private conversation you are having here, florence. In the eyes of the law, there is absolutely nothing private about anything said on Mumsnet. This is just about the most public conversation it is possible to have. You are on a public internet forum. Anyone can read it and anyone can join in.

The fact that Mumsnet is 'by parents for parents' means, ummm, bugger all. Just thought someone should put you straight

NomDePlume · 30/03/2005 13:13

The kids modelling threads always get my blood up anyway. Aside from my opinion of child-modelling, Snafu makes an excelent point !

hunkermunker · 30/03/2005 13:15

PMSL

MUM007 · 30/03/2005 13:24

I can see the headlines "MUMSNET MOLE GETS 2 YEARS FOR INTRUDING ON A PRIVATE CONVERSATION".

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.