You seem to have a very short memory running. I'm not sure why you've decided to question the wording now - after arguing with me that I have said that for the last few pages but here is the conversation from last night that started all this:
Scrounginscum Fri 06-Jul-12 22:08:10
I am beginning to think some people are deliberately missing the point. Off course women have been raped while wearing skimpy clothes bumbly but the point is they weren't raped because of their clothes.
bumbleymummy Fri 06-Jul-12 23:06:32
Why did you direct that at me scrounge? I haven't said they were
Scrounginscum Fri 06-Jul-12 23:19:43
Because I was replying to your post bumbly. I posted saying clothing advice offered zero protection against rape to which you replied by asking me why I thought this did I think women were never raped in those circumstances. So I was replying to that post.
runningforthebusinheels Fri 06-Jul-12 23:26:46
Bumbley has indeed posted to that effect on this and other threads - but I think she may be modifying her opinions on that score.
bumbleymummy Fri 06-Jul-12 23:28:30
Scrounge, please tell me which post it was (time?)because afaiac I have not said that a woman was raped because of what she was wearing!
Top ↑
Reply ↓
Report
bumbleymummy Fri 06-Jul-12 23:30:54
Running, where?
Top ↑
Reply ↓
Report
runningforthebusinheels Fri 06-Jul-12 23:33:59
Bumbley, I don't want to re-open wounds, but we had a discussion earlier on the thread about high heels. You have since said you have changed your opinion on what women wear and whether they are raped.
So are you going to argue now that you weren't agreeing with scrounge's accusation? That you meant something else? That you don't agree with how I've worded it?